Monday, March 3, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Monday, March 3, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

A Terrifying Tax Case on ‘Unrealized Gains’ [Up Against the Wall]

spot_img

There’s a case pending in the U.S. Supreme Court that will decide the fate of this great nation as well as decide your individual fate. If the court decides to in favor of the IRS, we’re in deep, deep trouble.

What the IRS wants is to tax a paper change in the value of your assets – they call it a tax on unrealized gains, which sounds like it’s reasonable, you know, a tax on your gains, until you find out that they want to tax gains you were never paid, i.e. value you have not received in the form of any cash or profit, but you’ll still have to pay the tax anyway.

To explain this in simple terms, if the IRS wins, you’ll be paying taxes on gains in your home value that you never received because you didn’t sell the house. You’ll pay taxes on gains from a mutual fund investment you made but which you didn’t sell. The same with stocks you bought, but didn’t sell yet. Your stock value goes up, surprise tax! The value goes down, so sorry, no refund for you. Heads the IRS wins, tails you lose! It’s a lovely setup. 😉 Although the Supreme Court case involves U.S. shareholders in foreign corporations, a decision upholding the constitutionality of taxing unrealized gains could be seized on by the left to create broader implications.

The vast majority of Americans don’t understand the history of the income tax and how it directly relates to economic booms and busts. Liberals in particular don’t want this story told because it runs contrary to everything they want – and what they want is your money. President Biden and Congressional Democrats have also made an attempt to tax unrealized gains through the legislative process. Although they would target the wealthiest taxpayers, it’s a slippery slope that could spread.

The first thing to know is that our great nation thrived just fine without an income tax for 137 years! That’s right, there was no income tax until 1913. You got to keep 100% of what you earned! I know, I know, it’s hard to believe, but it’s true. Just see the chart below.

Unrealized gains

The next thing you’ll notice is that the income tax started at about a modest 7%, but politicians couldn’t help themselves, they raised tax rates almost immediately after passing the income tax bill, many years before WWI to about 77%. Yes, you paid almost 77 cents on every (marginal) dollar you earned. Then look at what happened. When Calvin Coolidge came into power, the income tax rate was lowered to about 24%, and guess what happened? The economy took off. Remember the Roaring Twenties? That wasn’t magic; it was Americans keeping more of their own money.

Then look at what happened next. Hoover got higher import taxes passed, other nations retaliated and raised their import taxes, trade slowed to a trickle, and then your elected officials raised tax rates to over 60% just to really stick it to the American people. (The Federal Reserve Bank piled on too – tightening credit and the money supply to choke off the economy.)

This led to FDR getting elected, and he raised tax rates even more – including raising the lowest marginal income tax rates on the poor – yes, that’s right, FDR raised the tax rate on the lowest income Americans to about 20%. So much for his claims to be looking out for the average Joe. The highest income earners also got choked off with a tax rate that topped 80% and then 90%. Yes, you paid 90 cents on every marginal dollar earned. (I won’t calculate the total tax based on the marginal rates.) And now you know why we had the Great Depression. FDR doubled down on Hoover’s bad tax policies, stealing almost every single penny that Americans earned.

Then what happened? President Kennedy took office and lowered the top marginal rate from 90% to 70%, and surprise, the economy took off again. Rates stayed there until Reagan lowered the top rate to about 50% and then he lowered the top rate again to 28%, and the economy boomed even more. But then Clinton had to come along and spoil the fun, raising taxes and causing the economy to falter. In fact, the real estate industry went into a recession until he reversed course one year later.

Have you noticed a pattern yet? A high marginal tax rate causes recessions while lowering rates results in economic growth. This ain’t rocket science. It’s a simple relationship that liberals don’t seem to understand, or more likely I believe, they do understand but don’t want Americans to know about it. hey still hold up FDR and his socialist policies as some kind of miracle maker, but it was WWII and all the buying of arms from the allies that got America out of the FDR Great Depression.

And libs never talk about the fact that Reagan correctly calculated the optimal tax rates that would produce the maximum tax revenue for the government, which is about 25% to 28% for the top rate and 15% for the lowest rate. Unfortunately, liberals still like to pretend that raising tax rates above this will produce more total revenue; but it doesn’t. They do this to create class warfare.

What raising tax rates does do, is tank the economy and hurt all Americans. Their real goal is to just take your money, but they fail to consider that you will change your behavior at higher and higher tax rates; i.e. you will work less, invest less, take fewer risks, hire less, and maybe even just stop working because it isn’t worth it.

History proves that if you have to give up 50% to 90% of your income to the thieves in the government, you will work less or stop working. The result? Lower total tax revenue, but they don’t care. It’s about the show – the appearance of taxing higher incomes more to show lower-income Americans that they are hurting those higher-income families in order to turn one group against another – so they can get elected.

So there’s your history lesson on tax rates. Let’s repeat history – but make it Reagan’s history of lower tax rates.


On October 18 and November 23, 2023, Donald Trump tweeted out on Trump’s Truth Social account T. Wall’s October 6th column on Trump’s property valuations. T. Wall holds a degree from the UW in economics and an M.S. in real estate analysis and valuation and is a real estate developer. Disclaimer: The opinions of the writer are not necessarily those of this publication or the left!

Langdon Street Attacker

Susan Crawford Wished to ‘Fix’ Violent Langdon Street Attacker Who Brutally Beat Female UW-Madison Student

"I wish I could do something to fix Mr. Winslow's trauma that he's experienced," Judge...

Rep. Piwowarczyk: ROFR Violates Conservative Values, Stifles Free Market Competition

A newly proposed bill would grant at least two Wisconsin-based companies—the American Transmission Company (ATC)...
susan crawford

Susan Crawford Tried to Make Wisconsin Taxpayers Pay Spanish Train Company $66 Million

"The taxpayers for the state are paying the bill and not getting anything for it"...
Illegal Border Crossings Buses Carrying Migrants Northern Border Illegal Border Crossers Immigration Parole Illegal Immigrant Convicts Biden’s Immigration Policies

National Sheriffs Association Says About 700,000 ICE Arrest Warrants Nationwide

State and local law enforcement are being put in harm's way with Illinois’ migrant sanctuary policies, the Illinois Sheriffs Association says.

Association Executive Director Jim Kaitschuk said the National Sheriffs Association put out a note to their state partners that there are 700,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement administrative arrest warrants that are active. But, that doesn’t matter in Illinois.

“Illinois law enforcement is precluded and prohibited from participating in any activity that is solely related to civil enforcement,” Kaitschuk told The Center Square.

Illinois law, through the TRUST Act and The Way Forward Act, prohibits state and local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration officials if a civil detention order is the only thing ICE has against someone.

While Kaitschuk said they can cooperate when there are criminal orders, law enforcement not being able to cooperate with civil warrants can still cause security concerns.

“Unfortunately things do go wrong, right, and then we’re in a situation where you may not know anything about what’s occurring,” Kaitschuk said. “So, we’re kind of blind in those cases.”

Daily immigration arrests nationwide haven’t been comprehensively published, but some estimates are more than 21,000 immigration detentions across the country since Jan. 20, when President Donald Trump took office.

Last week, state Sen. Omar Aquino, D-Chicago, told a group of immigration advocates that Illinois will stand strong.

“You are not going to come into our house and just try to take people and separate families in this state,” Aquino said. “People have rights. They are human rights.”

Illinois law also limits ICE from using local county detention facilities. Kaitschuk said the state’s sanctuary policies prohibit police from even knowing whether they have a suspected illegal immigrant in their jail.

“And [ICE] they’re having to go to people’s houses and at the point in time, the problem then is that you may be subjecting people then that weren’t involved in any other criminal activity other than being here … not legally and open them up to being subjected to ICE at that point in time in that residence, as opposed to if they were at the jail, where they wouldn’t have been,” Kaitschuk said.

Illinois and Chicago officials are on the other side of the U.S. Department of Justice in litigation over migrant sanctuary policies. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is due in front of the U.S. House Oversight Committee Wednesday to discuss the city’s migrant sanctuary policies.

The 21 Foreign Nationals in the Milwaukee County Jail

There were at least 21 foreign nationals in the Milwaukee County Jail on a snapshot...
susan crawford

Wisconsin Child Rape Victim’s Haunting Statement to Judge Susan Crawford: ‘I Love Spaghetti & Mac N Cheese’

When it was Judge Susan Crawford's time to talk, she gave child rapist Curtis O'Brien...
Wisconsin's Rape Kit Strategy

EXCLUSIVE: Jill Karofsky Was an Architect of Wisconsin’s Rape Kit Strategy Before & During Brad Schimel’s AG Tenure

In multiple newspaper articles at the time, Jill Karofsky adamantly defended the Schimel DOJ's approach...
ryan withee

Ryan Withee, Missing: Where Is the Milwaukee Man?

“Yo, yo, I need help bro." That frantic-sounding message was written at 1:10 a.m. on April...
susan crawford

Brad Schimel Challenges Susan Crawford to Say ‘Men Are Men; Women Are Women’

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel is speaking out against Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' much-mocked...

Gov. Tony Evers Changes “Mother” to “Inseminated Person” in Budget Bill

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers introduced a budget bill this week that calls mothers an "inseminated...
josh kaul

‘Josh Kaul Called Me’: The Curious Timing of the AG’s ‘Fundraising’ Call

This is a column by Meg Ellefson, reprinted with permission from WSAU.com. This week, the unelected...

Susan Crawford’s ‘Mismanagement’ at DNR Led to ‘Terrible Time for Wisconsin Farmers’: Expert

As an official with the state DNR, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Susan Crawford orchestrated a...
brad schimel rape kits

Wisconsin DAs, Sheriffs Praise Brad Schimel For Fixing Rape Kit Backlog

Brad Schimel rape kit controversy: Top law enforcement officials say Susan Crawford is lying about...
susan crawford act 10

Act 10 Calculator: How Much More You’d Pay in Wisconsin Property Tax if It’s Overturned

"For an average Wisconsin home valued at $300,000, property taxes could increase by $624 or...
slinger trump sign

Slinger, Wisconsin Orders Elderly Couple to Take Down ‘God, Guns, Trump’ Sign

"We're battling to the end" - Cameron Merkel The Village of Slinger, Wisconsin, is ordering...
Daniel gonzales

How to Help Wounded Milwaukee Police Officer Daniel Gonzales

The Milwaukee Police Association has announced a donation fund to help wounded Milwaukee Police Officer...
brittany kinser

6 Things to Remember About Brittany Kinser’s Big Victory Tuesday

Moderate education reformer Brittany Kinser's big victory in a three-way primary on Tuesday night sets...
susan crawford

3 Killers of Dane Co. Man Will Soon All be Free Due to Judge Susan Crawford

They were involved in the brutal murder of a man who was beaten to death....
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Trump Gains More Ground in War Against DEI

A major shift is underway in the way large companies talk about and fund Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

President Donald Trump began the transition when he signed an executive order last month eliminating DEI policies and staff at the federal government and extending the anti-DEI policy to federal contractors.

Private companies, some of which had already begun the transition before Trump took office, remarkably began backing off their DEI policies, even if only symbolically with little internal change.

Costco resisted, pushing back on the Trump administration, but other major brands like Amazon Wal-Mart, Target, and Meta announced a pullback from DEI. Media reports indicated DEI discussions on earnings calls has plummeted.

Others, such as Wisconsin-based financial services company Fiserv, have not yet made a change, at least not publicly.

A murky legal future awaits companies willing to take the risk to stick with DEI policies, particularly in hiring.

Fiserv receives hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts.

According to Fiserv’s website’s Diversity & Inclusion page, the company is “committed to promoting diversity and inclusion (D&I) across all levels of the organization, in our communities and throughout our industry."

Fiserv says that it “partner[s] with people and organizations around the world to advance our D&I efforts and create opportunities for our employees, entrepreneurs around the world and the next generation of innovators.”

The company's diversity and inclusion page includes a careers section that discusses “engaging diverse talent” and events to connect with “diverse candidates.”

Critics of DEI initiatives and policies say they discriminate against white men and Asians and lead to hiring and promotion decisions based on factors such as race and sexual orientation rather than merit.

In its 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company boasted that "60% of director nominees for the 2024 annual meeting reflect gender or racial/ethnic diversity."

According to an April 2024 report from Payments Dive, Fiserv was “buoyed by sales to government entities” in Q1 of 2024 and reported $500 million in revenue from those contracts. The U.S. Coast Guard contracted with Fiserv in 2024 to help with payroll, according to HigherGov, among other government contracts.

Fiserv did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

A watershed moment against DEI came when during the Biden administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against longstanding affirmative action policies at American universities, one key example of white and Asian Americans being discriminated against.

Trump’s election has only solidified the new legal framework for what is permissible when considering race and gender in hiring, promotion, and workplace etiquette.

From Trump’s order:

In the private sector, many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism.

Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.

DEI has become increasingly controversial as activists use the moniker to advance every liberal policy on race and gender, often at taxpayer expense. In the federal government, DEI had become widespread and infiltrated into every part of governance, from racial quotas for promotions at the Pentagon to driving healthcare research at the National Institutes of Health.

At private companies, DEI policies guided investment decisions via ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) as well as personnel decisions with racial quotas for company board rooms. Those ideas are out of favor with the Trump administration.

Some of the companies resisting the shift from DEI could face legal action.

A coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to Costco alleging it is violating the law, as The Center Square previously reported.

“Although Costco’s motto is 'do the right thing,' it appears that the company is doing the wrong thing – clinging to DEI policies that courts and businesses have rejected as illegal,” the letter said.

This week, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against Starbucks for similar policies.

"By making employment decisions based on characteristics that have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well, Starbucks, for example, hires people by thumbing the scale based on at least one of Starbucks’ preferred immutable characteristics rather than an evaluation of an applicant’s merit and qualifications,” the lawsuit said. “Making hiring decision on non-merit considerations will skew the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri’s consumers."

A 2022 Starbucks document touts a DEI goal: “By 2025, our goal is to achieve BIPOC representation of at least 30% at all corporate levels and at least 40% at all retail and manufacturing roles.”

Bailey called the Starbucks policies discriminatory and illegal.

"With Starbucks’ discriminatory patterns, practices, and policies, Missouri’s consumers are required to pay higher prices and wait longer for goods and services that could be provided for less had Starbucks employed the most qualified workers, regardless of their race, color, sex, or national origin,” Bailey said. “As Attorney General, I have a moral and legal obligation to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks."

Vote Tuesday for Brittany Kinser If you Want Wisconsin Education Reform: Scott Frostman

The choice is clear. It’s not even close. It’s uncommon to have massive attention thrust...