Monthly Archives: March, 2023

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s race for the Supreme Court is only going to get more expensive from here.

Republican Party Chairman Brian Schimming and Wisconsin Democratic Party boss Ben Wikler appeared together on WisPolitics' Newsmaker program over the weekend.

Schimming said there is more money coming to help conservative Justice Dan Kelly in the final three weeks of the race.

“We’ve raised more money in this year alone than we did in all of 2021, and almost all of 2022,” Schimming said. “The fundraising is going really well. And the grassroots support has been terrific.”

Kelly is behind in the money race, almost two-to-one.

WisPolitics says he, and the groups who support him, have spent a little over $5 million in the race for Supreme Court.

Liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz, and the groups that support her, have spent over $10 million.

And Wickler said Democrats are willing to raise whatever money is necessary to finish the race.

“We’re putting out word to anyone who cares about the future of freedom and Democracy that this race is for all the marbles,” Wickler explained. “Wisconsin is the pivotal state in the country in the Electoral College. The Senate race, to re-elect Tammy Baldwin. The presidential election in 2024. There are House seats on the line. And for the future of freedom in Wisconsin, to access a safe and legal abortion. All those reasons make this race so high stakes.”

The Democratic Party of Wisconsin already gave Protasiewicz $2.5 million for her campaign, and Wickler said there will be more if necessary.

Schimming was quick to say more than 90% of Protasiewicz’s money is from out of state, but added Kelly has been busy raising cash in Wisconsin.

Wisconsin’s race for Supreme Court has already topped $15 million in spending, making it the most expensive Supreme Court race in U.S. history.

Voters head to the polls April 4th.

(The Center Square) – Gov. Tony Evers hopes at least some of his budget makes Wisconsin’s final spending plan for the next two years.

Evers said during an appearance on Wisconsin Eye’s Newsmakers last Friday that he and the Republicans who control the budget-writing process have a new relationship after his reelection last November.

“We are in a position where it’s less contentious,” Evers said. “That doesn’t mean, necessarily, that there’s gonna be different outcomes. But there is a lot less anger. People understand that I’m going to be governor for at least the next four years.”

Wisconsin’s Republican budget chiefs, Rep. Mark Born, R-Beaver Dam, and Sen. Howard Marklein, R-Spring Green, last week said their relationship with the governor hasn’t changed.

“If you watched his State of the State Address or his Budget Address it was hard-left partisan rhetoric. If you look at his budget it’s the same bad idea, bad ideas, reckless spending,” Born said.

Gov. Evers is proposing the largest budget in Wisconsin history, $104 billion for two years.

Evers on Friday defended the record-spending.

“There are things that crop up that need to be addressed,” Evers explained. “You just can’t say ‘We’re not going to fund schools this year because we are going to take care of PFAS.'"

Republicans have already declared most of the governor’s budget dead on arrival.

But the governor did say there will be some agreement on some things. Namely the personal property replacement tax that Wisconsin’s businesses have fought against for years.

“We will [repeal the personal property tax]. The issue has always been we need to make sure that the municipalities and others that reap those taxes are held harmless,” Evers said.

Born and Marklein also hope to reach an agreement with Democrats on a stadium-funding deal for the Brewers, and a tax cut for families in Wisconsin.

Gov. Evers wants a tax cut too. He said he just wants a cut for different families in Wisconsin.

“It’s just my belief, and I think most people in Wisconsin understand, that tax cuts should be for the middle class,” Evers added. “And not the people who can afford it the most.”

The Republican-controlled, budget-writing Joint Finance Committee is meeting in private to gauge budget priorities. Budget listening sessions will come after that. The lawmakers will begin to actually write the new state spending plan after that.

(The Center Square) – The University of Wisconsin is moving toward its first tuition increase in a decade.

UW President Jay Rothman told lawmakers on Thursday that he will ask regents to raise tuition by 5%, starting next fall.

"After more than a decade of frozen tuition rates and as costs have increased and more particularly in recent years, inflation has accelerated, it is essential that we seek this increase for the long-term financial viability of our universities and to sustain the quality of education and research and services that we provide," Rothman said in a hearing before the Assembly Committee on Colleges and universities.

Rothman also asked for nearly $2 billion for new buildings on UW campuses, as well as millions of dollars more to pay for free-tuition programs at the UW’s other campuses, and to cover the cost of inflation.

“We are requesting a 4% general purpose revenue increase in the 2023 year, and a 4% increase in the following year in support of general operating budgets for the UW System,” Rothman explained.

Wisconsin lawmakers froze tuition at the UW System back in 2013. They lifted that freeze in 2021, but warned UW managers against rising tuition too quickly or too high.

Tuition at UW schools varies by campus, and Rothman insists that even with the tuition hike, Wisconsin’s other campuses will remain affordable.

“The UW System already offers the most affordable public education system in the upper Midwest,” Rothman said. “No one compares to us.”

In-state tuition at UW-Madison, the state’s largest campus, is currently just under $11,000 a year. A five percent increase would push that total just over $11,000.

Out-of-state tuition is much higher, at nearly $40,000 a-year.

Rothman told lawmakers he plans to ask UW Regents to approve the tuition hike at their meeting later this month.

President Joe Biden pledged in a speech late Wednesday to ban “assault weapons,” but critics were quick to push back.

Biden made the statement during his remarks at the House Democratic Caucus Issues Conference.

“I know I make some of you uncomfortable, but that little state above me, in Delaware, is one of the — has the highest rate — one of the highest rates of gun ownership,” Biden said. "But guess what? We’re going to ban assault weapons again come hell or high water.”

Biden also called out “high-capacity magazines.” Those comments sparked pushback from critics who pointed to their Second Amendment protections.

“The loss of life is a tragedy whenever it occurs,” U.SS. Rep. Bob Good, R-Va., told The Center Square in response to Biden’s comments. “At the same time, the Second Amendment is not subject to interpretation by bureaucrats in Washington and cannot be taken away by Congress. Rather than confiscating firearms from law-abiding Americans, our priorities should be to protect and equip our police and crack down on violent crime."

Biden has taken a series of executive actions pushing the boundaries of his Constitutional authority, such as the eviction moratorium and COVID mandates, leading to legal challenges and rulings pushing back on Biden’s agenda.

The U.S. Supreme Court has recently bolstered gun rights. Last summer, the high court struck down a New York gun law that required residents to prove they had “proper cause” to receive a permit to carry a firearm outside the home.

As The Center Square previously reported, the court ruled 6-3 with Chief Justice John Roberts writing the opinion. Roberts wrote that the court “recognized that the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect the right of an ordinary, law-abiding citizen to possess a handgun in the home for self-defense.”

Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Chris Murphy, D-Conn., in January introduced the “Assault Weapons Ban,” which would “ban the sale, transfer, manufacture and importation of military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines and other high-capacity ammunition feeding devices.”

“It’s time we stand up to the gun lobby and remove these weapons of war from our streets, or at the very least keep them out of the hands of young people,” Feinstein said in a statement.

A companion bill has support from more than 200 Democrats but has not passed either Chamber this Congress.

“President Biden didn’t have the votes in Congress to get this ineffective and patently unconstitutional measure passed even when Democrats controlled the House,” Amy Swearer, Heritage senior legal fellow, told The Center Square. “He certainly doesn’t have the votes now, when the most recent polls show support for this type of law is lower now than it was in previous years. Unless the president plans on stripping Americans’ Second Amendment rights via executive fiat (a real ‘come hell, high water, or constitutional crisis’ scenario), then it’s difficult to see this as anything more than the President once again blowing smoke on behalf of Gun Control, Inc.”

The FBI has confirmed initial reports that the Biden administration is now saying the most likely source of COVID-19 is the virology lab in Wuhan, China.

The news comes after the Wall Street Journal reported that the Department of Energy gave classified briefings to key lawmakers and the White House saying the most likely origin of the virus was the lab in China.

“[FBI] Director Wray confirmed that the Bureau has assessed that the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic likely originated from a lab incident in Wuhan, China,” the agency said in a statement.

House Republicans have vowed to investigate the origins of COVID-19 and whether American taxpayer dollars may have played a role since the lab has received federal funding.

Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, and House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said they are widening their investigation into the matter.

“Uncovering the truth about the origins of COVID-19 is vital to U.S. national security, critical to the prevention of future pandemics, and will bring some semblance of closure to the families of those who lost loved ones during the pandemic,” the lawmakers wrote in a letter to the Biden administration, requesting documents, communications, records and more.

The Biden administration’s admission comes after Republicans were roundly mocked by other lawmakers and the media during the pandemic for making the same assertion, as The Center Square previously reported.

In 2020, the Associated Press called the idea a “myth.” The same year, The New York Times called it a “conspiracy theory,” and The Washington Post called it a “fringe theory.”

In 2021, social media companies like Facebook were taking down posts that claimed COVID-19 was man-made.

“FBI Director Wray confirmed on national TV that the FBI has thought COVID came from the Wuhan lab for a long time,” said House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La. “Republicans were right all along. But got called conspiracy theorists. Will the media and Big Tech be apologizing to us?”

Republican lawmakers blasted those tech companies and the media for “covering up” for China.

“The media originally labeled anyone who questioned China’s official COVID narrative as xenophobic, a conspiracy theorist, and more,” said Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., who was among the first to push the lab-leak theory. “They never did apologize for covering up for China. Worse, they’re still doing it.”