Friday, February 28, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Friday, February 28, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

UW-Madison Fails Its Jewish Students in Wake of Hamas Terrorist Attack Against Israel 

spot_img

By Samantha (last name withheld)
UW-Madison student

Following the recent barbaric terrorist attacks perpetrated by Hamas on Israeli civilians, UW-Madison’s response has been dismal at best.

On October 7, Israelis and Jews across the world were horrified by what has been one of the deadliest attacks against Jews in modern times. Yet, the university seemed to hesitate when it came to extending its support to the nearly 5,000 Jewish students on its campus.

The university broke its silence on October 10, with an Instagram story stating, “To our students affected by recent acts of violence in Israel and the Palestinian Territories, we are here to support you.”

Israel had already declared war, and many students, including myself, were left scared about family and friends overseas and wondered if the university would offer a more substantive response.

The meager attempt was followed by a compelling Open letter to the Administration written by Chabad Rabbi, Mendel Matusof. In the letter, Rabbi Mendel articulated the shock and trauma the Jewish community on campus was experiencing as a result of the events in Israel and how UW had inadvertently exacerbated the situation.

He wrote, “Unfortunately, the UW has made it worse. By acknowledging the acts of terror under the guise of ‘violence in Israel and the Palestinian Territories’, the administration itself seems to lessen the abhorrence of the terrorism by giving it the guise of a political dispute.”

Rabbi Mendel ended the letter by saying he was hopeful the UW administration would understand what the Jewish community on campus was experiencing, and “provide the appropriate response and empathy.”

On October 11, Chancellor Mnookin did issue a more substantive statement, with a response still titled, “A message from Chancellor Mnookin on the tragic events in Israel and the Palestinian Territories.”

In one part of the chancellor’s statement she wrote, “As a general matter, I am skeptical that those in roles like mine should frequently comment on global or world events.”

This is perplexing given the university’s recent past.

In May 2021, the Office of Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) wrote a reflection on the anniversary of George Floyd’s Death.

In the spring of 2023, when a video of a UW student making a racist comment plagued the internet, both the Chancellor and the office of DEI offered multiple messages. On May 1, UW gave an initial response to the video which was then followed by messages from the Deputy Vice Chancellor for DEI, and Chancellor Mnookin’s direct response to the Blk Pwr Coalition.

On June 29, 2023, the Chancellor shared her thoughts on the Supreme Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard.

So why the hesitation now?

Just over a week ago, I walked back from class only to come across a protest in the center of campus, with students chanting and cheering on the slaughter of over 1,000 Jews with slogans such as “Glory to the martyrs” and “We will liberate the land by any means necessary.”

On October 17, the Students for Justice in Palestine group on campus held a “Free Gaza” event which prompted Hillel, a national Jewish organization on campus, to send an email stating, “We have been made aware of a ‘Free Palestine’ demonstration scheduled for this evening. In the interest of your safety and the well-being of our community, we, in consultation with our communal leaders and experts, encourage you to consider that the most effective response is to refrain from attending and engaging with the demonstration.”

This begs the question of why are outside organizations being left to bear the responsibility of asking the university to take action or to look out for the safety of Jewish students while the university sits idly by.

While I do not condone the chilling of free speech, the school’s inaction with ongoing protests that are glorifying the deaths of over 1,000 Jews, leaves me with two primary questions.

First, how sincere is the university’s commitment to “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion” when it cannot give Jewish students the same treatment it offers others?

And second, where is the university’s overall concern for the safety of Jewish students on campus?

We have withheld Samantha’s last name at her request because of the tensions on campus.

susan crawford

Susan Crawford Tried to Make Wisconsin Taxpayers Pay Spanish Train Company $66 Million

"The taxpayers for the state are paying the bill and not getting anything for it"...
susan crawford

Wisconsin Child Rape Victim’s Haunting Statement to Judge Susan Crawford: ‘I Love Spaghetti & Mac N Cheese’

When it was Judge Susan Crawford's time to talk, she gave child rapist Curtis O'Brien...
Wisconsin's Rape Kit Strategy

EXCLUSIVE: Jill Karofsky Was an Architect of Wisconsin’s Rape Kit Strategy Before & During Brad Schimel’s AG Tenure

In multiple newspaper articles at the time, Jill Karofsky adamantly defended the Schimel DOJ's approach...
ryan withee

Ryan Withee, Missing: Where Is the Milwaukee Man?

“Yo, yo, I need help bro." That frantic-sounding message was written at 1:10 a.m. on April...
susan crawford

Brad Schimel Challenges Susan Crawford to Say ‘Men Are Men; Women Are Women’

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel is speaking out against Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' much-mocked...

Gov. Tony Evers Changes “Mother” to “Inseminated Person” in Budget Bill

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers introduced a budget bill this week that calls mothers an "inseminated...
josh kaul

‘Josh Kaul Called Me’: The Curious Timing of the AG’s ‘Fundraising’ Call

This is a column by Meg Ellefson, reprinted with permission from WSAU.com. This week, the unelected...

Susan Crawford’s ‘Mismanagement’ at DNR Led to ‘Terrible Time for Wisconsin Farmers’: Expert

As an official with the state DNR, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Susan Crawford orchestrated a...
brad schimel rape kits

Wisconsin DAs, Sheriffs Praise Brad Schimel For Fixing Rape Kit Backlog

Brad Schimel rape kit controversy: Top law enforcement officials say Susan Crawford is lying about...
susan crawford act 10

Act 10 Calculator: How Much More You’d Pay in Wisconsin Property Tax if It’s Overturned

"For an average Wisconsin home valued at $300,000, property taxes could increase by $624 or...
slinger trump sign

Slinger, Wisconsin Orders Elderly Couple to Take Down ‘God, Guns, Trump’ Sign

"We're battling to the end" - Cameron Merkel The Village of Slinger, Wisconsin, is ordering...
Daniel gonzales

How to Help Wounded Milwaukee Police Officer Daniel Gonzales

The Milwaukee Police Association has announced a donation fund to help wounded Milwaukee Police Officer...
brittany kinser

6 Things to Remember About Brittany Kinser’s Big Victory Tuesday

Moderate education reformer Brittany Kinser's big victory in a three-way primary on Tuesday night sets...
susan crawford

3 Killers of Dane Co. Man Will Soon All be Free Due to Judge Susan Crawford

They were involved in the brutal murder of a man who was beaten to death....
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Trump Gains More Ground in War Against DEI

A major shift is underway in the way large companies talk about and fund Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

President Donald Trump began the transition when he signed an executive order last month eliminating DEI policies and staff at the federal government and extending the anti-DEI policy to federal contractors.

Private companies, some of which had already begun the transition before Trump took office, remarkably began backing off their DEI policies, even if only symbolically with little internal change.

Costco resisted, pushing back on the Trump administration, but other major brands like Amazon Wal-Mart, Target, and Meta announced a pullback from DEI. Media reports indicated DEI discussions on earnings calls has plummeted.

Others, such as Wisconsin-based financial services company Fiserv, have not yet made a change, at least not publicly.

A murky legal future awaits companies willing to take the risk to stick with DEI policies, particularly in hiring.

Fiserv receives hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts.

According to Fiserv’s website’s Diversity & Inclusion page, the company is “committed to promoting diversity and inclusion (D&I) across all levels of the organization, in our communities and throughout our industry."

Fiserv says that it “partner[s] with people and organizations around the world to advance our D&I efforts and create opportunities for our employees, entrepreneurs around the world and the next generation of innovators.”

The company's diversity and inclusion page includes a careers section that discusses “engaging diverse talent” and events to connect with “diverse candidates.”

Critics of DEI initiatives and policies say they discriminate against white men and Asians and lead to hiring and promotion decisions based on factors such as race and sexual orientation rather than merit.

In its 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company boasted that "60% of director nominees for the 2024 annual meeting reflect gender or racial/ethnic diversity."

According to an April 2024 report from Payments Dive, Fiserv was “buoyed by sales to government entities” in Q1 of 2024 and reported $500 million in revenue from those contracts. The U.S. Coast Guard contracted with Fiserv in 2024 to help with payroll, according to HigherGov, among other government contracts.

Fiserv did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

A watershed moment against DEI came when during the Biden administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against longstanding affirmative action policies at American universities, one key example of white and Asian Americans being discriminated against.

Trump’s election has only solidified the new legal framework for what is permissible when considering race and gender in hiring, promotion, and workplace etiquette.

From Trump’s order:

In the private sector, many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism.

Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.

DEI has become increasingly controversial as activists use the moniker to advance every liberal policy on race and gender, often at taxpayer expense. In the federal government, DEI had become widespread and infiltrated into every part of governance, from racial quotas for promotions at the Pentagon to driving healthcare research at the National Institutes of Health.

At private companies, DEI policies guided investment decisions via ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) as well as personnel decisions with racial quotas for company board rooms. Those ideas are out of favor with the Trump administration.

Some of the companies resisting the shift from DEI could face legal action.

A coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to Costco alleging it is violating the law, as The Center Square previously reported.

“Although Costco’s motto is 'do the right thing,' it appears that the company is doing the wrong thing – clinging to DEI policies that courts and businesses have rejected as illegal,” the letter said.

This week, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against Starbucks for similar policies.

"By making employment decisions based on characteristics that have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well, Starbucks, for example, hires people by thumbing the scale based on at least one of Starbucks’ preferred immutable characteristics rather than an evaluation of an applicant’s merit and qualifications,” the lawsuit said. “Making hiring decision on non-merit considerations will skew the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri’s consumers."

A 2022 Starbucks document touts a DEI goal: “By 2025, our goal is to achieve BIPOC representation of at least 30% at all corporate levels and at least 40% at all retail and manufacturing roles.”

Bailey called the Starbucks policies discriminatory and illegal.

"With Starbucks’ discriminatory patterns, practices, and policies, Missouri’s consumers are required to pay higher prices and wait longer for goods and services that could be provided for less had Starbucks employed the most qualified workers, regardless of their race, color, sex, or national origin,” Bailey said. “As Attorney General, I have a moral and legal obligation to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks."

Vote Tuesday for Brittany Kinser If you Want Wisconsin Education Reform: Scott Frostman

The choice is clear. It’s not even close. It’s uncommon to have massive attention thrust...
U.S.-Canada Border

White House Touts Border Progress

The White House over the weekend touted its progress on the southern border as President Donald Trump completed his fourth week back in office.

"Encounters of illegal immigrants at our southern border are plummeting and migrants are starting to realize it’s fruitless to attempt to illegally cross our border," the White House said Saturday in a statement.

Upon taking office, Trump issued a series of executive orders ending Biden administration policies that allowed asylum seekers to flood into America. On his second day in office, the president sent 1,500 active-duty service members and additional air and intelligence assets.

Border crossing attempts are down more than 90% from the same time last year, according to data first obtained by the New York Post.

“Border numbers are down over 90% in three weeks,” Tom Homan, the pick by Trump called border czar, said during an interview on Fox News. “When you got 90% less people coming across the border, how many women aren’t being raped by the cartels? How many children aren’t drowning? How many women and children aren’t being sex trafficked in this country? President Trump is a gamechanger.”

Multiple media reports indicate many people headed from other countries to the United States have since changed their mind and headed back home.

The White House pointed out a Wednesday story from The Washington Times showing officials in Costa Rica and Panama are meeting to discuss how to handle the large number of people who had been waiting in Mexico to enter the United States but have since given up and are returning to South America.

The administration also linked a Thursday story from Telemundo saying "migrants from Honduras, El Salvador, Columbia and Venezuela are heading back home" instead of continuing to America. And the White House linked a Thursday story from El Cronista saying the Mexican government provided a $9.3 million contract for 140 shelters to help with people "returning to Mexico."

Policies during the Biden administration allowed 12 million people to enter the country, most given dates to appear with immigration officials much later. The volume pushed many of those appointments beyond a year and even 18 months. A surge in fentanyl accompanied the timing.

Trump, the second term Republican, has reversed the trend. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and specifically ICE Enforcement and Removal regional offices, across the country have helped move many people illegally in the country back to their native homelands.

Trump also threatened tariffs against Mexico if it did not help fix the problem. To temporarily avert the tariffs, Mexico’s president agreed to deploy thousands more troops to the southern border.

In another reversal, the Biden administration worked – including litigation – to block Texas from installing border security measures like barbed wire and buoys in the river to keep people from swimming across.

In a social media post Sunday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott wrote, “Texas installed more buoys into the Rio Grande the SAME day President Trump returned to office. The Biden administration tried – and FAILED – to keep Texas from using this effective border security tactic.

“Now, we have a President who is partnering with Texas to deny illegal entry.”

elon musk trump twitter

Musk Has No Time to Lose! [Up Against the Wall]

I love Elon’s sense of urgency. It’s no wonder he gets stuff done when others...

Book Excerpt: The Hollowing Out of Wisconsin Farmland

The following excerpt is from Wisconsin author Brian Reisinger’s “Land Rich, Cash Poor: My Family’s Hope...
lake mills

‘Bikers Against Predators’ Upset Lake Mills Police Didn’t Immediately Arrest Man in Sting

Update: Jail records show the man has now been booked into the Jefferson Co. Jail...