Thursday, November 7, 2024
spot_imgspot_img
Thursday, November 7, 2024

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Evers Redistricting Map Analysis: GOP Strongly Favored to Retain Control of Legislature

spot_img

Evers/Court map actually reduces the number of highly competitive districts — the exact opposite of what anti-gerrymandering reformers have been demanding for 10+ years.

By: Joe Handrick, Executive Director of Common Sense Wisconsin

As has been well established, even under the Evers map the GOP is strongly favored to retain control of the Legislature. While Democrats have blamed “gerrymandering” for their failure to win legislative seats, the truth is that Democrats are so highly concentrated in Madison and Milwaukee that 50% of the statewide vote does not translate to winning 50% of the districts. In addition, Democrats continue to lose nearly all of the highly competitive districts. Candidates matter and Madison socialism does not sell well in rural Wisconsin.

Here is an overview of the partisan balance using a multi-race gubernatorial year composite:

Evers redistricting map

Note that the Evers/Court map actually reduces the number of highly competitive districts — the exact opposite of what anti-gerrymandering reformers have been demanding for 10+ years. The court moved seats that were highly competitive and made them DEM seats.

Under the old map, the GOP in the Assembly needed to win all of its seats and 3 of the 17 highly competitive seats for a majority. Under the new map the GOP needs to win 2 of 12 highly competitive seats for a majority.

The bigger Democratic opportunities may be seen in the Senate. The GOP under the old map needed to win 2 of 7 highly competitive seats. Now they need to win 2 of 5. The most notable change is in Senate District 5 (Kooyenga). Under the old map Walker carried that district by 5.9%. Under the new court map, Walker loses it by 6.4%. This district is up for election this year.


Evers Redistricting Map SCOWIS Decision

Biggest flaw in SCOWIS decision:

The court relied exclusively on the overall core retention to determine which map was the best “least change” map. But in the Milwaukee districts, where core retention is most important to protect the Voting Rights Act (VRA) districts, they disregarded least change in pursuit of a 7th Black assembly district. The result is not only a likely violation of the VRA, but a clear violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

The 6 Black districts (10-12 and 16-18) and the 2 Latino districts (8-9) were drawn or approved by the federal courts to comply with the VRA. Therefore, in no locale is it more important to try to enact least change (not just geographically, but demographically). The Evers map is clearly not a least change map for Milwaukee County. NOTE: The Common Sense LC (least change) map was drawn without partisan regard to be a benchmark of what a true least change map should look like.

Evers redistricting map

 

Here is another example from Milwaukee County where “least change” was ditched by the Court. This was clearly an attempt to achieve a partisan goal of harming a GOP member of the assembly. This is also an example of how the Court just ignored the law requiring minimal municipal splits.

Evers redistricting map

Voting Rights Act (VRA) Districts

VRA:

The federal courts over the past 30 years in Wisconsin sought to comply with the VRA through creation of districts that have at least 55% voting-age Black population. While there is not magic number of what constitutes VRA compliance, Senator Lena Taylor and others have argued that districts below 55% likely violate the VRA. The Wisconsin Court has dropped all Black districts below 55%.


14th Amendment

14th Amendment:

The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment prohibits racial gerrymandering — the use of race as the predominant factor used in drawing of districts. While drawing districts that meet the VRA, drawers must not permit race to be the predominant consideration at the expense of other criteria. The only way to get 7 districts to all be nearly identical (as Evers did) at ~50% Black is to focus solely on race and the racial makeup of each and every ward and to set aside core retention. Justice Roggensack in her dissent made this same point stating, “a majority of this court engages in racial gerrymandering contrary to the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the [U.S.] Constitution which prohibits separating voters into different voting districts based on the race of the voter”


US Supreme Court Appeal

Appeal:

To appeal to the US Supreme Court there must be a federal issue. Both the VRA and the 14th Amendment are federal issues, but the chances of a successful appeal remain a long shot. First, the SCOTUS tends to defer to states on redistricting and this decision was made by a state court. Second, the GOP is not in a great position to appeal because their map too drew a district that was below 55% Black voting age population (in fact, it was below 50%). A successful appeal likely needs to come from a minority interest harmed by the likely VRA or 14th Amendment Violations.

Note: The Legislature and Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty have now asked the Supreme Court to block the Evers’ maps.

Trump Will Win Wisconsin

Dane County Puts Trump Over the Top in Wisconsin

This is an opinion column. It’s time to celebrate. Dane County put Trump over the top....
kamala harris

Harris Concedes Election to Trump, Pledges to Help Him With Transition

Vice President Kamala Harris addressed her supporters and the nation at her alma mater Howard University in Washington, D.C. Wednesday afternoon, where she publicly conceded the race to former President Donald Trump.

Harris – the 60-year-old former California Attorney General and U.S. senator currently serving as vice president – called for loyalty to the U.S. Constitution and the peaceful transition of power in her speech.

She clearly conceded the race and pledged to help former President Donald Trump with the transition.

“My heart is full today, full of gratitude for the trust you have placed in me, full of love for our country and full of resolve,” Harris said to begin her remarks. “The outcome of this election is not what we wanted, not what we fought for, not what we voted for, but hear me when i say the light of America’s promise will always burn bright as long as we never give up and as long as we keep fighting.”

Harris thanked her family, supporters, her team, President Joe Biden, her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, and poll workers.

“Over the 107 days of this campaign we have been intentional about building community and building coalitions, bringing people together from every walk of life and background, united by love and country with enthusiasm and joy in our fight for America’s future,” Harris said. “And we did it with the knowledge that we all have so much more in common than what separates us.”

Harris’ comments come as voting results continued to pour in showing former President Donald Trump either winning or leading in all seven swing states, putting him over 300 electoral votes and a roughly 5 million vote lead in the popular vote.

Now, Harris is expected to certify the election in early January ahead of Trump's Jan. 20 inauguration.

“We must accept the results of this election,” Harris said in her remarks. “I also told [Trump] that we will help him and his team with their transition and that we will engage in a peaceful transition of power.

“While I concede this election, I do not concede the fight that fueled this campaign, the fight for freedom, for opportunity, for fairness and the dignity of all people,” Harris continued.

Harris reportedly called Trump to concede the race earlier Wednesday afternoon. Harris held off on addressing her supporters or calling Trump into the early morning Wednesday as results poured in and made her path to the White House impossible.

Trump gave his own remarks early Wednesday, promising a new “golden age” in America.

“Frankly, I believe this was the greatest political movement of all time, and maybe beyond,” Trump said, promising to “help our country heal.”

President Joe Biden also reportedly called to congratulate Trump, who outperformed expectations on Tuesday after indictments, assassination attempts and constant media criticism in a historic political comeback.

No president has had two nonconsecutive terms since Grover Cleveland, who was elected president for the second time in 1892.

In her speech, Harris laid out some of the policy or ideological issues that motivated her campaign, pledging to continue to fight for those ideas.

She also spoke an encouraging message to the young people in attendance at her speech.

“To everyone who is watching … this is not a time to throw up our hands,” Harris said. “This is a time to roll up our sleeves. This is a time to organize, to mobilize and to stay engaged for the sake of freedom and justice and the future that we all know we can build together.”

tammy baldwin eric hovde

Baldwin Declared Winner Over Hovde in Tight Wisconsin U.S. Senate Race

(The Center Square) – Incumbent Sen. Tammy Baldwin defeated Republican challenger Eric Hovde in a race declared Wednesday afternoon.

Baldwin held a lead of 28,958 votes with 49.38% of the vote to Hovde’s 48.52%.

“The voters have spoken and our campaign has won,” Baldwin wrote on social media. “Wisconsinites chose someone who always puts them first, shows up, listens, and works with everyone to get the job done. I'm proud to head back to the Senate to keep fighting for our workers, farmers, and families that make our state great.”

Wisconsinites chose someone who always puts them first, shows up, listens, and works with everyone to get the job done. I'm proud to head back to the Senate to keep fighting for our workers, farmers, and families that make our state great.

If the difference remains less than 1%, Hovde will automatically qualify for a re-count.

After the unofficial tallies are done, a canvas must be complete and filed by Nov. 19. Then Hovde would have three days from the time the final canvas is received to ask for a recount.

Republican leaders, including Wisconsin Republican Party Chairman Brian Schimming, pointed toward third-party candidate Thomas Leager, who received 28,717 votes in the U.S. Senate race. Leager was found to have been funded by Democratic firms and donors despite saying that he was recruited to run by the Patriots Run Project.

Schimming called Leager and the America First party a “fake candidate under a fake party name.”

“Democrats have to come in and pose as something they are not,” Schimming said.

Schimming said that he would work with Hovde’s campaign to determine if they will ask for a recount, saying it is a “very very close race.” That decision has not been made yet, Schimming said.

rebecca cooke

U.S. Rep. Van Orden Defeats Rebecca Cooke in District 3

(The Center Square) – Third District Congressman Rep. Derrick Van Orden defeated Rebecca Cooke in a race that was called late Wednesday morning by multiple outlets.

Van Orden, the Republican incumbent, had 51.35% of the vote with 211,696 to Cooke’s 48.65% with 200,556 votes in the district that includes Eau Claire and areas south of the city and extending east toward Oshkosh.

Incumbents won seven of the eight U.S. House seats in Wisconsin as the Republicans hold a 6-2 advantage in the state.

Republican Tony Wied topped Democrat Kristin Lyerly in the 8th District to fill an empty seat held by Republican Mike Gallagher until his April 24 resignation. Wied received 57.3% of the vote to Lyerly’s 42.7%.

Republican incumbent Reps. Bryan Steil (1st District), Scott Fitzgerald (5th District), Glenn Grothman (6th District) and Tom Tiffany (7th District) won races along with Democratic incumbents Mark Pocan (2nd District) and Gwen Moore (4th District).

Pocan represents a district including Madison and Moore represents Milwaukee.

Van Orden went back and forth during the race but ultimately did not schedule a debate.

Van Orden recently testified in front of the House Judiciary Committee about the effects of illegal immigration on Wisconsin on a statewide scale.

Van Orden fought back after Cooke incorrectly accused him of skipping a health care policy forum during the campaign.

The group organizing the forum, the Western Wisconsin Medical Society, called Cooke’s comments inaccurate and disappointing.

https://www.thecentersquare.com/wisconsin/article_3543096c-87f8-11ef-87e1-1bfc5f5a2ccc.html

eric hovde

Tammy Baldwin Pulls Ahead Because of Democratic Plant, Facebook Censorship

Facebook even removed a reader's post that said, "Vote for Hovde!" labeling it spam. Leftist Democrat...

Wisconsin Approves Constitution Change to Prevent Noncitizen Voting

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin voters approved a state constitution change requiring someone to be a citizen to vote in elections.

The ballot measure had 75% approval with more than 95% of the statewide voted tallied.

Currently, the Wisconsin constitution states that "Every United States citizen age 18 or older who is a resident of an election district" is a qualified voter; the ballot proposal would replace the phrase “every United States citizen” with “only a United States citizen.”

The ballot measure comes as leaders across the state called for a process for the state to check its voter rolls for noncitizens and remove them, ensuring election integrity in the state.

Currently, election commissions cannot check their rolls with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation to ensure an estimated 90,000 individuals who are currently legally in the state, who can get a drivers license, do not register to vote.

Several voting groups across the state spoke out against the ballot measure, including the League of Women Voters.

"The change from 'every' to 'only' is a downgrade to all of our voting rights," the group said. "The language changes our constitutionally protected voting rights from a guarantee for all citizens to a limitation that could be used to erode our voting rights."

Trump Won Wisconsin

Why Trump Won Wisconsin

On Tuesday morning, before the polls closed, we wrote a story called "15 Reasons Trump...
milwaukee seals broken

Milwaukee Central Count Meltdown: Seals Broken on 13 Ballot Tabulators, GOP Observers Say

The seals were discovered broken on multiple tabulator machines this afternoon at Milwaukee’s Central Count,...
Trump Will Win Wisconsin

15 Reasons Trump Will Win Wisconsin

We were both raised in Wisconsin, one of us in northwestern Wisconsin and the other...
Reduces $464M Bond Leaked Trump's Taxes Michaela Murphy Shenna Bellows Kicking Trump Off 2024 Ballot Fake Electors Lawsuit Classified Documents Trial Donald Trump Poll Documents Trial Trump’s Poll Numbers Spike After Indictment

Trump Sues CBS News in Texas Over Edited 60 Minutes Interview of Harris

Former President Donald Trump sued CBS News in federal court in Texas alleging it violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Trump sued CBS Broadcasting Inc. in U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas Amarillo Division alleging the network’s “partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference through malicious, deceptive, and substantial news distortion calculated to (a) confuse, deceive, and mislead the public, and (b) attempt to tip the scales in favor of the Democratic Party” in the 2024 presidential election, the 19-page brief states.

The lawsuit alleges CBS News violated the Texas Business and Commerce Code and the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA) when it aired two different versions of an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.

On Oct. 5 and 6, CBS News “aired two different versions of its 60 Minutes interview with Kamala” citing examples of the differences between the versions. In both clips, Harris is asked about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the clips include different statements by Harris.

“Millions of Americans, including residents of Texas and this District, were confused and misled by the two doctored Interview versions,” the lawsuit alleges. “President Trump commented on the matter, writing on Truth Social: ‘In normal times, what happened on 60 Minutes, (deceptively ‘doctoring’ her answers), would be THE END OF ANYONE’S CAMPAIGN! Kamala is slow, incoherent, and in no way qualified to be President of the United States. RELEASE THE TAPES FOR THE GOOD OF AMERICA. We can do it the nice way, or the hard way!”

He also called for CBS News’ broadcasting license to be rescinded.

In response to widespread criticism of the interview by multiple outlets that alleged CBS edited the interview, CBS News issued a statement, saying the accusations were false.

“60 Minutes gave an excerpt of our interview to Face the Nation that used a longer section of her answer than that on 60 Minutes. Same question. Same answer. But a different portion of the response. When we edit any interview, whether a politician, an athlete, or movie star, we strive to be clear, accurate and on point. The portion of her answer on 60 Minutes was more succinct, which allows time for other subjects in a wide ranging 21-minute-long segment,” it said.

The brief states that CBS’s statement concedes that “Trump was accurate in his assertion that the interview with Kamala was doctored to confuse, deceive, and mislead the American People in order to try and interfere in the election on behalf of Kamala.”

After the interview aired, Trump’s counsel sent a letter to CBS demanding that it “immediately provide and publicly release the full, unedited transcript of the interview,” which it declined to do.

The Center for American Rights also filed a formal broadcast distortion complaint with the Federal Elections Commission. The different versions of the interview that aired “amount to deliberate news distortion – a violation of FCC rules governing broadcasters' public interest obligations,” CAR said. It also demanded that “CBS release the unedited transcript of the interview to set the record straight.”

Trump’s attorneys filed the lawsuit in Texas, the brief states, because the interview was aired in Texas and because CBS “engaged in substantial and not isolated business activities in Texas.” They also cite other examples, including a 2004 CBS News 60 Minutes interview in which forged documents were allegedly presented “in an attempt to impugn President George W. Bush’s integrity regarding his service in the Texas Air National Guard.” It also cited other examples of “dishonest reporting.”

The lawsuit claims the damages to Trump are between $75,000 and up to at least $10 billion, saying “CBS’ distortion of the 60 Minutes interview damaged President Trump’s fundraising and support values by several billions of dollars, particularly in Texas.”

A CBS spokesperson issued a statement saying Trump’s claims were false.

“The Interview was not doctored; and 60 MINUTES did not hide any part of the Vice President’s answer to the question at issue. 60 MINUTES fairly presented the Interview to inform the viewing audience, and not to mislead it. The lawsuit Trump has brought today against CBS is completely without merit and we will vigorously defend against it,” the spokesperson said.

trump debates harris

Why a Vote for Trump Makes Sense [WRN VOICES]

Subject: Why Vote for Trump? I’ve got a service provider/ consultant friend of mine...
Milwaukee Police Association Endorsements

Milwaukee Police Association Endorsements Announced

The Milwaukee Police Association has announced its list of endorsed candidates for the November 5th...

BREAKING: RNC Sues Milwaukee for Shutting Out Poll Watchers

On Monday, the Republican National Committee sued the Milwaukee Elections Commission for the city's plan...
Gen Z's Interest in Skilled Trades

‘Inspiring and Eye-opening’: Gen Z’s Interest in Skilled Trades is Rising

Social media’s influence is causing Gen Z’s interest in skilled trades to rise, according to a report by Thumbtack – something a trade organization co-director said is “inspiring and eye-opening.”

“55% of Gen Zers are considering a skilled trade career (up 12% from last year) – including 72% of those with a college degree,” Thumbtack’s report stated.

Thumbtack is a company that helps people “care for and improve their homes” by finding a skilled tradesman nearby.

“84% of both Gen Zers and their parents express high respect for the skilled trades,” according to Thumbtack’s report.

The report shows that social media is a driving force behind Gen Z’s interest in trades, with “67% of Gen Zers – including 78% of those with a college degree – [saying] social media has increased their interest in these professions.”

“Skilled trades professionals are driving this trend, with 60% of pros saying that their careers are becoming increasingly ‘Instagrammable,’” the report stated, which feeds Gen Z’s desire to “[keep] it real” and “see both the good and bad parts of ‘a hard day’s work.’”

Ahead of social media, however, parents are the top influence as it concerns Gen Z’s career choice, according to the report.

Reasons Gen Z is attracted to the skilled trades are “the ability to earn money and work right away, to pursue a career they enjoy, and to learn new skills.”

These are “all attributes [skilled] pros rate as better than other industries,” the report stated. “Compared with an office job, the trades offer an opportunity to run your own company, control your own schedule, and pursue a career you enjoy.”

Unfortunately, “only 41% of [Gen Z] reported having any access to trade programs in school, effectively cutting off a pathway to well-paying skilled trades jobs for students every year.”

“When such programs are provided, however, Gen Z embraces them: 83% of Gen Zers who’ve taken shop class said it was their favorite subject,” according to the report.

Gen Z is “most interested in trade careers as engineers, electricians, carpenters, welders, general contractors, and plumbers,” which is “good news for both Gen Z and our communities,” the report stated.

“Gen Z college graduates are seven times more likely to regret attending college than pros who attended trade school,” according to the report. “And 83% of pros would still choose a skilled trades career if they could turn back the clock and decide again.

“80 percent of parents agree learning a skilled trade can be a better pathway to economic security than going to college,” Thumbtack said in another release. “Yet 77 percent of parents still say they’ve encouraged their children to attend a four-year college.”

Mark Hedstrom, co-executive director of Skilled Careers Coalition, told The Center Square that “there was a time when a college degree provided automatic entry into a lifelong, fulfilling career.”

“Today many young people graduating from college find themselves saddled with loan debt and unable to find a job in their field of choice,” Hedstrom said. “Skilled careers provide young people with an alternate path to success.”

Skilled Careers Coalition “looks to inspire the next generation of talent to pursue a skilled career and streamline the talent ecosystem to close the skills gap,” according to its website.

“Demand for talented professionals across a vast array of skilled trades and industries is higher than it’s ever been,” Hedstrom said.

“For young people to see others like them on social media working with their hands, earning a great living, and literally getting the job done, is both inspiring and eye-opening,” Hedstrom said. “Colleges and universities and the military are great career options for some, but for millions of high schoolers and those in the Gen Z set, these options either lack appeal, or just don’t work.”

Hedstrom also told The Center Square that although in its own study it found that guidance counselors, parents, and friends are the top career influencers for students, Skilled Careers Coalition is jumping onto the social media bandwagon with its Skills Jam entertainment brand.

“With the goal to inspire the next generation of master builders, welders, plumbers, creators and fixers, Skills Jam is a story- and information-sharing social media platform about the skilled trades for youth by youth,” Hedstrom said.

Thumbtack surveyed 1,000 Gen Zers, 1,000 Gen Z parents, and 1,233 Thumbtack Pros – those in a skilled trade –in July and August of 2024 for its study.

UW Reforms

The Taxpayer Funded Dorm Racket at UW

This is an opinion piece. Let’s first start with the UW’s desire to build more dorms...
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Why I’m Expecting a Trump Win on Tuesday

This is an opinion column. So Komrade Harris takes off a couple days to recover -...
unrealized gains

City of Madison & Madison School Referendums Would Add Massive Tax Burden

This is an opinion piece. These city of Madison and Madison School Districts referendums are going...
dane county ice holds

LIE EXPOSED: Dane County Sheriff Refused 90% of ICE Hold Requests in 2024 [EXCLUSIVE]

Dane County Sheriff Kalvin Barrett's office refused 90% of ICE requests to keep accused deportable...
Illegal Immigrants Crossed

2.5 Million From 4 Central America Countries Illegally Entered US Since 2021

Under the Biden-Harris administration, more than 2.5 million illegal border crossers were reported from Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.

The total excludes gotaways, those who illegally entered the U.S. and evaded capture. It also excludes the number of inadmissibles from these countries who were released into the U.S. through a so-called family reunification program (FRP) program created by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

Mayorkas created at least 13 parole programs identified as illegal by U.S. House Republicans who impeached him for them and other policies they argue created the border crisis. Among them was the CHNV parole program created for inadmissible citizens of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. Combined with illegal border crossers, they total more than 3 million under the Biden-Harris administration, The Center Square exclusively reported.

In July 2023, Mayorkas implemented the FRP program for inadmissible citizens of Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, The Center Square reported. Citizens of CHNV and FRP countries have been, and continue to be, linked to violent crimes committed against Americans and against others in the country illegally, The Center Square reported.

The FRP facilitated “access to lawful pathways” for citizens of these four countries, including the federal government opening regional processing centers for the first time in U.S. history outside of the United States. The first centers were opened in Colombia and Guatemala for their citizens to make appointments to meet with U.S. immigration specialists to help process them for entry before they arrived to the U.S.

“The new processes are for nationals from Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras whose family members are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents and who have received approval to join their family in the United States,” DHS said. “Specifically, nationals of these countries can be considered for parole on a case-by-case basis for a period of up to three years while they wait to apply to become a lawful permanent resident.”

Unlike CHNV data, DHS hasn’t publicized how many FRP recipients were released into the U.S. or how many were processed in Colombia and Guatemala before they arrived.

“These new processes promote family unity and provide lawful pathways consistent with our laws and our values,” Mayorkas said when announcing the FRP. “The Department has proven that the expansion of safe, orderly, and lawful pathways, combined with strong enforcement, is effective in reducing dangerous, irregular migration to the United States.”

Despite this, the greatest number of illegal border crossers were reported from these four FRP countries, according to CBP data from fiscal 2021 through fiscal 2024.

CBP’s fiscal year goes from Oct. 1 through Sept. 30. The data excludes the first three months of fiscal 2021, which occurred in 2020 under the Trump administration. Data from Trump-era months are miniscule compared to Biden-Harris-era months.

Colombia

Under the Biden-Harris administration, 442,299 Colombian illegal border crossers were reported, with the greatest number in fiscal 2023 of 167,388.

By comparison, 371 Colombian illegal border crossers were reported in December 2020 under the Trump administration and 19,287 in December 2023 under the Biden-Harris administration, according to the data.

El Salvador

Under the Biden-Harris administration, 306,455 Salvadoran illegal border crossers were reported, with the greatest number in fiscal 2022 of 97,797.

By comparison, 3,107 Salvadoran illegal border crossers were reported in October 2020 under the Trump administration and 9,848 in October 2021 under the Biden-Harris administration, according to the data.

Guatemala

Under the Biden-Harris administration, 913,783 Guatemalan illegal border crossers were reported, with the greatest number in nine months of fiscal 2021 of 251,902.

By comparison, 12,559 Guatemalan illegal border crossers were reported in December 2020 under the Trump administration and 35,544 in December 2023 under the Biden-Harris administration, according to the data.

Honduras

Under the Biden-Harris administration, 870,146 Honduran illegal border crossers were reported, with the greatest number in nine months of fiscal 2021 of 294,770.

By comparison, 7,535 Honduran illegal border crossers were reported in October 2020 under the Trump administration and 22,300 in October 2023 under the Biden-Harris administration, according to the data.

Combined, they total 2,532,683, excluding gotaways and those released through the FRP and other programs.

These numbers alone total more than the individual populations of 15 U.S. states.

Illegal Border Crossings Buses Carrying Migrants Northern Border Illegal Border Crossers Immigration Parole Illegal Immigrant Convicts Biden’s Immigration Policies

South Carolina Sheriff Under Fire For Refusing to Cooperate With ICE

A South Carolina sheriff is under fire for refusing to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

U.S. House representatives who chair the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability subcommittees are demanding answers from a Charleston County, South Carolina, sheriff in response to its noncompliance with ICE detainer requests.

U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-SC, and U.S. Rep. Glenn Grothman, R-Wis., sent a letter to Sheriff Kristin Graziano about her refusal to cooperate with ICE. They also announced they are investigating instances of local law enforcement agencies nationwide that refuse to cooperate with ICE.

They’re referring to a federal immigration law 287(g) program that authorizes ICE to designate some state and local law enforcement officers with specific immigration officer functions under its oversight. ICE explains the 287(g) program “enhances the safety and security of our nation’s communities” by allowing ICE officers “to partner with state and local law enforcement agencies to identify and remove incarcerated criminal noncitizens who are amenable to removal from the U.S. before they are released into the community.”

ICE also maintains that arresting and removing noncitizens “who undermine the safety of our nation’s communities and the integrity of U.S. immigration laws” is paramount.

Graziano, who was elected sheriff in November 2020, canceled the county’s cooperative agreement with ICE on Jan. 5, 2021, after she was sworn into office. Similarly, Harris County, Texas, Sheriff Ed Gonzalez did the same after he was elected in 2016, ending Texas’ largest county’s participation in the program in January 2017.

Local jurisdictions ending cooperative agreements with ICE because of so-called sanctuary city policies have been detrimental to arresting, detaining and removing some of the most violent offenders, ICE argues. Under the Biden-Harris administration, ICE Deputy Director Patrick Lechleitner said sanctuary policies are hurting Americans and noncitizens.

Some local jurisdictions “have reduced their cooperation with ICE, to include refusal to honor ICE detainer requests, even for noncitizens who have been convicted of serious felonies and pose an ongoing threat to public safety,” he said in a letter to Congress, due to their so-called “sanctuary city” policies. “However, ‘sanctuary’ policies can end up shielding dangerous criminals who often victimize those same communities,” he said.

In addition to ending the sheriff’s office 287(g) agreement with ICE, Graziano’s office also refused to honor at least 51 ICE detainer requests, according to ICE data.

Among the requests was one reportedly for “an illegal alien who was arrested and charged with two counts of criminal solicitation of a minor and then released back into the community,” Mace and Grothman said. “Due to your actions, ICE has designated Charleston County a ‘non-cooperative’ institution for refusing to detain criminal aliens long enough for ICE to take custody of them.”

Because local jurisdictions nationwide have refused to cooperate with ICE, the agency lifted detainers for 24,796 known criminals and released them into the U.S., Lechleitner said in a recently released report. The data is from Oct. 1, 2020, through July 22, 2024. Local jurisdictions refused to comply with 23,591 detainer requests, he said.

As of July 21, 2024, “there were 662,566 noncitizens with criminal histories on ICE’s national docket, which includes those detained by ICE, and on the agency’s non-detained docket. Of those, 435,719 are convicted criminals, and 226,847 have pending criminal charges,” Lechleitner said. This includes criminal foreign nationals convicted of, or charged with, homicide (14,914), sexual assault (20,061), assault (105,146), kidnapping (3,372), and commercialized sexual offenses, including sex trafficking (3,971).

The U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability has launched an investigation into why local jurisdictions refuse to cooperate with ICE, arguing doing so “endangers local residents.”

The committee requested Graziano provide requested information about her office and ICE requests by Nov. 10. If she fails to comply, she will be subpoenaed.

During Graziano’s tenure, 17 inmates have died, prompting a federal investigation “into a potential pattern of abuse at the county jail,” The Post and Courier reported. More than twice as many deaths occurred under her tenure than in the four years prior, according to the county coroner’s office.

Graziano, who’s running for reelection, called Mace a "liar" in a statement issued to the media with “a dump of paperwork” about how the jail functions, The Post and Courier reported. "Just because she and her congressional colleagues cannot solve our country's federal immigration problem doesn't mean they get to make it mine,” Graziano said. She also accused Congress of failing “to do its job” and “lawmakers like [Mace] think it's their job to force someone else to do their work. Not on my watch."

In response, Mace said, “The delusion is outstanding. The document 'dump' Graziano took the liberty of providing the press before our office CONFIRMS everything we've been saying about her reckless, fake, & self-imposed policies. This is not ‘abuse of authority,’ but necessary intervention.”

Mace has led the charge to deport criminal noncitizens, introducing a bill that passed in the House to do so. Among the 158 House Democrats who voted against it was South Carolina’s Jim Clyburn, The Center Square reported.