Tuesday, July 16, 2024
Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020, 2021, 2022 & 2023 Triple GOLD Award Recipients

Monthly Archives: January, 2024

Why Conservatives Embrace Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Timeless Message [WRN VOICES]

This Jan. 15, we celebrate Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Martin Luther King Jr. Day is commemorated on the third Monday of the month...

Huge Iowa Victory for Trump Could be First of Many

Former President Donald Trump is the heavy favorite to win Iowa's Republican presidential caucuses Monday, leading his closest challengers in polls by more than 30 percentage points.

RealClearPolitics Poll Average of major polls across the country shows Trump with more than 52% support in The Hawkeye State. His closest challenger there, former South Carolina Gov. and Ambassador Nikki Haley, shows 18.2% support, a nearly 34% percentage point gap between the No. 1 and No. 2 candidates in the state. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is an even more distant third with 15.6% support.

Monday's caucuses in Iowa – where temperatures are expected to hover just below 0 degrees and wind chills could hit minus 35 degrees or worse – are the first time voters get to weigh in during the Republican primary season.

Unlike a standard primary election where voters simply go to the polls and cast their ballots for the candidate of their choice (or in more recent years, mail in their ballots), voters at a caucus must show up in person and listen to supporters lobby for candidates before choosing sides.

A significant win by Trump in Iowa could all but deflate the candidacies of most – if not all – of the former president's Republican opponents.

Following Monday's caucuses, GOP voters in New Hampshire head to the polls Jan. 23 for the first-in-the-nation primary. Trump also holds a significant lead in polling there with 43.5% support, according to RealClear, but Haley has closed the gap down to about 14 percentage points with 29.3% support.

Trump leads all challengers by large amounts nationally as well. The latest The Center Square Voters' Voice Poll shows Trump with 61% support across the country, with Haley (13%) and DeSantis (12%) far behind.

Nevada follows with a Nov. 8 caucus, followed by primaries on Feb. 24 in South Carolina and Feb. 27 in Michigan (though not all delegates will be awarded on this date in Michigan; more than half will be awarded at the state convention March 2); and caucuses in Idaho March 2 and North Dakota March 4.

On Super Tuesday March 5, Republican voters from 15 states will select the candidate of their choice: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont and Virginia.

Trump could have the nomination locked up by then.

On Iowa, Colin Reed, a Republican strategist, former campaign manager for U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., and co-founder of South and Hill Strategies, told The Center Square: “For Trump, he needs to show a result that’s consistent with his lead in the polls or risk losing the veneer of inevitability,” Reed continued. “For DeSantis, he needs a decisive second place showing or loses a credible rationale to continue on. Nikki Haley placed more of her chips in New Hampshire so she has the least to lose and most to gain. Either way, the events in Iowa have the potential to reshuffle the deck in the eight days between the caucuses and New Hampshire primary.”

DeSantis received the coveted endorsement of Iowa's popular Republican governor, Kim Reynolds, but that hasn't helped him in polling there.

Trump also faces nearly 100 criminal charges across several states as well as ongoing efforts to remove him from the ballot for his role in the Jan. 6 protests at the U.S. Capitol. Translated, those challenges mean Trump’s campaign could be upended later this year and make second place in the GOP primary more important than ever.

Dan Knodl & Duey Stroebel: Evers’ Maps Pit Milwaukee Metro-Area GOP Legislators Against EACH OTHER

"They strategically took people out that they think are a concern to them," state Sen. Duey Stroebel, a Republican, told Wisconsin Right Now in...

Gov. Evers’ Maps Maliciously Pit Dozens of Republican Incumbents Against Each Other

“Do you expect me to relocate? To sell my house in three months time?” state Rep. John Macco, who was paired with a fellow...

Democrats Would Rather See Michelle Obama in the White House Than Biden; Poll Says

If Democrats had a magic wand, they'd put Michelle Obama in the White House.

The former first lady has more political star power than incumbent President Joe Biden and other famous and not-so-famous Democrats ahead of the November election, according to The Center Square Voters' Voice Poll, conducted Jan. 2-4.

The poll, conducted with Noble Predictive Insights, found that if Democrats and Democrat-leaning likely voters could wave a magic wand, 24% would pick Michelle Obama. The former first lady was followed by Biden (20%), U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (12%), someone else (9%), U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg (9%), former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (8%), Vice President Kamala Harris (7%), and U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (5%).

Three other Democrats didn't have as much appeal: Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer got 4%, followed by Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker (1%) and U.S. Sen. Raphael Warnock (1%).

Michelle Obama, the wife of former President Barack Obama, has strong support among Black and Hispanic Democratic voters, women and people younger than 55, according to the poll. Michelle Obama, who turns 60 on Jan. 17, recently spoke with Jay Shetty for an episode of his "On Purpose" podcast. During the podcast, she said she was terrified about the upcoming election.

"What's going to happen in this next election? I am terrified about what could possibly happen because our leaders matter," Michelle Obama said. "Who we select speaks for us. Who holds that bully pulpit, it affects us in ways that sometimes I think people take for granted."

"You know, the fact that people think that government, eh, you know, doesn't really even do anything and I'm like, 'oh my God, does government do everything for us,' " Michelle Obama said. "And we cannot take this democracy for granted. And sometimes I worry that we do."

Former President Donald Trump holds a significant lead over his challengers in the Republican primary heading into Monday's Iowa caucuses, the first time U.S. voters can officially weigh in on whom the GOP nominee should be. The Obamas have been vocal critics of Trump.

Previous The Center Square Voters' Voice Polls showed similar support for the former first lady.

"Michelle Obama currently has the best of multiple worlds," said David Byler, chief of research at Noble Predictive Insights, which conducted the polling. "She's a celebrity with near universal name recognition. She's beloved by Democrats who remember her years as First Lady. But she doesn’t have the string of failures and missteps that follow anyone who holds formal political office.

"In other words, she has all the goodwill that comes with the Obama brand but no record that a potential opponent could use against her. She's not running for office now – but if she chose to do so in a future cycle, she could be formidable," he said.

The poll with Noble Predictive Insights surveyed 2,573 Americans from Jan. 2-4, including about an even number of Republicans and Democrats along with 266 "true independents," which are independents who indicated they do not lean toward either party. The poll has a margin of error of about 2%.

In other results, Trump surpassed Biden by four percentage points nationally in The Center Square Voters' Voice poll.

Dr. Evil’s Maps #1: Gov. Evers Pits Top Assembly Leader Against Fellow Republican

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers has submitted such transparently partisan maps to the liberal-controlled state Supreme Court that we can only dub them "Dr. Evil's...

Milwaukee Public Schools Want $259 Million Tax Hike

(The Center Square) – Milwaukee Public Schools are going back to taxpayers for a quarter-billion dollars.

The city’s school board voted Thursday night to put a $259 million tax hike request on the April ballot.

MPS leaders say they need more money to maintain operations and keep up with rising costs.

"We can’t let our public school system fail," MPS Board vice president Jilly Gokalgandhi told the board.

"How many years are we supposed to keep getting kicked in the face?" board president Marva Herndon asked.

The tax hike request comes after state lawmakers signed off on a school funding increase in June and after voters approved an $87 million tax increase for Milwaukee Public Schools in 2020.

Will Flanders, an education expert at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, told The Center Square it’s unsurprising that MPS is once again asking taxpayers for more money.

“Like death and taxes, low-performing school districts demanding even more money from taxpayers is seemingly inevitable,” Flanders said.

MPS’s CFO told the school board the district will be looking at a $200 million deficit next school year. He warned about layoffs, frozen salaries, closed schools and fewer school buses if the referendum doesn’t pass.

Flanders said MPS already has plenty of money and is in line to get more.

“As it stands, MPS has nearly $19,000 per student. This doesn't even take into account the increases Gov. [Tony] Evers has set the district up for the next 400 years with his partial veto last year. Milwaukee taxpayers should carefully evaluate whether a district achieving less than 20% proficiency in reading and math should be rewarded with even more funding,” Flanders said.

Voters will have their say on the tax increase on the April ballot.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rejects New Legislative Maps Reconsideration

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s Supreme Court will not reconsider its ruling that tossed out the state’s political maps.

The new liberal-majority court ruled 4-3 against a request from Republican lawmakers to listen to arguments again.

Lawyers for the Republican-controlled legislature also said Friday’s deadline for new maps was too quick of a turnaround.

The liberal-majority court ruled just before Christmas that Wisconsin’s political maps from 2022 were too gerrymandered in favor of Republicans.

The court then ordered new maps for both the Wisconsin Assembly and Wisconsin Senate to be drawn before this spring’s primaries.

Gov. Tony Evers has said he intends to offer input on the new maps, but he said it will likely be up to the court’s experts to decide what the new legislative boundaries will be.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court didn’t offer an explanation with its decision.

The deadline for those maps is 5 p.m. today.

After that, experts hired by the court will either issue a report on new maps or will draw maps of their own.

Those maps are due to the court by Feb. 1. The Supreme Court has said Wisconsin’s new maps must be finalized by March 15 so they can be used in this year’s elections.

Milwaukee City Leaders Eying 15% Pay Hike & 3% Annually for Themselves

(The Center Square) – Less than two weeks after Milwaukee’s new sales tax took effect, city leaders are looking to spend some of that money on pay raises for themselves.

A city council committee approved a 15% pay raise for the mayor, city council members and top city workers like Milwaukee’s police and fire chiefs.

"The approval of these recommendations helps us move past being a stepping stone for other opportunities and instead a choice destination," Milwaukee Employee Relations Director Harper Donahue IV told city council members.

The pay raises would bump Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson’s salary to more than $169,000 a year. The raises would also increase the base pay for city council members to more than $84,000 a year.

Milwaukee’s police and fire chiefs would see their salaries jump to a little less than $200,000 a year, while the city’s public works boss would make more than $208,000.

The city estimates the raises will cost $1.8 million for the rest of 2024, and at least $2.8 million each year going forward. There is a provision in the pay raise proposal that would guarantee elected officials a 3% raise each year, starting next year, unless frontline city workers get a smaller raise.

Alderman Michael Murphy said city leaders have been making the same salary for the past 15 years.

“I do believe there should be an increase for elected officials. I don’t believe the number 15 is appropriate,” he said.

Alderman Scott Spiker said Milwaukee’s mayor didn’t mention anything about the pay raises when he pitched a new 2% sales tax for the city.

“You just asked for a sales tax and now you’re going to increase salaries for not just electeds but the folks who are most well compensated," Spiker added.

A spokesman for Milwaukee’s mayor said he supports the raises, as does city council President Jose Perez.

"I want the city to be competitive, I don't want to lose talent to other municipalities and even to the private sector, but with any increase I think it's only natural, it's pertinent for us to also increase accountability and fix the systems that are in place that prohibit the best service for our constituents," he said.

The pay raise proposal now goes to the full city council for a vote.

Hey, Media: The Handful of ‘Robin Vos’ Recall Clowns Are NOT a ‘Movement’

Some members of the media are currently in overdrive trying to elevate a handful of fringe, Robin Vos-obsessed clowns into a supposed "movement" representing...

‘Supreme’ Irony: WEC Letter Indicates Fringe Vos Recall Effort May Be Dead in Its Tracks

The Wisconsin Election Commission is examining whether a fringe recall effort against Assembly Speaker Robin Vos can even legally go forward in light of...

Gaylor: The New York Times’ Creepy Attack on Taylor Swift

In Swiftie jargon, the word “Gaylor” is used to describe ultra-invested creeps who grasp at any attempt to out Taylor Swift as gay or...

Lloyd Austin, Spending & Biden’s Idea of the ‘American Dream’ [Up Against the Wall]

Spending Bill Shut it down! Shut it down! Shut it down! According to FiscalData, the federal government spent $6.13 trillion dollars! That’s trillion with a T....

Hispanic, Black Support for Trump Push Him to Lead Over Biden in New Poll

Former President Donald Trump holds a lead over President Joe Biden heading into this presidential election year, the latest poll shows.

The Center Square Voters' Voice Poll, conducted Jan. 2-4, found that among likely voters, Trump holds 45% support compared to Biden’s 41% in a head-to-head faceoff, a lead that's outside of the poll's 2% margin for error with the Iowa Caucuses scheduled for Monday (Jan. 15).

The remaining 14% who responded they were “not sure” could swing the election in favor of either candidate.

The latest poll flips the script on the previous The Center Square Voters' Voice Poll conducted in October, when Biden held a 48% to 44% advantage over Trump. Other recent polls also show Trump with a significant lead over Biden in key swing states.

Trump’s lead is due in large part to his growing support among Hispanic and Black voters, which is higher than Republican presidential candidates have received in the past.

Trump has 10% support among Black voters compared to Biden’s 74%. While 10% is far lower than Biden’s support, it is actually much higher than Republican presidential candidates normally garner.

One portion of the survey allowed Republican voters to share why they prefer Trump over his primary competitors, such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, over whom he holds a wide lead.

A Black Trump supporter wrote, “he is really a man of his words and doesn’t have a lot of lobbyists telling him what to do or say.”

Among Hispanics, Trump has 45% support compared to Biden’s 38% support.

One Hispanic Trump supporter wrote, “I love that he isn’t afraid to be who he is.”

Another Hispanic Trump supporter wrote, “the stuff he has been saying and doing really makes me believe he can make an impact on the world nowadays. I mean look at gas prices. They went up 300% ever since Joe Biden got here as President.”

Trump has 49% support among white voters, compared to Biden’s 35% support.

Trump also does better than Biden with male voters, beating Biden 50% to 34%, according to the survey. Biden, though, does better with female voters, beating Trump with 45% support compared to Trump’s 39%.

Trump performs better than Biden across every age demographic except seniors age 65 and older. For that group, Trump and Biden are tied with 42% support. Each age demographic has a large percentage responding they remained “not sure,” ranging between 15% and 20%.

Elevated inflation, a crisis at the southern border, and ongoing overseas conflicts have chipped away at Biden’s support. Millions of illegal immigrants have poured into the U.S. since Biden took office, leading even Democratic mayors to raise the alarm. The chaotic and deadly withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan marked a downward turning point for Biden’s approval numbers, from which he has not recovered. Concerns over the U.S.’ role in Ukraine and the potential for the Israel-Gaza war to escalate are also a factor.

Inflation has slowed since spiking during Biden’s first two years as president, but prices still remain nearly 20% higher than when he took office. Mortgage rates peaked over 8%, making it much more difficult for many Americans to afford to buy a home.

Citing some of those concerns, The Center Square Voter’s Voice poll also found that 67% of Americans say the country is headed in the wrong direction, a tough statistic to overcome for the incumbent president. The poll also found the majority of Americans disapprove of Biden’s handling of the economy, which is consistently a top issue for voters of both parties.

The poll was conducted in conjunction with Noble Predictive Insights and surveyed 2,573 Americans from Jan. 2-4, roughly even number of Republicans and Democrats as well as 266 “true independents,” which are independents who indicated they do not lean toward either party. The poll has a margin of error of about 2%.

Badger Institute Acknowledges ‘Real Facts’ Researcher’s Pro Marijuana Legalization Bias

The Badger Institute's president acknowledged Tuesday that the sole author listed on their published "Real Facts" policy briefs on marijuana legalization personally favors legalization...

Federal Court Strikes Down California’s Broad Restrictions on Concealed Carry

A panel of the 9th Circuit Court court struck down California’s ban on concealed carry permit users bringing their guns to many places outside the home, following an earlier federal district court’s injunction in December against the ban, then another 9th Circuit judge’s overturning of the injunction.

2023 bill SB 2 took effect on January 1 and banned concealed carry permit holders from bringing their certified firearms to most public places — even privately-owned commercial establishments open to the public unless its operator “clearly and conspicuously posts a sign” indicating license holders may carry their firearms on the property.

California concealed carry applicants undergo thorough background checks that include interviews, fingerprinting, reviews through multiple government databases, and pass a state-certified full-day handgun training program designed for concealed carry permit holders.

“Extremist judges have overturned CA's gun law and are insisting that guns be allowed at our playgrounds, libraries, and hospitals,” said California governor Newsom in a public statement. “This is exactly why we need to pass a US Constitutional Amendment that will put in place common sense reforms like: universal background checks, a ban on assault weapons, [and] raising the age to purchase a gun to 21.”

An injunction against the law was first issued in December by a district court judge who ruled “SB2 turns nearly every public place in California into a 'sensitive place,' effectively abolishing the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding and exceptionally qualified citizens to be armed and to defend themselves in public.”

Notably, the lawsuit against SB 2 did not challenge and the injunction did not block “sensitive place” designations regarding school zones, preschools, state or local public buildings, airports, or legislative offices.

California attorney general Rob Bonta appealed against the injunction, first seeking an administrative stay against the district court’s injunction through the 9th Circuit Court, which was granted. An administrative stay typically serves as a “judicial pause” while a court takes time to consider the merits of a case in a more long-term ruling.

As successfully argued by the lawyers representing the concealed carry permit users in their stay appeal, administrative stays are typically used to “preserve the status quo pending a determination of the action on the merits” by serving as a judicial pause, and that the court’s stay was a departure from this legal precedent. With the dissolving of the administrative stay, SB 2’s challenged limitations on concealed carry are no longer in effect.

The 9th Circuit is set to hear arguments for the case in April.

Ranked-Choice Voting in Wisconsin is a Trojan Horse [WRN Voices]

I had the distinct pleasure of watching more than one American election from a distant war zone—one struggling through its own fledgling attempts at...

Badger Institute Is Pushing Pro Legalization Advocate’s ‘Facts’ on Marijuana Reform

The Badger Institute, an ostensibly conservative Wisconsin think tank run by a former Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reporter, appears to be building the case for...

Unborn Baby Initially Saved in Milwaukee Reckless Driving Crash Dies

Monique Stewart, a 32-year-old Milwaukee woman who was 8 months pregnant, was named as the woman who died when a reckless driver sped 100...

Dane County Absentee Ballot Ruling Chips Away at Wisconsin Election Laws [WRN Voices]

You’d think an “address” would be simple, and not require intervention by a Dane County judge opening the door to more ways to chip...

BREAKING: Reckless Driver Kills 32-year-old Pregnant Woman; Baby Saved, in Horrific Milwaukee Crash

The Milwaukee Police Department is investigating a fatal accident that occurred on 01/07/24 at about 4:26pm in the 7900 block of W. Brown Deer Rd. A white Chevy Equinox was traveling East on Brown Deer Rd at a high rate of speed and collided with a blue Dodge Caravan that was traveling West on Brown Deer Rd and turning North on Servite Drive. The driver of the white Equinox was 18 years old, taken into custody, and was the lone occupant. The driver of the Caravan was 62 years old and had three passengers ages 32, 8, and 8. All were conveyed to a local hospital. The pregnant 32-year-old was pronounced deceased. The infant was saved. All other occupants are expected to survive. Their conditions are stable. The investigation is ongoing. Charges are pending review by the Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office. Capt. Warren E. Allen Jr. Milwaukee Police Department Night Watch Commander 749 W. State Street Milwaukee, WI 53233 414-935-7313 The City of Milwaukee is subject to Wisconsin Statutes related to public records. Unless otherwise exempted from the public records law, senders and receivers of City of Milwaukee e-mail should presume that e-mail is subject to release upon request, and is subject to state records retention requirements. See City of Milwaukee full e-mail disclaimer at www.milwaukee.gov/email_disclaimer

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Trump’s Appeal of Colorado Ballot Case in February

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear an appeal from former President Donald Trump next month on whether a Colorado Supreme Court ruling could keep him from appearing on the March Republican presidential primary ballot.

After a regularly scheduled conference on Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court said it's granting a writ of certiorari from Trump’s legal team and scheduled oral arguments for February 8. The Colorado Republican Party also filed a request for the court to hear an appeal of the Colorado Supreme Court decision.

“Coloradans, and the American people, deserve clarity on whether someone who engaged in insurrection may run for the country's highest office,” Democratic Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said in a statement after the U.S. Supreme Court's announcement. “I urge the Court to prioritize this case and issue a ruling as soon as possible.”

Other states have attempted to remove Trump from the presidential primary ballot, stating his role in events on Jan. 6, 2021, should disqualify him under the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution. However, Colorado was the only state to have a case make it to its state Supreme Court and have a ruling against Trump. Last week, Democratic Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows stopped Trump from appearing on the state’s presidential primary ballot. Trump then filed a lawsuit against Bellows’ action.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s action triggers a stipulation in the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling that automatically places Trump on the ballot for the Republican presidential primary. Friday was the deadline for Griswold to certify the names and party affiliations for candidates on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.

“Colorado’s 2024 Presidential primary ballot is certified,” Griswold said. “The United States Supreme Court has accepted the case, and Donald Trump will appear on the ballot as a result.”

Colorado’s ballots are scheduled to be sent to military and overseas voters on Jan. 20 and ballots are scheduled to be mailed to the state’s active registered voters on Feb. 12, according to Griswold’s office.

This story is developing and may be update.

Iowa Caucuses Could Seal The Deal For 2024 Race

The Iowa Caucuses are scheduled for Jan. 15, leaving just over a week of breakneck campaigning before what could be a decisive day in the Republican primary.

The Iowa Caucuses provide an opportunity for underestimated candidates to nab a key win by focusing their time and money on the early state. A victory there can help build steam and boost fundraising before the following primary later this month: New Hampshire.

A poor performance in Iowa, though, can end an already struggling presidential campaign or at least raise doubts about its viability.

“We’re moving away from persuasion and into the expectation-setting phase of the campaign,” Colin Reed, a Republican strategist, former campaign manager for U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., and co-founder of South and Hill Strategies, told The Center Square. “Voters in the early states have been getting hammered for months with candidate events, town halls, ads, meet and greets. There’s less and less new information likely to change their minds.”

Goals vary for each candidate, Reed said. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and former South Carolina Governor and U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley appear to be duking it out for second place.

“For Trump, he needs to show a result that’s consistent with his lead in the polls or risk losing the veneer of inevitability,” Reed continued. “For DeSantis, he needs a decisive second place showing or loses a credible rationale to continue on. Nikki Haley placed more of her chips in New Hampshire so she has the least to lose and most to gain. Either way, the events in Iowa have the potential to re-shuffle the deck in the eight days between the caucuses and New Hampshire primary.”

The last Republican debate before Iowa voters weigh in is scheduled for Jan. 10 to be hosted by CNN, which announced that only DeSantis and Haley will participate. Trump will again skip this debate, opting for a Fox News Town Hall the same night.

Notably, billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy will be absent from the debate after CNN said he did not qualify. Former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie did not qualify either.

Ramaswamy made headlines for his recent endorsement from Steve King, a long-time Iowa congressman who was primaried out of his seat amid controversy over his comments about white supremacy.

“If you want someone who is going to take on the deep state and speak truth to power, then vote for someone who is going to speak the truth to YOU,” King, 74, said in a statement.

DeSantis, who has been campaigning hard in the Hawkeye State, has repeatedly touted his support from the state’s governor, Kim Reynolds.

A coveted endorsement, Reynolds praised DeSantis in her November endorsement remarks, calling him "someone who calls out our moral decline for what it is, who looks to the future and not the past, someone who most importantly, can win.”

The Trump campaign, though, has run ads featuring Reynolds’ past positive comments about Trump, something Reynolds has called “misleading.”

The latest polling, though, is on Trump’s side. While Trump dominates national polling, his opponents perform better in Iowa. Trump also faces nearly 100 criminal charges across several states as well as ongoing efforts to remove him from the ballot for his role in the Jan. 6 protests at the U.S. Capitol. Translated, those challenges mean Trump’s campaign could be upended later this year and make second place in the GOP primary more important than ever.

The latest polling aggregation and analysis from FiveThirtyEight, a top polling firm, has Trump with 50% support in Iowa. DeSantis follows with 18.4% support, Haley at 15.4% and Ramaswamy at 6%. Christie has 3.7% support.

Nationally, Trump polls better with about 62% support in the Republican primary, more than all his challengers combined. DeSantis and Haley are roughly tied for second with about 12% and 11% support, respectively.

Being Born at the Right Time [Up Against the Wall]

As we enter another new year following a retirement of one of my co-workers who worked with me for 30 years, I am reminded...

Yes, Virginia, there IS a War on Christmas! [WRN Voices]

Another Christmas season has come and gone.  A month of faith, family gatherings, goodwill, feasts, etc.  Most people look forward to December and all...

Cities Across America React to Buses Carrying Migrants to Their Doorstep

From the small towns of Woodstock, Illinois, and Secaucus, New Jersey, to the metropolises of Denver, New York and Chicago, municipalities are starting to take action against the infusion of migrants from Texas.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's 16-month policy of exporting the border crisis to sanctuary cities by busing migrants out of Texas has exasperated big city leaders and sounded alarms in nearby towns.

Denver Mayor Mike Johnston told the City Council members this week that the infusion of migrants being bused from Texas to their city would cost $180 million in 2024 and is not sustainable.

In nearby Aurora, about 15 miles east of Denver, City Council Member Danielle Jurinsky said that the Denver mayor was renting hotel rooms in Aurora and putting up migrants without the approval of the Denver City Council. Jurinsky stated at the Dec. 4 city council meeting that Aurora residents at extended-stay hotels were put out on the street because the migrants were taking all the available hotel rooms.

According to a video of the meeting, Jurinsky said "this is Denver Mayor Mike Johnston busing migrants into the city of Aurora, taking up our hotels, and throwing out American citizens, Aurora residents onto the streets."

New York City filed a lawsuit Jan. 4 against the 17 charter bus and transportation companies from Texas that are bringing migrants to the city asking for $708 million in costs.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams issued an executive order that required buses carrying migrants to provide 32 hours notice before dropping off people at a designated location in Manhattan only during specified hours. The drop off times are limited to the hours of 8:30 a.m. and noon. Violators are subject to fines and the impounding of their bus.

Secaucus, New Jersey, is about nine miles northwest of New York City.

That city reported on Jan. 3 that a total of 23 buses carrying 1,107 migrants arrived at New Jersey train stations. In what officials believe is an effort to get around the New York City restrictions, the buses dropped off the migrants at the train stations and the migrants than took trains into the Big Apple.

“It seems quite clear the bus operators are finding a way to thwart the requirements of the Executive Order by dropping migrants at the train station in Secaucus and having them continue to their final destination”, Secaucus Mayor Michael Gonnelli said in a statement. "Perhaps the requirements Mayor Adams put in place are too stringent and are resulting in unexpected consequences as it seems the bus operators have figured out a loophole in the system in order to ensure the migrants reach their final destination, which is New York City."

Gonnelli hinted that New Jersey may also take action in response to migrants being bused to his state.

"In a recent call with State officials, they stressed that plans are in place in the event migrants decide to remain in the State," Gonnelli said in a statement. "I made it very clear to those on the call that the Town of Secaucus would not be in a position to shoulder the burden of this situation and stressed the importance of open communication and cooperation with our County and State partners.”

Gonnelli added: "I plan to do everything I can to be prepared to do what is best for our community."

In Chicago, the city reported it impounded and towed a bus on Dec. 13 that was transporting 49 passengers coming from Eagle Pass, Texas, for attempting to drop off individuals without a permit. The City Council has passed a "bus safety ordinance" that same day that empowered it to impound any bus that didn't follow what the city called "safety protocols."

But nearby Chicago communities are discovering they are also being affected by the arrival of migrants.

Woodstock, Illinois, is about 67 miles northwest of Chicago with a population of 25,600 and a police force of less than 45 employees.

On Jan. 2, the Woodstock City Council called a special meeting to pass an ordinance that requires buses carrying migrants to file for application that must be filed five days prior to arrival. It requires the transportation company give a "detailed plan" identifying how the migrants will be cared for including housing and food and a list of each person with contact information who will be responsible for the care of the migrants. A city official can deny the application if "a satisfactory plan has not been presented related to the ability of the applicant to care for, house and feed such individuals."

The city of Joliet, Illinois, passed a similar ordinance on Jan. 2. Other suburban cities have also followed suit.

Abbott has not backed down.

On Dec. 20, Abbott's press secretary Andrew Mahaleris announced on X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter, how the state would respond to Chicago's crack down on buses.

"Because Mayor Johnson is failing to live up to his city's 'Welcoming City' ordinance by targeting migrant buses from Texas, we are expanding our operation to include flights to Chicago," Mahaleris stated Dec. 20 on X. "Texas’ first flight departed El Paso yesterday with over 120 passengers."

"Sanctuary cities like NYC & Chicago have seen only a FRACTION of what overwhelmed Texas border towns face daily," Abbott posted Jan. 2 on social media. "We will continue our transportation mission until Biden reverses course on his open border policies."

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine Bans Transgender Surgeries on Minors in Ohio

Ohio Republican Gov. Mike DeWine banned transgender transition surgeries on minors with an executive order Friday.

The move comes a week after he vetoed House Bill 68, which banned the practice and required single-sex sports teams to be established at schools, colleges and universities throughout the state.

“A week has gone by, and I still feel as firmly about that as I did that day,” DeWine said. “I believe parents rather than government should be making those important medical decisions.”

DeWine’s order and subsequent rules proposed for transgender health care for adults and children were the only issues addressed by DeWine on Friday.

“This is something that the entire time when I talked to families, not once did they mention they want to have surgery on their minor child. That was never mentioned,” DeWine said. “This just assures everybody that that will never happen.”

The rules up for public comment with the Ohio Department of Health and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction include protections for adults and children receiving transgender care in the state hospitals that would stop what DeWine called “fly-by-night” providers or clinics giving out medications without quality care.

The rules would also require multi-disciplinary teams at hospitals to provide support care, including psychiatrists and a comprehensive plan of the risks associated with the treatment and required mental health counseling.

"I’m doing it because it’s important that we do it,” DeWine said. “When I really started looking at this, these were some holes that need to be filled. One, we needed data. We don’t have data on this. Whatever the Legislature does, we’re going through with this. I spent time looking at this and talking to people, and it’s clear the most important thing with this is mental health counseling. It needs to be lengthy, and it needs to be comprehensive.”

The bill DeWine vetoed would prohibit gender-affirming care, such as hormone blockers, hormone replacement therapy and surgery for transgender youth.

It would also require K-12 schools, state colleges and universities and private colleges and universities to have separate single-sex teams for each sex. It also creates legal remedies for violations.

Republicans in the House and Senate have enough control in each chamber to override DeWine’s veto. They have until the session ends at the end of this year to do it.

Earlier this week, neither the House nor the Senate had sessions planned until later in the month. However, the House changed Wednesday’s “if needed” session date to an actual scheduled session.

Trump’s Access to Illinois’ Ballot Challenged

With former President Donald Trump’s access to Illinois’ primary ballot being challenged, it’s possible his name could appear on the Republican ticket but with a condition.

Nominating petitions for presidential electors are being filed this week to the Illinois State Board of Elections. Elections board spokesman Matt Dietrich said the board can’t discuss the nature of objections.

“Because we do not release anything related to objections until they are in the hands of a hearing officer,” Dietrich told The Center Square. “That’s not going to happen until Jan. 17.”

The Chicago Sun-Times reports that objectors, using the 14th Amendment, claim that Trump is barred for encouraging protestors to storm the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Trump has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court similar moves from Colorado and Maine.

“It’s time to put a STOP to all of these vicious attempts to REMOVE my name from the ballot,” Trump said in a fundraising email. “That’s why my attorneys have officially APPEALED to the SUPREME COURT to keep my name on the 2024 ballot once and for all.”

Dietrich said Illinois' objections will be given to a hearing officer, with a recommendation eventually to be made to the bipartisan elections board.

“So you cannot have … one party unilaterally making any decisions,” Dietrich said. “It takes at least five votes to make a board order effective.”

Dietrich said it’s likely Trump’s name will be certified for the ballot Jan. 30, but with a note that an objection is pending. Whatever the outcome of the elections board, it’s expected the case could be taken to the Illinois courts.

“And that can wind its way all the way up to the Illinois Supreme Court if necessary,” he said. “So it’s possible that’s what could happen with this case.”

The Illinois GOP said it doesn’t take sides in primaries.

“We believe the people, not activist courts, should choose who represents them in the White House,” Illinois GOP Chairman Don Tracy said in a statement to The Center Square. “This attempt to remove President Trump from the ballot without due process is an anti-democracy attempt to limit the voting rights of Illinois citizens and should be dismissed outright.”

The primary in Illinois is March 19. The General Election is Nov. 5.

Kevin Bessler contributed to this report.

Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson Insults Suburbanites, Thinks They All Eat at Cracker Barrel

Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson apparently thinks everyone in the suburbs eats at "Cracker Barrel" and considers the chain a "fine dining experience." It would...

Police Officers Shot in the Line of Duty Hit New High in 2023

A new report shows the number of police officers shot on the job hit a new high in 2023.

The National Fraternal Order of Police, a national police group with nearly 400,000 members, released the report, which showed 378 officers were shot in the line of duty in 2023, up 14% from the previous year, when 330 were shot.

Of the 378 shot this year, 46 died from their injuries.

A graphic from the report shows the significant increase in recent years as well as the breakdown by state.

The report goes on to say that there were 115 "ambush-style" attacks on officers in 2023, leading to 20 fatally shot officers.

Patrick Yoes, National President of the Fraternal Order of Police, blasted the "Defund the Police" movement, saying it led to a spike in shootings that has not decreased. That movement took off after the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis and the ensuing Black Lives Matter riots around the country.

"With the COVID-19 pandemic behind us and after so many Americans have seen the tragic consequences of the defund the police movement, it was our hope that these numbers would be a high-water mark," Yoes said. "We were wrong.

"Thankfully, because of dramatic improvements in medical trauma science and anti-ballistic technology, the lethality of these attacks has been reduced and only 46 of the officers shot in the line of duty were killed," he added.

Yoes has advocated for Congress to pass the Protect and Serve Act, which creates federal criminal penalties for those who target police officers.

"Truthfully, the violence against those sworn to protect and serve is beyond unacceptable; it's a stain on our society, and it must end," he said. "It is incumbent upon our elected officials and community leaders to stand up, support our heroes, and speak out against the violence against law enforcement officers."

Most Read