Tuesday, March 4, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Tuesday, March 4, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Franklin Mayor Wants to Reopen Rock’s Development Agreement, ‘Can’t Recall’ Insults at Meeting

spot_img

Franklin Mayor John Nelson said he wants the development agreement between the embattled Rock complex and the City of Franklin to be reopened and pledged an “aggressive” timeline to solve neighbors’ sound concerns in a fiery interview in which he said he could not recall, and then denied, that neighbors and county supervisors were insulted at an emergency meeting he convened.

Wisconsin Right Now has confirmed through multiple sources that neighbors and Milwaukee County supervisors were bashed repeatedly at the meeting, with insults flying around like “idiots,” “f*ckers,” “crazy” and “terrorists.”

“I will get this done,” Nelson pledged of the neighbors’ noise concerns. He believes if the Rock turns its speakers in and angles them down, it will “Quell 90 percent of what’s going on.” Nelson said he wants to “open” the development agreement between the city and Rock and “make adjustments.”

“The paradigm has shifted,” Nelson said to WRN. “I will come up with an aggressive timeline. I want to get this whole sound monitor stuff done right away.” He’s referring to a County sound study’s revelation that some of the Rock’s sound monitors don’t work. Nelson wants the city to take over running them and to put the data online.

“It is too loud,” he acknowledged of the noise emanating from the sports and entertainment complex into nearby residential neighborhoods. “We don’t like it from the city’s standpoint.”

During the first portion of the Monday interview, an angry Nelson interrogated the Wisconsin Right Now reporter, attempting to learn WRN’s sources and repeatedly demanding to know whether the meeting was recorded or “bugged.”

WRN does not reveal its sources one way or the other. We had reported that the five-person emergency meeting Nelson convened last week about the Rock ended up in a bash fest against neighbors and county supervisors who have said noise concerns are so persistent they are wrecking their lives.

Asked whether he condemns Milwaukee County Supervisor Steve Taylor calling county supervisors “terrorists” and neighbors “idiots” at the meeting, Nelson stated, “I don’t recall him saying anything like that number one.” Nelson also insisted at one point, “Nobody attacked anybody in this meeting.” He noted, “I don’t recall anyone calling Patti Logsdon any names.”

However, that is flatly not true. During the meeting, Taylor called supervisors “terrorists” and neighbors “idiots,” and he also referred to neighbors as “f*ckers.” Developer Mike Zimmerman called Milwaukee County Supervisor Patti Logsdon “crazy.” A Franklin critic was labeled a “grinch” and “super creep,” and Logsdon was called a “desperate woman.”

Nelson then stated, “I can’t speak to what Steve Taylor did or didn’t say.” At another point, though, Nelson disputed that Taylor or anyone was “saying the F-bomb on these people. I don’t believe it was said.” However, WRN has confirmed that Taylor did in fact call the neighbors “f*ckers” during the meeting.

We also wrote Taylor and asked him whether he regretted making the remarks and whether he planned to apologize, but he did not respond.

We asked Nelson about comments HE made at the meeting, referring to a female neighbor as emotional and commenting on her eyes and hair, and he admitted making those comments. He said those comments were a reference to when he went to the neighborhood near the Rock while the recent Taco and Tequila event was going on at the establishment, and the neighbor “had an angry, fiery look in her eyes. She always has.” He stated that she is “very, very emotional about the sound, and that’s it.”

According to Nelson, “We’re having that meeting to come up with solutions with an aggressive timeline” to get the neighbors’ and city’s concerns addressed. “We all agreed to come to the table with short and long-term goals.”

We asked why Milwaukee County Supervisor Steve Taylor was included in the meeting but Logsdon, who represents the area, was not. Taylor now works for the Rock’s foundation, and he spoke on behalf of the Rock at the five-person meeting. In addition to Nelson and Taylor, the other invitees were developer Mike Zimmerman, Franklin Alderman Jason Craig, and Franklin Administrator Kelly Hersh. The neighbors and other county supervisors were not included.

Nelson acknowledged that his campaign was supported by Zimmerman. He said he received the maximum donation, which is $735 a person. He claimed others from the Rock development supported his opponent. He also said he held a campaign event at the Rock’s golf facility. He said concerns about those things are unfair.

Nelson said that Logsdon “was not invited because she already has been leading the charge to sue The Rock. She already has her mind made up.”

Asked how that differed from Taylor and Zimmerman, who are fervently pro-Rock, and who were at the emergency meeting, he stated,  “This is the first meeting of many.” He said that Logsdon would be involved in future meetings. Logsdon is one of at least three supervisors who have raised the possibility of taking legal action against The Rock or trying to reopen its development agreement; the others are Kathleen Vincent and Deanna Alexander.

Asked for his reaction to Logsdon being called “crazy” at the meeting, Nelson said, “not by me,” adding that he was “not going into others.”

WRN asked why he didn’t defend the neighbors and supervisors or push back when they were insulted by others at the meeting. He stressed that he has “defended the neighbors many times” and has “gone there numerous times when citizens have called.”

Nelson claimed The Rock is operating under the 79-decibel level set in the city development agreement and thus doesn’t ever hit the violation level. The neighbors dispute this contention, which we will be exploring in depth in an upcoming article.

He said the Rock should turn the speakers in and the music down. He acknowledged there have been “issues with the sound monitors.”

According to Nelson, the issues have stemmed from what he sees as a flawed development agreement between the city and The Rock’s developers. “We’ve been beat up on it for many years,” he said. “We’ve gotten Mr. Zimmerman and The Rock group to come with solutions. It’s to that point.”

He stressed that at the first meeting, they all agreed to “bring a wish list of all we want to do.”

At one point, Nelson said of the WRN reporter, “See how much crap you can stir.”

However, he also said that, generally, he condemns any negative comments made by anyone towards the neighbors.

At another point, he said that Logsdon was not included because she “is suing The Rock,” although Logsdon has said she wants to explore whether to bring a resolution to have the county take legal action against The Rock.

“If she wants to be part of the solution, I welcome her to the table,” he said.

According to Nelson, possible solutions include “soundboards.” He also wants to see the Rock’s sound meters “taken over by the City of Franklin and put on the website.”

He said the city continues to only count a violation if one exists for 30 minutes straight, without an interruption, and admitted that would make it almost impossible for The Rock to get a violation.

He described the Taco and Tequila event as “extremely heavily attended” with no arrests and no citations. He admitted some problems with the event but said, “They want more concerts.”

Nelson recalled when the site of The Rock was a “dark black hill” where he would sled as a child. He said no one thought the area would be what it is today and noted it is good for Franklin’s economic base.

He acknowledged the “announcer’s voice is very loud” at Milkmen games. He said The Rock could be a “concert venue” at some point.

According to Nelson, The Rock has “done things as well that have addressed some of these issues, but is it enough?”

He said the development agreement trumps city ordinances.

Nelson wants to make the monitors operable and bring in a neighborhood representative. “There is no one in cahoots here,” said Nelson.

“What we’re doing is trying to stop the contentious relationship,” and “heal” and “move forward,” said Nelson.

Asked how the name-calling at the emergency meeting helped with that quest, as well as some of the comments on social media over the years by Taylor and Zimmerman, Nelson said, “I condemn anyone being disrespectful to our residents and neighborhoods.”

“They were there first,” he said of the neighbors.

He disputed that their property values are down.

Asked about Hersh’s comments at the meeting that she wanted to get data to support people calling the neighbors “Karens,” which is a derogatory term, Nelson said, “I am not sure what that is and what that would mean. Any data discussion would be trying to prove the decibel amount. We are trying to define a baseline for these decibels.”

Hersh did not return a request for comment.

He said he would like to see different decibel levels, perhaps in the 50s or 60s for a ball game, and maybe in the low 70s for a concert night three or four times a year. He also wants the events to end at certain times. He wants a designated sound system for the Umbrella Bar.

Nelson claimed the “former mayor had a terrible relationship with The Rock,” adding that the “city is heavily invested in this project.”

“It’s taking longer than we thought,” said Nelson, referring to resolution to noise concerns. He said part of the delay was because “Rock management and ownership were waiting” for the county’s $200,000 sound study to come out.

He did not specify the exact timeline but noted that the Milkmen games are done for the year.

He did say he liked Greendale’s sound ordinance which breaks down different decibel levels by sound type, time, and zoning.

Nelson said he stood by his own comments at the meeting and would “not comment on anything they may or may not have said,” referring to Zimmerman and Taylor.

Asked why he and others at the meeting were trying to designate a neighborhood leader and why he did not want the neighbor he called “too emotional” to lead the neighbors, he said, “The concern with Dana is she would go back with boxes of data and go back into the past.” He said he wants to move forward to the future.

“I want people to know this is going to be a very transparent and inclusive way of coming to solutions,” Nelson insisted. “We are going to move forward with a very direct timeline. It’s going to have accountability.”

Langdon Street Attacker

Susan Crawford Wished to ‘Fix’ Violent Langdon Street Attacker Who Brutally Beat Female UW-Madison Student

"I wish I could do something to fix Mr. Winslow's trauma that he's experienced," Judge...

Rep. Piwowarczyk: ROFR Violates Conservative Values, Stifles Free Market Competition

A newly proposed bill would grant at least two Wisconsin-based companies—the American Transmission Company (ATC)...
susan crawford

Susan Crawford Tried to Make Wisconsin Taxpayers Pay Spanish Train Company $66 Million

"The taxpayers for the state are paying the bill and not getting anything for it"...
Illegal Border Crossings Buses Carrying Migrants Northern Border Illegal Border Crossers Immigration Parole Illegal Immigrant Convicts Biden’s Immigration Policies

National Sheriffs Association Says About 700,000 ICE Arrest Warrants Nationwide

State and local law enforcement are being put in harm's way with Illinois’ migrant sanctuary policies, the Illinois Sheriffs Association says.

Association Executive Director Jim Kaitschuk said the National Sheriffs Association put out a note to their state partners that there are 700,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement administrative arrest warrants that are active. But, that doesn’t matter in Illinois.

“Illinois law enforcement is precluded and prohibited from participating in any activity that is solely related to civil enforcement,” Kaitschuk told The Center Square.

Illinois law, through the TRUST Act and The Way Forward Act, prohibits state and local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration officials if a civil detention order is the only thing ICE has against someone.

While Kaitschuk said they can cooperate when there are criminal orders, law enforcement not being able to cooperate with civil warrants can still cause security concerns.

“Unfortunately things do go wrong, right, and then we’re in a situation where you may not know anything about what’s occurring,” Kaitschuk said. “So, we’re kind of blind in those cases.”

Daily immigration arrests nationwide haven’t been comprehensively published, but some estimates are more than 21,000 immigration detentions across the country since Jan. 20, when President Donald Trump took office.

Last week, state Sen. Omar Aquino, D-Chicago, told a group of immigration advocates that Illinois will stand strong.

“You are not going to come into our house and just try to take people and separate families in this state,” Aquino said. “People have rights. They are human rights.”

Illinois law also limits ICE from using local county detention facilities. Kaitschuk said the state’s sanctuary policies prohibit police from even knowing whether they have a suspected illegal immigrant in their jail.

“And [ICE] they’re having to go to people’s houses and at the point in time, the problem then is that you may be subjecting people then that weren’t involved in any other criminal activity other than being here … not legally and open them up to being subjected to ICE at that point in time in that residence, as opposed to if they were at the jail, where they wouldn’t have been,” Kaitschuk said.

Illinois and Chicago officials are on the other side of the U.S. Department of Justice in litigation over migrant sanctuary policies. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is due in front of the U.S. House Oversight Committee Wednesday to discuss the city’s migrant sanctuary policies.

The 21 Foreign Nationals in the Milwaukee County Jail

There were at least 21 foreign nationals in the Milwaukee County Jail on a snapshot...
susan crawford

Wisconsin Child Rape Victim’s Haunting Statement to Judge Susan Crawford: ‘I Love Spaghetti & Mac N Cheese’

When it was Judge Susan Crawford's time to talk, she gave child rapist Curtis O'Brien...
Wisconsin's Rape Kit Strategy

EXCLUSIVE: Jill Karofsky Was an Architect of Wisconsin’s Rape Kit Strategy Before & During Brad Schimel’s AG Tenure

In multiple newspaper articles at the time, Jill Karofsky adamantly defended the Schimel DOJ's approach...
ryan withee

Ryan Withee, Missing: Where Is the Milwaukee Man?

“Yo, yo, I need help bro." That frantic-sounding message was written at 1:10 a.m. on April...
susan crawford

Brad Schimel Challenges Susan Crawford to Say ‘Men Are Men; Women Are Women’

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel is speaking out against Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' much-mocked...

Gov. Tony Evers Changes “Mother” to “Inseminated Person” in Budget Bill

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers introduced a budget bill this week that calls mothers an "inseminated...
josh kaul

‘Josh Kaul Called Me’: The Curious Timing of the AG’s ‘Fundraising’ Call

This is a column by Meg Ellefson, reprinted with permission from WSAU.com. This week, the unelected...

Susan Crawford’s ‘Mismanagement’ at DNR Led to ‘Terrible Time for Wisconsin Farmers’: Expert

As an official with the state DNR, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Susan Crawford orchestrated a...
brad schimel rape kits

Wisconsin DAs, Sheriffs Praise Brad Schimel For Fixing Rape Kit Backlog

Brad Schimel rape kit controversy: Top law enforcement officials say Susan Crawford is lying about...
susan crawford act 10

Act 10 Calculator: How Much More You’d Pay in Wisconsin Property Tax if It’s Overturned

"For an average Wisconsin home valued at $300,000, property taxes could increase by $624 or...
slinger trump sign

Slinger, Wisconsin Orders Elderly Couple to Take Down ‘God, Guns, Trump’ Sign

"We're battling to the end" - Cameron Merkel The Village of Slinger, Wisconsin, is ordering...
Daniel gonzales

How to Help Wounded Milwaukee Police Officer Daniel Gonzales

The Milwaukee Police Association has announced a donation fund to help wounded Milwaukee Police Officer...
brittany kinser

6 Things to Remember About Brittany Kinser’s Big Victory Tuesday

Moderate education reformer Brittany Kinser's big victory in a three-way primary on Tuesday night sets...
susan crawford

3 Killers of Dane Co. Man Will Soon All be Free Due to Judge Susan Crawford

They were involved in the brutal murder of a man who was beaten to death....
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Trump Gains More Ground in War Against DEI

A major shift is underway in the way large companies talk about and fund Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

President Donald Trump began the transition when he signed an executive order last month eliminating DEI policies and staff at the federal government and extending the anti-DEI policy to federal contractors.

Private companies, some of which had already begun the transition before Trump took office, remarkably began backing off their DEI policies, even if only symbolically with little internal change.

Costco resisted, pushing back on the Trump administration, but other major brands like Amazon Wal-Mart, Target, and Meta announced a pullback from DEI. Media reports indicated DEI discussions on earnings calls has plummeted.

Others, such as Wisconsin-based financial services company Fiserv, have not yet made a change, at least not publicly.

A murky legal future awaits companies willing to take the risk to stick with DEI policies, particularly in hiring.

Fiserv receives hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts.

According to Fiserv’s website’s Diversity & Inclusion page, the company is “committed to promoting diversity and inclusion (D&I) across all levels of the organization, in our communities and throughout our industry."

Fiserv says that it “partner[s] with people and organizations around the world to advance our D&I efforts and create opportunities for our employees, entrepreneurs around the world and the next generation of innovators.”

The company's diversity and inclusion page includes a careers section that discusses “engaging diverse talent” and events to connect with “diverse candidates.”

Critics of DEI initiatives and policies say they discriminate against white men and Asians and lead to hiring and promotion decisions based on factors such as race and sexual orientation rather than merit.

In its 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company boasted that "60% of director nominees for the 2024 annual meeting reflect gender or racial/ethnic diversity."

According to an April 2024 report from Payments Dive, Fiserv was “buoyed by sales to government entities” in Q1 of 2024 and reported $500 million in revenue from those contracts. The U.S. Coast Guard contracted with Fiserv in 2024 to help with payroll, according to HigherGov, among other government contracts.

Fiserv did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

A watershed moment against DEI came when during the Biden administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against longstanding affirmative action policies at American universities, one key example of white and Asian Americans being discriminated against.

Trump’s election has only solidified the new legal framework for what is permissible when considering race and gender in hiring, promotion, and workplace etiquette.

From Trump’s order:

In the private sector, many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism.

Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.

DEI has become increasingly controversial as activists use the moniker to advance every liberal policy on race and gender, often at taxpayer expense. In the federal government, DEI had become widespread and infiltrated into every part of governance, from racial quotas for promotions at the Pentagon to driving healthcare research at the National Institutes of Health.

At private companies, DEI policies guided investment decisions via ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) as well as personnel decisions with racial quotas for company board rooms. Those ideas are out of favor with the Trump administration.

Some of the companies resisting the shift from DEI could face legal action.

A coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to Costco alleging it is violating the law, as The Center Square previously reported.

“Although Costco’s motto is 'do the right thing,' it appears that the company is doing the wrong thing – clinging to DEI policies that courts and businesses have rejected as illegal,” the letter said.

This week, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against Starbucks for similar policies.

"By making employment decisions based on characteristics that have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well, Starbucks, for example, hires people by thumbing the scale based on at least one of Starbucks’ preferred immutable characteristics rather than an evaluation of an applicant’s merit and qualifications,” the lawsuit said. “Making hiring decision on non-merit considerations will skew the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri’s consumers."

A 2022 Starbucks document touts a DEI goal: “By 2025, our goal is to achieve BIPOC representation of at least 30% at all corporate levels and at least 40% at all retail and manufacturing roles.”

Bailey called the Starbucks policies discriminatory and illegal.

"With Starbucks’ discriminatory patterns, practices, and policies, Missouri’s consumers are required to pay higher prices and wait longer for goods and services that could be provided for less had Starbucks employed the most qualified workers, regardless of their race, color, sex, or national origin,” Bailey said. “As Attorney General, I have a moral and legal obligation to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks."

Vote Tuesday for Brittany Kinser If you Want Wisconsin Education Reform: Scott Frostman

The choice is clear. It’s not even close. It’s uncommon to have massive attention thrust...