Sunday, March 30, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Sunday, March 30, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Gaige Grosskreutz Admits Pointing Gun at Kyle Rittenhouse, Advancing Toward Him

spot_img

During dramatic testimony in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, Gaige Grosskreutz, the only man who survived being shot by Rittenhouse, testified that he was pointing his gun at Rittenhouse and advancing on him when Rittenhouse shot him.

Grosskreutz also admitted that he was carrying a gun, at times stuck into the back of his waist, that night even though his concealed carry permit was expired. It’s illegal to carry a gun concealed in Wisconsin without a permit, but Grosskreutz was never charged with that offense. He said he frequently carried guns at protests because he believes in the Second Amendment.

Grosskreutz also testified that, a few seconds earlier, he had feared for Kyle Rittenhouse’s safety because Rittenhouse was being attacked by other people, including Anthony Huber, who was hitting him with a skateboard – helping Rittenhouse’s self-defense argument in the Huber death.

But it was his description of the moments leading up to his own shooting that were the most damning for the state.

“It wasn’t until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him… that he fired, right?” defense attorney Corey Chirafisi asked Grosskreutz.

“Correct,” said Grosskreutz. He tried to claim at another point that he wasn’t intentionally pointing the gun.

The defense showed Grosskreutz a photo of that moment he was shot. It shows him holding a gun. He got within three feet of Rittenhouse. Here’s the full exchange.

Gaige grosskreutz testifies

Defense attorney: “You would agree your firearm is pointed at Mr. Rittenhouse correct?”

Grosskreutz: “Yes.”

Defense: “Once your firearm is pointed at Mr. Rittenhouse, that’s when he fires his gun, yes?

Grosskreutz: “No.”

Defense: “Sir, look…Does this look like right now your arm is being shot?”

Grosskreutz: “That looks like my bicep being vaporized yes.”

Defense: “It’s being vaporized because you’re pointing a gun directly at him, yes?”

Grosskreutz: “Yes.”

Defense: “When you’re standing 3-5 feet from him with your arms up in the air he never fired. Right?”

Grosskreutz: “Correct.”

Defense: “It wasn’t until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him with your gun, now your hands down, pointed at him, that he fired, right?”

Grosskreutz: “Correct.”

In a line of questioning that would seem to bolster Rittenhouse’s self-defense claims in Grosskreutz’s shooting as well as in the Anthony Huber shooting (the second of three). The defense attorney asked Grosskreutz, “You believe he’s (Rittenhouse) in physical danger because he’s being attacked?” Grosskreutz said yes. He also agreed that he was concerned for Kyle Rittenhouse’s safety before he, himself, entered the fray.

He admits that he approached Rittenhouse while holding a gun out, and was “closing” in toward him, at the time Rittenhouse shot him. You can see the gun in Grosskreutz’s hand. The defense also tried to establish that Grosskreutz has a monetary motive to want Rittenhouse convicted, as he has a civil suit in which he’s seeking millions of dollars and his attorney was in court. In addition, he refused to give a statement to authorities in September 2020 on the advice of that attorney, left out that he had a gun in court records, didn’t tell police he had the gun during the shooting in his first statement, and wouldn’t give police permission to search his cell phone (they had a search warrant but chose not to use it).

Shortly before he shot Grosskreutz, Rittenhouse was being hit with a skateboard and rushed by Anthony Huber, whom he shot and killed, Grosskreutz confirmed; Grosskreutz said that Huber was trying to “wrestle” Rittenhouse’s gun from him. “I tried to tell him to stop hitting him with a skateboard,” Grosskreutz said of Huber.

“You are by your own admission pointing a pistol from less than three feet away at his head?” the defense attorney asked.

He said no initially but when pressed responded, “In the direction, yes, But directly no.”

He also, though, said that he felt he was in imminent danger of being killed by Rittenhouse, whom he believed was an “active shooter.”

The defense asked Grosskreutz whether he told his former roommate that the “only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before entering the entire mag into him,” meaning Rittenhouse. He said he did not say that.

Gaige grosskreutz testifies

The defense repeatedly asked Grosskreutz whether, in his initial police interview, he “omitted that you ran up on him (Rittenhouse) and had a Glock pistol in hand.” Grosskreutz responded, “Correct.” The defense team also queried Grosskreutz on whether he “lied” to police by telling them that his gun fell off his waist before the shooting, when he had it in his hand at the time of the shooting. He denied lying and said he was on paid meds and in pain and traumatized at the time from his arm injury, which blew 90 percent of his bicep off. But the defense attorney pointed out he was lucidly describing other details at that time, including giving a description of Rittenhouse’s clothing to police.

Grosskreutz admitted that he ran down the street when he saw Rittenhouse running after the Rosenbaum shooting, which he didn’t see. He denied “chasing” Rittenhouse but admitted “closing distance between the defendant and I” when he was shot. He also admitted he had the gun in his hand at that point and was close to Rittenhouse.

Here’s a picture of Grosskreutz reaching for his gun earlier in the night, establishing where he was keeping it despite not having a valid concealed carry permit:

Gaige grosskreutz testifies

Grosskreutz, who said he went to Kenosha as a medic (he was a trained paramedic), claimed he thought Rittenhouse was an “active shooter,” but, under Wisconsin law, what matters is what Rittenhouse believed at the time, not Grosskreutz. Rittenhouse must show he reasonably believed his life or that of another was in danger or they were in danger of great bodily harm.

“I was never trying to kill the defendant. I was trying to preserve my own life,” he insisted. Asked why he didn’t shoot Rittenhouse first, Grosskreutz said that was “not the kind of person I am.” (He does have a prior criminal history, a misdemeanor, for intoxicated use of a firearm and was previously accused of prowling at the West Allis police station. The protest group he’s affiliated with, the People’s Revolution, instigated a violent attack against two police officers at their own home in Wauwatosa, although Grosskreutz wasn’t present for that.)

Grosskreutz also described encountering Rittenhouse as he ran down the street following the Rosenbaum shooting. He said that Rittenhouse said, “I’m going to the police. I didn’t do anything,” not what he originally thought he said, “I’m working with the police. I didn’t do anything.” That conversation occurred after Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum (who was chasing him and lunging for his gun, per earlier witness testimony.) Grosskreutz was jogging alongside Rittenhouse at that point.

His former roommate posted a picture with Grosskreutz in the hospital on social media. Grosskreutz denied making comment to his former roommate that his only regret was that he didn’t empty his magazine in Rittenhouse as his roommate posted on social media that he did.

Grosskreutz admitted being affiliated with the People’s Revolution group but said he wasn’t a member of it. He has participated in George Floyd protests and was an ACLU legal observer that day.

elon musk

Elon Musk in Green Bay: Wisconsin Supreme Court Race Could Determine Control of U.S. House

Tesla CEO Elon Musk took a stage in Green Bay, Wisconsin, Sunday, and warned Wisconsin...

WATCH: Elon Musk Town Hall Rally in Green Bay [FULL Video]

Tesla CEO and free speech advocate Elon Musk is appearing at a Town Hall in...
elon musk

Elon Musk Accuses Wisconsin AG Josh Kaul of Trying to Restrain His Free Speech

A lawyer for Tesla CEO and free speech advocate Elon Musk is accusing Wisconsin's partisan...
Brad Schimel

Retired Waukesha Cop Tells Moving Story About Brad Schimel

By: Paul Paikowski, retired Waukesha Police detective Editor's note: We first saw this post that Paikowski...
elon musk

Josh Kaul’s Blunder: How His Lawfare Against Elon Musk Helps Brad Schimel

Josh Kaul, you've been had. Elon Musk just rolled you. While the liberal media are (predictably) all...

The Great American Company [Up Against the Wall]

I love the show The Food That Built America, in which they go through the...
josh kaul

The Wisconsin DOJ’s ‘Unlawful’ Lawman [WRN Voices]

This is an opinion column by David Craig, former Wisconsin State Senator and Legal Director...
Trump

College Students Are Thriving Under the Trump Administration

This is an opinion column by Wisconsin college student Jenna Piwowarczyk. As January brought on a...
elon musk

Wisconsin Appeals Court DENIES Josh Kaul Legal Action Against Elon Musk

A Wisconsin appeals court has shot down Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul's legal action against...
david maas, zach wittchow

Brad Schimel Endorses Zach Wittchow, David Maas for Waukesha Co. Judgeships

David Maas and Zach Wittchow are both running against Evers' appointees. Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel...
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Judges vs. Trump [Up Against the Wall]

I’m so sick of these judges … I agree that the U.S. supreme court has...
the fed

The Fed Reverses Course [Up Against the Wall]

On Wednesday March 19th, the Fed said it was keeping interest rates high, but more...
brett favre

Brett Favre Urges People to Vote for Brad Schimel: ‘This is for the Soul of Wisconsin’

Former Green Bay Packer QB Brett Favre is urging Wisconsinites to vote for Brad Schimel...
schimel signs

Brad Schimel Signs Spray Painted in Burlington by Suspect Caught on Video

Multiple Brad Schimel for Wisconsin Supreme Court signs were spray painted throughout Burlington, Wisconsin, on...
brad schimel

Wisconsin’s Largest Law Enforcement Group Endorses Brad Schimel

Wisconsin's largest law enforcement group has endorsed Judge Brad Schimel in the Wisconsin Supreme Court...
Brad Schimel Supreme Court

Trump Urges Wisconsin to Vote for Brad Schimel, Not ‘Radical Left Liberal’ Susan Crawford

President Donald Trump has thrown his support to Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel, writing...

Phil Gramm’s Letter to Wall Street Journal [Up Against the Wall]

First, happy St. Patrick’s Day! Now to more serious items. Phil Gramm and Donald Boudreaux’s...

Bridget Schoenborn vs. David Maas: An Evers’ Appointee Seeks Re-election For Waukesha Co. Judge

Being an appointee of Democratic Gov. Tony Evers is usually the political death knell in...

WILL Makes Argument Against ROFR: ‘It Is Unconstitutional’

This is a memorandum on the "Right of First Refusal" legislation in the state of...
Field and Media Corps IDs For Illegal Immigrants Wisconsin Proposed Voter ID Rep Binfield wec

Report: Wisconsin Voter ID Law Hasn’t had Negative Impact on Voter Turnout

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s voter ID law has had no negative impact on voter turnout in the state since it was fully implemented, according to a new report from the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty.

Voter turnout, in fact, has slightly increased since the law went into effect. Wisconsin voters will vote on making voter ID a constitutional amendment April 1.

Democrats in the state have argued the amendment will disenfranchise voters.

The state’s current law, however, has had no negative impact on minority groups voting or Dane and Milwaukee counties.

The report found that socioeconomic factors such as poverty rates and education levels have a larger impact on voter turnout than voter ID laws.

“By analyzing decades of election data both before and after Wisconsin implemented Voter ID, we found a general rise in voter turnout, rather than the widespread disenfranchisement that critics often suggest,” said WILL Research Director Will Flanders. “Any claims suggesting Voter ID is ‘voter suppression’ are merely political scare tactics aimed at undermining faith in Wisconsin’s elections. Furthermore, it’s worth exploring whether Voter ID can actually increase turnout by strengthening confidence in Wisconsin’s election system.”

The research cited several studies that backed its conclusion across the country, with data showing that states with voter ID laws don’t have significantly different turnout than those without the law.

It also cited a Wisconsin study after the 2016 election where 1.7% said they didn’t vote because they didn’t have adequate ID while 1.4% said they were told at the polls that their ID was not adequate.

“It is well known among political scientists that individuals have a tendency to lie to pollsters regarding whether they voted or not,” the report said. “One key explanation for this is what is known as social desirability bias. In general, people do not want to ‘look bad’ to pollsters. As such, they may lie to the pollster about things that are perceived as socially undesirable, such as refraining from voting.”

Instead, WILL’s report looked at aggregate data of turnout change in the state and in key counties such as Dane and Milwaukee.

The study found that voter turnout has increased by 1.5%, on average, in the state since the law was implemented.

“This is an interesting result,” the report said. “While it is likely too large of a leap to say voter ID has increased turnout due to the correlational nature of our analysis, it seems that there is no negative relationship.”