Tuesday, September 16, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Joel Kleefisch’s Lobbying History Explored: Anti Abortion, Hunting Bills

spot_img

Joel Kleefisch’s lobbying activities included supporting multiple Republican-sponsored pro-life bills.

Rebecca Kleefisch’s husband Joel, a former legislator, is a lobbyist. What for?

Joel Kleefisch is listed as a lobbyist in Wisconsin from 2019-2022. A review of all of the bills shows his lobbying activities included work for groups that focus on people with disabilities, virtual schools, and hunting and sportsman activities. He also lobbied for two organizations that push issues supporting deaf people.

Much of his lobbying doesn’t seem particularly controversial, and we did not find any positions that contradict conservative principles. For example, he was a lobbyist for a sportsman group when it lobbied to allow stocking of brook trout in Lake Michigan and the purchasing of dog training licenses online. His lobbying for two sportsman groups  – the Wisconsin Game Preserve Association and Wisconsin Sporting Alliance – was most voluminous.

A few of the bills pushed by the groups tied to Joel Kleefisch’s lobbying waded into contentious issues. For example, he lobbied for a group that helps people with disabilities on multiple Republican-sponsored abortion-related pro-life bills. One bill supported by the group required health care providers present at abortions or attempted abortions to do everything they could to save the child’s life if the child is born alive. Another banned selective abortions based on race and congenital disabilities, including Down Syndrome, with the exception of “a life-limiting fetal anomaly.”

In another example, a group he lobbied for, the Wisconsin Game Preserve Association, pushed a bill that “maintains the option to have a license to carry a concealed weapon or a law enforcement identification card so that licensees or card holders may carry a concealed firearm in other states that require licensure and so that they do not violate federal law when possessing a firearm in a school zone.” He also lobbied to raise the age for buying cigarettes and vapes from 18 to 21.

Rebecca Kleefisch’s opponents have raised her husband’s lobbying as an issue after she criticized roadbuilding lobbyists she believes are supporting businessman Tim Michels. The Kleefisch campaign counters that Kleefisch’s remarks on lobbyists were specific to roadbuilders (she has criticized Michels’ involvement in groups that aggressively pushed to raise the gas tax in campaign ads. The gas tax helps fund the transportation fund used to build roads in the state. Over the years, Michels was board president and served on the board of such a group. His company helps fund them and company representatives have sat on boards.)

Joel Kleefisch is not running for governor, but, as a lobbyist, he is involved in public policy. He says he will give up his lobbying work if his wife wins. However, she clearly derives a financial interest from his lobbying. Thus, in our quest to educate voters and vet the candidates in the Republican primary, we decided to look up Joel Kleefisch’s lobbying history. What, exactly, has Joel Kleefisch lobbied for? We used state records to do so, going through each group and bill.

A Joel Kleefisch tied group also pushed a bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to authorize the hunting of sandhill cranes by individuals who have completed a sandhill crane hunter education course and who possess the appropriate approval issued by DNR.” He also lobbied for a group that deals with inmate vending issues, but the group opposed a Democratic bill. He lobbied for the Wisconsin Psychology Board, which supported requiring psychological exams for law enforcement officers, and which supported expanding mental health treatment allowed by state grants to counties and tribes.

He also lobbied for a group that wanted state government to use the phrase “intellectual disability” instead of “mental retardation.”

Joel Kleefisch lobbied for a group that supported repealing three DNR rules relating to hunting, fishing, and trapping for every new DNR rule passed.

You can see a summary of all of his lobbying activities below and decide for yourself what weight to give them. Here are the groups that Joel Kleefisch was a registered lobbyist for, and the bills that they were for and against.


2021-2022 Legislative Session

All American Association of Home Inspectors

What are they? AAAHI represents home inspectors and their efforts to stay current with laws and regulations governing their industry. AAAHI offers educational training for continuing and would be home inspectors.”

The group’s lobbying interests: “All legislative and administrative matters that may affect the business of conducting home inspections by managers, owners, or employees of the home inspection industry.”

What did they lobby for? They lobbied for a bill relating to the regulation of home inspectors that modified the definition of a defect, required 40 hours of instruction to become a home inspector, and exempted newly registered home inspectors from continuing education requirements after the first two registration renewals.


A-Team Grassroots System Inc.

What are they? “Member families throughout Wisconsin share the common goal of grassroots efforts to educate and advocate for an understanding of the disabled community and its efforts to create employment, housing, and living opportunities. Its families engage with lawmakers and policymakers to support medicaid funding for a full array of service choice.”

Lobbying Interests: “A-team will work to influence the legislative process of budgeting and statute creation in an effort to advance the cause of benefiting people with disabilities in the workplace, society, and home. A-team will lobby to protect 14(c) status and the benefits it offers to employers and employees.”

What did they lobby for:

They lobbied for a bill that “establishes a rare disease advisory council in the Department of Health Services to advise DHS and provide recommendations to both the governor and the legislature regarding issues relating to rare diseases.”

They lobbied for a bill that “requires the Department of Financial Institutions to study and report on establishing a Wisconsin qualified ABLE program under section 529A of the Internal Revenue Code allowing tax-exempt accounts for qualified expenses incurred by individuals with disabilities.”

They lobbied for a joint resolution “relating to: recognizing Employment Choice First as a means to preserve the dignity, self-esteem, and pride of individuals with disabilities in Wisconsin.”


CV Academics Inc.

What are they? “Promoting and selling a virtual platform connecting students with educational opportunities and careers in healthcare and other professions.”

What are their lobbying interests? “Promoting and expanding school district’s abilities to utilize a virtual platform for students to engage in assistance in education, career selection and professional connections.”

What did they lobby for?

No bills are listed.


DCI Group AZ L.L.C.

What are they?DCI Group is an independent public affairs firm specializing in strategic communications, coalition management, ally management, media relations, and digital advocacy.”

What are their lobbying interests?

“Relating to the regulation of vapor and tobacco products.”

What did they lobby for?

They lobbied for a bill that “changes the age for purchasing cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products from 18 to 21, and imposes the same minimum age for purchasing vapor products.”


Numotion

What are they?Numotion produces, fits, and sells mobility equipment for people with disabilities.”

What are their lobbying interests? “Numotion intends to lobby the administration during the rule making process as it applies to 2017 Wisconsin Act 306. Numotion intends to lobby the legislature, executive branch, and administration in relation to medicaid funding for mobility standing technology for people with disabilities.”

What did they lobby for?

They lobbied for a bill to establish “more circumstances under which DHS reimburses a provider for a complex rehabilitation technology prescribed for a recipient of Medical Assistance who resides in a nursing home…Relating to: reimbursement of wheelchairs and power mobility devices for recipients of Medical Assistance who reside in a nursing home.”


Union Supply Group

What are they?Union Supply provides food, apparel, footwear, electronics, and personal-care products to State, Federal and County correctional institutions nationwide.”

What are their lobbyist interests? Issues relating to amending state law to personal property items to inmates.

What did they lobby for?

The group lobbied against a Democratic bill that would do the following:

“This bill requires the Department of Corrections to contract with no fewer than three vendors to provide hobby, religious, and other personal property items for sale to inmates in state correctional institutions. Under the bill, DOC must allow an inmate, or a third party on behalf of an inmate, to purchase the items and must give inmates equal access to all vendors that DOC contracts with for this purpose. The bill also specifies that DOC must ensure that at least one of the vendors offers a storefront in the city of Milwaukee where a third party may place an order for items to be delivered to an inmate.”


Wisconsin Game Preserve Association

What are they?WGPA is a business association comprised of game bird breeders, sport shooting facilities, owners, managers and specialty vendors who provide services and products used by the industry as part of Wisconsin’s sport and hunting heritage.”

What are their lobbying interests? “The Wisconsin Game Preserve Association will be active in all legislative and administrative areas of our state government that affect the ownership, operation or management of our businesses . We continue to work closely with the DATCP in the areas of animal health disease and rural economic development. We honor the sporting heritage of our state and add to to the alternative agricultural economy.”

What did they lobby for?

A bill that “provides that the prohibition on entering or remaining on railroad
tracks does not apply to a person walking directly across the tracks or right-of-way
of a railroad.”

A bill that “makes numerous changes so that farm-raised game bovids are treated
in the same manner as farm-raised deer.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to prepare a report that
identifies opportunities for partnering with the private aquaculture industry for
increased stocking of desirable sport fish in lakes and streams.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to prepare a report that
identifies ways to consolidate or eliminate hunting, fishing, and trapping approvals
to reduce the total number of types of approvals.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to create a biennial
work plan that establishes priorities and goals for habitat work on lands managed
by DNR and measures progress on established priorities and goals.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to offer dog training
licenses for purchase through the electronic system DNR uses for the purchase of
hunting and other approvals (known as GoWild).”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to authorize the
hunting of sandhill cranes by individuals who have completed a sandhill crane
hunter education course and who possess the appropriate approval issued by DNR.”

A bill that “maintains the option to have a license to carry a concealed weapon or
a law enforcement identification card so that licensees or card holders may carry a
concealed firearm in other states that require licensure and so that they do not
violate federal law when possessing a firearm in a school zone.”

A bill that “provides that an individual may satisfy the in-person field testing
requirement by participating in a mentored hunt.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to modify
administrative rules relating to the hunting of wild turkeys to combine hunting
zones and seasons and to modify youth hunting restrictions.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to prepare a report that
identifies public access opportunities on all lands owned or managed by DNR, land
acquired under the Warren Knowles-Gaylord Nelson stewardship program, and
open managed forest lands.”

A bill that “requires DNR to annually stock Lake Michigan with at least 100,000 brook trout.”

A bill that “provides that, for each new rule that the Department of Natural
Resources promulgates relating to hunting, fishing, or trapping, DNR must repeal
three existing rules relating to hunting, fishing, or trapping.”

A bill relating to “stocking pheasants for hunting.”


Wisconsin Psychological Association

What they lobby for: “Our Mission is to advance psychology as a profession which promotes human welfare through the ethical application of psychological principles in research, teaching and practice. We provide a professional identity for psychologists by maintaining active affiliation with APA We advocate on behalf of the profession and the interests of our members. We encourage a scientific attitude toward psychological practice We provide forums for the professional exchange of information and opinion about the diversity of psychological issues and of the profession itself. We address concerns of our communities by responding as a profession to psychological and social needs of Wisconsin citizens We educate the public about psychology and psychological issues.”

Lobbying interests: “Licensing Bill that is being introduced. Interest related to mental health and public education surrounding mental health. Our Mission is to advance psychology as a profession which promotes human welfare through the ethical application of psychological principles in research, teaching and practice. We provide a professional identity for psychologists by maintaining active affiliation with APA We advocate on behalf of the profession and the interests of our members. We encourage a scientific attitude toward psychological practice We provide forums for the professional exchange of information and opinion about the diversity of psychological issues and of the profession itself. We address concerns of our communities by responding as a profession to psychological and social needs of Wisconsin citizens We educate the public about psychology and psychological issues.”

What did they lobby for?

A bill that “makes various revisions to the laws governing the examining board and the practice of psychology.”

A bill that “provides that the LESB (Law Enforcement Standards Board) must require, prior to employment on a  full-time basis as a law enforcement officer, that an individual submit to a psychological examination to determine the individual’s suitability to perform the  duties of an officer. The LESB must promulgate administrative rules to govern the  administration and interpretation of such psychological examinations, including the type of test to be used and the time limits on such an examination’s applicability. The examination must be paid for by the prospective employer. The records associated with the examination must be kept confidential and are not subject to public disclosure, but may be disclosed by the prospective employer to other prospective  employers.”

A bill that “ratifies and enters Wisconsin into the Psychology Interjurisdictional
Compact (compact), which provides for the ability of a psychologist to practice more
easily in other compact states.”

A bill that says: “Under current law, the Department of Justice, in collaboration with the Department of Corrections and the Department of Health Services, awards grants to counties and tribes that have established qualifying treatment alternatives and diversion (TAD) programs that offer alcohol or drug treatment services as alternatives to prosecution or incarceration in order to reduce recidivism, promote public safety, and reduce prison and jail populations. Under the bill, a program funded by a TAD grant need not focus solely on alcohol  and other drug treatment, but may provide treatment programs for a person who has any mental illness.”

A bill that “combines the child psychiatry consultation program with additional
services into a new mental health consultation program.”


Wisconsin Sporting Alliance

What they are: “Business Or Interest: promoting the use and conservation of Wisconsin’s natural resources. Promoting hunting and fishing. Introduction of new users of Wisconsin’s great outdoors.”

Lobbying Interests: “Hunting, fishing, and utilization and preservation of Wisconsin’s natural resources.”

What they lobbied for:

A bill that “provides that the prohibition on entering or remaining on railroad
tracks does not apply to a person walking directly across the tracks or right-of-way
of a railroad.”

The bill that “makes numerous changes so that farm-raised game bovids are treated
in the same manner as farm-raised deer.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to prepare a report that
identifies opportunities for partnering with the private aquaculture industry for
increased stocking of desirable sport fish in lakes and streams.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to prepare a report that
identifies ways to consolidate or eliminate hunting, fishing, and trapping approvals
to reduce the total number of types of approvals DNR is required to issue.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to create a biennial
work plan that establishes priorities and goals for habitat work on lands managed
by DNR and measures progress on established priorities and goals.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to offer dog training
licenses for purchase through the electronic system DNR uses for the purchase of
hunting and other approvals (known as GoWild).”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to authorize the
hunting of sandhill cranes by individuals who have completed a sandhill crane
hunter education course and who possess the appropriate approval issued by DNR.”

The same gun bill as mentioned above.

A bill that “provides that an individual may satisfy the in-person field testing
requirement by participating in a mentored hunt.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to modify
administrative rules relating to the hunting of wild turkeys to combine hunting
zones and seasons and to modify youth hunting restrictions.”

The same bill mentioned above on public land access.

The same bill mentioned above on stocking brooking trout.

A bill that “provides that, for each new rule that the Department of Natural Resources promulgates relating to hunting, fishing, or trapping, DNR must repeal three existing rules relating to hunting, fishing, or trapping.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Natural Resources to establish a schedule for stocking pheasants to ensure adequate hunting opportunities through the end of each pheasant hunting season.”


2019-2020 legislative session

Note: He is not listed as “exclusive” lobbyist for any of the following.

All American Association of Home Inspectors

See above for what the group is.

What did the group lobby for this session?

They supported a bill that that involved laws governing home inspectors. Among other things, it required home inspectors to be licensed, rather than registered.


A-Team Grassroots System Inc.

See above for a description of the group.

They lobbied for a bill that “substitutes the phrase ‘intellectual disability’ and similar phrases for ‘mental retardation,’ ‘mentally retarded,’ and similar phrases in rules promulgated by the Department of Health Services, the Department of Children and Families, the Public Service Commission, the Department of Safety and Professional Services, and the Department of Workforce Development. The bill also changes the definition of ‘intellectual disability’ in rules promulgated by DHS.”

The group supported a bill that “requires any health care provider present at the time an abortion or attempted abortion results in a child born alive to exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care provider would render to any other child born alive at the same gestational age and to ensure that the child born alive is immediately transported and admitted to a hospital.”

The group supported a Republican bill that “requires certain information regarding an abortion-inducing drug regimen to be provided to a woman that is planning to have an abortion induced by the abortion-inducing drug regimen. This bill also adds to the information required to be reported for induced abortions.”

The group supported a Republican bill that “prohibits the Department of Health Services from certifying, and requires DHS to decertify, as a provider for Medical Assistance a person that provides abortion services or is an affiliate of a person that provides abortion services and that is a nonprofit private entity that has received at any time or has applied for a grant or contract for a family planning project under federal law.”

The group supported a Republican bill that “prohibits a person from performing or inducing or attempting to perform or induce an abortion on a woman if the person knows the woman is seeking an abortion solely because of the race, color, national origin, ancestry, or sex of the unborn child or solely because the unborn child has been diagnosed with or has a potential diagnosis of Down syndrome or another congenital disability. A congenital disability is defined in the bill as any congenital disease, defect, or disorder, except a life-limiting fetal anomaly, which is a profound and irremediable congenital or chromosomal anomaly that is incompatible with sustaining life after birth and does not include any condition that can be treated.”

The group supported a Republican bill that “prohibits the Department of Health Services from certifying, and requires DHS to decertify by July 1, 2020, a provider under the Medical Assistance program that is a private entity that provides abortion services or is an affiliate of a person that provides abortion services.”

A bill that “modifies the definition of complex rehabilitation technology and requires the Department of Health Services to defer to the determination of a physician regarding the medical necessity of a complex rehabilitation technology item or service and, upon a physician’s determination of medical necessity, consider a complex rehabilitation technology item or service for a complex needs patient as medically necessary for purposes of reimbursement under this Medical Assistance program.”

A bill that “requires the Department of Health Services to establish for the 2019-21 fiscal biennium a community-based services grant program to distribute awards to provider organizations offering facility-based prevocational and day services who apply to initiate or increase and sustain their provision of community-based services that create pathways to and increase competitive integrated employment for people with disabilities.”


DCI Group AZ L.L.C.

The group supported a bill that “changes the age for purchasing cigarettes, tobacco products, or nicotine products from 18 to 21, and imposes a minimum age for purchasing vapor products.”


Numotion

The group supported a bill that “modifies the definition of complex rehabilitation technology and requires the Department of Health Services to defer to the determination of a physician regarding the medical necessity of a complex rehabilitation technology item or service and, upon a physician’s determination of medical necessity, consider a complex rehabilitation technology item or service for a complex needs patient as medically necessary for purposes of reimbursement under this Medical Assistance program.”


Wisconsin Association of the Deaf

The group supported a bill relating to changing rules for sign language interpreters.


Wisconsin Game Preserve Association

The group supported a bill that says the “DNR may not prohibit the transportation of a deer carcass out of the county in which it was harvested. Also under the bill, DNR must require that all parts of a deer carcass be removed from the field, except for entrails.”

The group was against a bill that “prohibits the organization of and participation in contests for killing wild animals.”


Wisconsin Psychological Association

The group supported a bill that “requires the Department of Health Services to award 50 grants, each lasting for two fiscal years and in the amount of $75,000 per fiscal year per grant, to local branches of statewide private nonprofit organizations that apply and that satisfy criteria specified in the bill, including that the organization be able to raise $25,000, which it must contribute to support the trauma-informed care position and administrative expenses for trauma-informed care programming.”

The group supported a bill that “makes various revisions to the laws governing the board and the practice of psychology.”

The group supported a bill that “requires the Department of Public Instruction to annually provide a grant to the Center for Suicide Awareness, Inc. The purpose of the grant is to provide funding for staff, training, and expenses related to operating a text-based suicide prevention service. In each of the 2019-20 and 2020-21 fiscal years, the amount of the grant to the Center for Suicide Awareness, Inc., is $110,000.”


Wisconsin Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf

The group was for a bill that changed regulations for sign-language interpreters.

tyler robinson

Lance Twiggs Was the Roommate,’Boyfriend’ of Tyler Robinson, Family Member Says

Lance Twiggs was named as the roommate of accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson by The New York Post and Daily Mail. After those reports,...
anthony stella

Wisconsin Judge Anthony Stella Defends Calling Charlie Kirk a ‘White Supremacist’ & Liar; Cites Wikipedia

A Wisconsin judge appointed by Gov. Tony Evers is defending calling assassinated activist Charlie Kirk a "white supremacist" and "liar," among other claims, but...
charlie kirk widow

Charlie Kirk’s Widow Erika Tells the Nation: ‘The Cries of This Widow Will Echo Around the World’

"You have no idea the fire you have ignited within this wife. The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a...

Free Speech, Freedom From Violence a Concern After Charlie Kirk Assassination

Political activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination at an Utah college on Wednesday has drawn a renewed call for security measures to protect individuals across college campuses and in public forums. The fatal shooting also raises concerns about freedom of speech on campuses and elsewhere.

Kirk, the founder of the nonprofit political organization Turning Point USA, was killed on the first stop in his “American Comeback Tour,” an event where he engaged attendees on political issues.

“Join Charlie Kirk on campus for a lively discussion of Freedom and America! Don’t agree with Charlie? Great, you go to the front of the line,” a TPUSA social media post reads.

The reactions following Kirk’s death have reverberated throughout the nation, with sympathies pouring in from elected officials across the world.

U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., told reporters on Thursday that she does not plan to host any public or outdoor events in the wake of Kirk’s killing.

“I am deeply concerned for my safety,” Mace said. “I don’t care if you are Republican or Democrat – any elected official across the country – if you are vocal, your life is at risk.”

“I will not be doing any outdoor events anytime soon, we will not be doing any public events anytime soon until we have a better handle on greater security controls,” Mace said.

Robert Sibley, special counsel at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, or FIRE, said Kirk’s shooting represented a threat to free speech on college campuses.

“His killing seems deliberately designed to dissuade people from engaging in that kind of open debate,” Sibley said.

Carrie Lukas, president of political advocacy group Independent Women, said Kirk’s shooting highlights a recent trend of political violence and threats to freedom of speech in the United States that makes her concerned.

In June, the Independent Women’s Forum held its “Her Game, Her Legacy” bus tour that focused on transgender participation in sports. Lukas recalled incidents of vandalism and times when her organization’s events have been disturbed by trespassing individuals or protesters.

Victoria Coley, vice president of communications at Independent Women, said these events are becoming common for conservative political groups.

“There tends to always be some level of threat that our security detail has to look into,” Coley said. “That is something that groups who are center or center right are facing.”

Research from the Cato Institute shows politically motivated violence accounted for 3,599 deaths in the United States between 1975 and today. Eighty-three percent of those murdered are attributed to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Lukas said she will be increasing security measures for future events the Independent Women’s Forum hosts in the future. The increased focus on security might alienate some people from hearing her organization’s messages, Lukas said, but she considers the precautionary measures to be more important.

“The reaction to this can’t be that we stop having public events,” Lukas said. “You don’t want to have to create a bunch of barriers to people attending those events. There’s going to be a lot more reticence to have events of this size, because it's going to be a real big concern for everybody moving forward.”

Lukas said a larger conversation on freedom of speech is important to have in the wake of Kirk’s killing.

“We absolutely have to stay committed to the right of terrible people to say terrible things,” Lukas said. “But we have to have a very clear understanding of what is no longer protest and what is no longer a part of speech.”

Free speech on college campuses, like where Kirk was, remains a contentious issue in the aftermath of mass protests across the country over the Israel-Hamas war.

Students held encampments in public spaces, barricaded libraries and vandalized buildings on colleges. Lukas said this violence, barricading and destroying of property crosses the line of free speech.

“Your right to free speech stops well before you are ruining public spaces for others,” Lukas said. “We can’t indulge and excuse all bad behavior under the name of peaceful protest.”

In an apparent crackdown on protest behavior, around 80 students at Columbia University were reportedly expelled or arrested.

“Disruptions to academic activities are in violation of University policies and Rules, and such violations will necessarily generate consequences,” the university wrote in a May statement.

The university also made a deal with the Trump administration to withhold pulling of federal funds in response to its handling of last year’s protests and treatment of Jewish students on campus.

Sibley said he expects college campuses to be more proactive in allowing students to express political views and hosting events like Kirk’s in the future.

“Colleges and universities have spent a lot of time and effort over the last 30 years telling students about the value of tolerating people with different identities,” Sibley said. “It's time to put that level of effort into explaining why it is so important to be willing to listen to and engage with people who have viewpoints you find objectionable rather than finding some way to silence them.”

“Campuses need to do everything they can to make it possible for people like Charlie Kirk to continue to come to campus and engage with others, and should dedicate whatever resources are necessary to make that possible. Murderers must not get a veto over who may speak on our nation's campuses,” Sibley added.

Tyler Robinson of Utah ID’d as Charlie Kirk Suspect After Dad Turns Him In

Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old man from Utah, was named as the Charlie Kirk assassin by authorities. Utah's governor Spencer Cox said Robinson had made negative...
charlie kirk shot

Charlie Kirk Dead at 31: Tributes & Tears Flow, as Suspect Remains at Large

Turning Point co-founder Charlie Kirk, who was shot and killed at the age of 31 while speaking at a Utah university Wednesday, was remembered...
David Crowley

David Crowley Runs for Governor: 9 Key Things to Know, From Budget Deficits to ICE

(The Center Square) – Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley will run to be Wisconsin’s governor, his campaign announced Tuesday.

Crowley will joint Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez in the field as a Democrat after Gov. Tony Evers announced he will not seek reelection.

“I know what it’s like to struggle, and I know families across our state feel like they’re falling behind,” Crowley said in a statement. “With costs shooting up, we are all getting less, even if we’re making more. As Governor, I’ll fight every day to make sure that everyone in our state has access to what they need to succeed: good-paying jobs, more money in their pockets, affordable health care and housing, and fully funded public schools.

“Together, we can build a Wisconsin that works for all of us.”

Crowley previously said that he was taking steps to enter the race so his official announcement was not a surprise.

Whitefish Bay Resident Bill Berrien and Washington County Executive Josh Schoemann, both Republicans, were the first two candidates to announce they are running for the seat.

Crowley was a Wisconsin legislator before becoming Milwaukee County Executive. He chaired the Milwaukee Caucus and the Legislative Black Caucus.

The Democratic primary is scheduled for Aug. 11, 2026.

“As a legislator, I fought to protect the rights of people across our state, and as County Executive, I’ve led Wisconsin’s largest and most diverse county,” Crowley said. “The challenges I’ve addressed in Milwaukee County aren’t specific to one county or one political party; these are issues that communities face all across Wisconsin.”

ryan wesley routh

Routh Jury Selection Concludes Second Day

Pursuit of 12 jurors and four alternates for the trial of Ryan Routh in Florida has concluded a second day, with Judge Aileen Cannon both offering him some praise and enduring bouts of disjointed proceedings.

Routh has pleaded not guilty to charges of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate, assaulting a federal officer and several firearm violations. Cannon granted his request to defend himself, with court-appointed lawyers on standby.

Prosecutors say the suspect was going to attempt take the life of Donald Trump, eventual winner of the presidency over then-Vice President Kamala Harris, as he golfed on a Sunday afternoon. The Sept. 15 incident came 65 days after a shooter on a roof struck Trump’s ear with a bullet in Butler, Pa.

Security agents for Trump encountered Routh prior to the golf group reaching the area. Routh is accused of raising a rifle, leading to a shot from agents, a short vehicle chase and the suspect’s apprehension.

Security is tight, including federal marshals in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Fort Pierce.

Jury questionnaires have aided the process and Cannon complimented him at one point. He’s also clashed with the bench on asking questions related to politics.

Selections are expected to close on Wednesday, and opening arguments would follow on Thursday. Four weeks are reserved on the court calendar.

Routh is a construction worker by trade from Greensboro. He’s been outspoken on world conflict, inclusive of the countries of Ukraine, Afghanistan, Moldova, Taiwan and Russia.

The Center Square confirmed he participated in the Super Tuesday primaries in 2024 from the North Carolina State Board of Elections website, and in Hawaii’s 2024 elections through the Office of the City Clerk for the city and county of Honolulu.

Oliver North

Fawn Hall Marries Oliver North, Reporter Says, Decades After Iran-Contra

Fawn Hall was a key figure in the Iran-Contra scandal during President Ronald Reagan's term. She was the personal secretary to Oliver North, and...
President Biden Pardons Hunter Biden's Alleged Offenses Monthly Payments to President Biden Hunter Biden laptop story Investigation into Biden Family Hunter Biden Plea Deal

EXCLUSIVE: Secret Service Spent $11 Million on Hunter Biden Travel Detail

The Biden administration spent more than $10 million over three years on a security detail and related expenses for former First Son Hunter Biden after denying similar protections to other high-profile political figures, documents obtained by the Center to Advance Security in America and shared exclusively with The Center Square show.

The security detail for former President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, cost nearly $11 million, including on travel, real estate and expensive hotels, according to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request CASA filed.

The documents from Jan. 1, 2022, to Dec. 31, 2024, indicate that the Biden administration spent nearly $9.3 million on hotels, $1.1 million on air and rail travel, and nearly $600,000 on car transportation and rentals for Hunter Biden's Secret Service detail.

“Due to reports that Hunter Biden was playing a senior role in advising his father within the White House in 2024, CASA filed a FOIA request for information related to the taxpayer resources being spent to protect him,” CASA Director James Fitzpatrick told The Center Square in an exclusive interview. "What we found is that while the Secret Service denied protection to [then presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.], and failed to properly protect President [Donald] Trump resulting in two assassination attempts, Hunter Biden was enjoying a robust detail wherever he traveled, including trips to Nantucket, South Africa, and the Virgin Islands.”

Nearly all costs – 95% – were incurred in California, where Hunter Biden often resided, but also were incurred on expensive trips to the Virgin Islands, Nantucket, and Santa Ynez, California.

“If the Biden Secret Service was truly low on funding and staffing as they claimed in July 2024, the American people deserve answers as to why their priorities were so grossly misaligned,” Fitzpatrick said.

According to the documents, taxpayer-funded Secret Service expenses for Hunter Biden included multiple trips to Nantucket, an exclusive island off of Cape Cod, Massachusetts.

This included several hundred thousand dollars spent for a 2022 Thanksgiving trip to Nantucket, including $10,000 on golf cart rentals, $120,000 on lodging with $740 nightly hotel rates; $120,000 on travel cards, among other expenses.

A 2023 Thanksgiving trip to Nantucket cost more than half a million dollars, including $26,000 on ferries, $10,000 on golf cart rentals, $36,000 on Salt House Nantucket lodging, $133,500 on White Elephant Hotel lodging, $198,000 on Faraway Nantucket lodging, $161k on The Beachside Hotel lodging, $60,000 on Nantucket Inn lodging, among others.

Hunter Biden reportedly stayed at the estate of Democrat Party donor Joe Kiani when visiting Nantucket. “Biden and his family have made a habit of vacationing at the homes of donors to the Democratic Party. The president and his family spent Thanksgiving together three years in a row at the Nantucket compound of private equity billionaire David Rubenstein, and rang in the New Year in 2023 at the U.S. Virgin Islands home of Democratic donors Bill and Connie Neville,” The Los Angeles Times reported.

Other trips carried hefty price tags: a New Year’s trip to St. Croix cost $372,000 for real estate property and $372,000 for travel cards, according to the documents.

Multiple trip costs were for Hunter Biden and Melissa Cohen, Hunter's wife. They include:

$18,000 for a two-day trip to Santa Barbara;$10,000 for one night in Arlington, Virginia;more than $170,000 for a two-day trip to Wilmington, Delaware;more than $250,000 on 13 hotels for a Biden family and Cohen day trip to New York City;nearly $650,000 for a trip to Santa Ynex, Calif, for six hotels.

During the Biden administration, CASA recognized “a significant departure from the typical norms surrounding Secret Service protection coverage,” Fitzpatrick told The Center Square, which prompted his FOIA request. CASA, a nonpartisan organization, is dedicated to improving the safety and security of Americans.

Many also raised concerns about Biden administration policies. During the 2024 election season, the Biden administration denied former Democratic presidential candidate Kennedy secret service protection when he was running for president even though both his father and uncle were assassinated. Since then, extensive failures have been uncovered by congressional investigations regarding Secret Service protections, or lack thereof, for Trump, including during two assassination attempts made on his life.

A recent inspector general report highlights even more extensive failures. These include chronic understaffing of Secret Service counter snipers; agents working the equivalent of an additional 24 full-time employees’ workload each year in overtime; and agents missing mandatory weapons requalification testing.

CASA filed the FOIA request in June under the Trump administration and requested records within specific timeframes for resources, expenditures and other information related to travel and security detail for Hunter Biden.

amandria brunner

Amandria Brunner Is the Suspect in Marquette Lacrosse Team Deaths, 4 Sources Say

Four law enforcement sources have told Wisconsin Right Now that Amandria Brunner is the 41-year-old woman who is allegedly in custody in the deaths...
Noah Snyder and Scott Michaud

Noah Snyder & Scott Michaud: Marquette Lacrosse Players Who Died in Crash Won Honors

The Milwaukee County Medical Examiner's office has released the names of the two Marquette University students who were killed in a horrific car crash...

Capitol Police Toss Dem Claim Against Rep. Sylvia Ortiz-Velez, Vos Says: NOT CREDIBLE

The office of Speaker Robin Vos says that a gun threat accusation lodged by state Rep. Greta Neubauer against a fellow Democrat, Rep. Sylvia...
Trump

Trump Administration Pushes to Remove Noncitizen Medicaid Enrollees

The Trump administration is cracking down on noncitizens receiving Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program benefits, according to an announcement by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

The center launched an oversight program on Tuesday, in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, to provide states with reports of individuals enrolled in Medicaid who do not appear on federal databases.

“We are tightening oversight of enrollment to safeguard taxpayer dollars and guarantee that these vital programs serve only those who are truly eligible under the law,” said Robert F. Kennedy Jr., secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

States are required to review the federal reports, identify immigration status discrepancies, request information and enforce noncitizen eligibility rules.

Federal law typically does not allow noncitizens to enroll in Medicaid. However, 1.4 million people are enrolled in Medicaid who do not meet citizenship and immigration status requirements, according to data from the Congressional Budget Office.

Some states, like California, Oregon and Colorado have extended Medicaid eligibility to undocumented immigrants, which accounts for the large number of recipients. It is unclear how cooperation will go between states who have expanded Medicaid enrollment.

“Every dollar misspent is a dollar taken away from an eligible, vulnerable individual in need of Medicaid,” said CMS administrator Mehmet Oz.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law July 4, implemented tighter restrictions on Medicaid eligibility including a crackdown on work requirements for able-bodied adults, frequent eligibility redeterminations and increased restrictions on noncitizens.

The move from the health department comes as the Trump administration has worked to share more data on individuals enrolled in Medicaid. The health department first gave Immigration and Customs Enforcement access to enrollment records for individuals on Medicaid in June.

Twenty states, including California, Colorado and New York, filed a lawsuit against the department in July. A federal judge temporarily blocked the health agency from sharing information in those states last week.

“Using CMS data for immigration enforcement threatens to significantly disrupt the operation of Medicaid—a program that Congress has deemed critical for the provision of health coverage to the nation’s most vulnerable residents,” Judge Vince Chhabria wrote in the order.

Cross-party Friendships

Cross-party Friendships: Political Difference or Moral Disparity? 

I love politics. I love my friendships. Why does it feel like I have to choose between the two?  Although I’ve been an outspoken conservative...
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Think tank, election attorney support Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting

While most Democrats are opposed, President Donald Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting, which he says is ripe for fraud, has been met with approval from both an election attorney as well as the America First Policy Institute.

“President Trump should be applauded for leading the charge to ensure that every American's vote matters and is not undermined by corruption,” the America First Policy Institute (AFPI) told The Center Square by email.

“This is not just a policy fight,” AFPI said. “This is a fight for the survival of our republic.”

AFPI is a non-profit and non-partisan research institute aiming to “advance policies that put the American people first,” according to its website.

Election attorney and founder of law firm OGC Law, LLC Greg Teufel told The Center Square that “eliminating mail-in balloting would go a long way toward restoring confidence in our election procedures."

“Mail-in voting has long been recognized as the most vulnerable type of voting for election fraud,” Teufel said.

“Because ballots are not completed in front of election officials, coercion, bribery, and voting on behalf of people of limited competence is all possible,” Teufel told The Center Square.

AFPI likewise told The Center Square that “President Trump is right in saying that our elections will never be secure so long as we have widespread use of mail-in ballots.”

“With rare exception, mass mail-in voting is a recipe for fraud and chaos,” AFPI said. “Other nations recognize this, and many abandoned this broken system decades ago.”

“The United States of America is the greatest nation in the world, and our electoral system should set the global standard for security and transparency,” AFPI said.

AFPI listed to The Center Square examples of the issues of mail-in voting.

For instance, “in some states, one now can apply to be on the voter rolls as a ‘permanent absentee voter,’ which means one automatically gets an absentee ballot application every election,” AFPI said.

Additionally, “reliance solely on mail-in voting may lead to the disenfranchisement of America’s eligible citizen class and could also lead to fraud through ballot trafficking,” AFPI told The Center Square.

“Mass mail-in voting presents vulnerabilities with the chain of custody of a ballot and increases the prevalence of error in states that do not maintain clean voter rolls,” AFPI said.

The Center for Election Innovation and Research did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Trump posted on his Truth Social account Monday: “I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS.”

“ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS,” Trump said.

The president further said that “while we’re at it,” he will get rid of “Highly ‘Inaccurate,’ Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election.”

Trump said the efforts to protect elections will be brought about by an executive order “to help bring honesty to the 2026 Midterm Elections.”

chief norman

Milwaukee Police Chief Jeffrey Norman Calls For Collins Agreement to ‘Absolutely’ Be ‘Heavily Modified’

After the Collins agreement went into place in 2018, field interviews decreased 90% in five years, and traffic stops dropped by 79%. Milwaukee Police Chief...
chief jeffrey norman

Milwaukee Police Chief Jeffrey Norman Defends $60,000 Raise, Won’t Urge Back Pay for Cops

Milwaukee Police Chief Jeffrey Norman defended his $60,000 pay raise on Tuesday, saying that he works hard and earned the massive increase, but he...
cavalier johnson

Mayor Cavalier Johnson’s Most Ridiculous Moments During His Downtown Violence Presser

Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson held a press conference on downtown violence on Aug. 8, but it was filled with ridiculous moments - and a...

DOJ Launches Grand Jury Probe into ‘RussiaGate’

The U.S. Department of Justice is reportedly opening a grand jury investigation into an alleged plot by members of the Obama administration accusing President Donald Trump of colluding with Russia during the 2016 election.

The move, scooped by Fox News, marks the latest step by the second Trump administration to expose what it sees as attempts by former President Barack Obama, 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, and former intelligence officials to undermine Trump’s character and delegitimize his 2016 victory.

Three weeks ago, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard began declassifying documents appearing to show Obama – along with his senior advisors and top intelligence officials – pressured the intelligence community to contrive evidence that Russia tried to manipulate the 2016 presidential election in Trump’s favor.

Another document showed that the DNI’s 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, which concluded that Moscow “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances,” appeared not only false but also the result of apparent bad faith.

To reach their conclusion that Putin had attempted to help Trump win, top intelligence officials cherry-picked inconclusive information that supported the narrative, omitted or suppressed information contradicting the narrative, and based their “high confidence” assumptions on untrustworthy and dishonest sources, according to declassified documents.

Gabbard’s most recent bombshell, however, revealed unverified emails between Clinton campaign staffers and the vice president of a George Soros-affiliated group, planning to falsely tie Russia’s cyber interference attempts during election season to Trump.

According to the declassified Office of Special Counsel (OSC) investigation, the emails show that Clinton apparently approved of her campaign’s plan to “demonize” Trump by propagating the idea of “Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections.”

The emails also appeared to show that Clinton ally Leonard Bernardo expected the FBI “put more oil on the fire,” as a way to distract from Clinton’s previous email scandal, The Center Square reported.

Despite Trump administration rhetoric that the emails are a “smoking gun,” the declassified investigation noted that OSC never definitively determined “whether the purported Clinton campaign plan [to implicate Trump] was entirely genuine, partially true, a composite pulled from multiple sources, exaggerated in certain respects, or fabricated in its entirety.”

OSC did assess that “it is a logical deduction that [Clinton foreign policy advisor Julianne] Smith was, at a minimum, playing a role in the Clinton campaign’s efforts to tie Trump to Russia,” and that available evidence “supports the notion that the campaign might have wanted or expected the FBI or other agencies to aid the effort” via a formal investigation.

Gabbard nevertheless sent a criminal referral to Attorney General Pam Bondi. The DOJ’s grand jury probe is the first step towards securing a potential indictment, which would allow prosecutors to subpoena further evidence and collect testimonies.

Though no charges have yet been filed, unsparing rhetoric by administration officials – including Trump, who flat-out accused Obama and Clinton of “treason” – suggest that some could be formally accused of sedition, conspiracy or other charges.

Given the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling last year that presidents have broad immunity from criminal prosecution of official acts taken while in office, Obama will likely escape indictment.

As of Tuesday, the DOJ has not yet confirmed the grand jury investigation.