Friday, February 28, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Friday, February 28, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Doctor Says Brother Told Him in 1997 That Janet Protasiewicz ‘Slapped Around’ Her Husband

spot_img

Dr. Mark Madden, the second former stepson of Supreme Court candidate Janet Protasiewicz to come forward, told Wisconsin Right Now on Sunday night that he remembers his brother, Michael, telling him in 1997 that Protasiewicz allegedly “slapped him (her husband) around a bit,” referring to their father, retired Judge Patrick J. Madden.

Asked whether it’s true that she physically abused her ex-husband, Protasiewicz has not responded to Wisconsin Right Now’s request for comment. She has not denied the accusations despite being given days to do so.

Wisconsin Right Now previously reported that two alleged eyewitnesses – Protasiewicz’s former stepson Michael Madden and a long-time Madden family friend, Jon Ehr – allege that they personally witnessed Protasiewicz physically abuse Judge Madden. Both also say that they saw injuries on Judge Madden’s face, and Ehr alleged that Judge Madden said they were caused by Protasiewicz. Both Michael Madden and Ehr, who is a former restaurant/bar owner in Milwaukee who is not related to the Madden family, also allege that they heard Protasiewicz use a racial slur to refer to blacks.

Protasiewicz, then a 34-year-old assistant district attorney assigned to Children’s Court, was married to Madden, then a 70-year-old reserve judge, for less than a year in 1997 before the marriage disintegrated into an ugly divorce battle that centered, in part, over her alleged unhappiness with the fact Michael, then also in his 30s, was living in the home, court records show. Protasiewicz has since remarried, and Judge Madden is deceased.

Dr. Mark Madden, who is a retired orthopedic surgeon from Virginia with no criminal history, previously told Wisconsin Right Now that he did not know about the alleged abuse, but he told us Sunday that he meant then only that he did not actually see the alleged abuse himself, because he did not live in the house or state. In contrast, he said, Michael Madden lived in the home with the couple, and court records confirm that.

However, Dr. Madden told us Sunday that he heard about the abuse at the time because Michael Madden called him during the 1997 marriage between Protasiewicz, 34, and Judge Madden, 70, and told him about the alleged abuse at that time.

He also said that Michael alleged that Protasiewicz was “drunk again and pushing dad around.” He said Michael made it clear that he was alleging that Protasiewicz was pushing Judge Madden around physically.

Dr. Madden is now the third person to tell Wisconsin Right Now that they heard of the alleged abuse years ago. The other two people spoke to Wisconsin Right Now on the condition of anonymity; one is a woman named Rita who is in her 80s and lived in a Florida condo complex where Judge Madden stayed, and the other is a long-time family friend of the Madden family. We know both of their names, but neither of them wanted to have those names printed due to the contentiousness of the state Supreme Court race.

Protasiewicz is running as a liberal in the race against former Justice Dan Kelly.

That means Wisconsin Right Now has now spoken to THREE people who say that they knew about the alleged abuse, although not firsthand, years ago – Dr. Madden, Rita, and the family friend. The importance of these accounts is to show that Michael has allegedly been making the allegations for years, not simply because Protasiewicz is running for Supreme Court.

Corroborative witnesses who were told about alleged abuse at the time it occurred or shortly thereafter were widely used by prominent news organizations to justify running stories during the height of the “Me Too” movement, even in cases where, as is here, police were never called. This is a common verification technique used by the news media, although, in the case of Protasiewicz, so far, the Wisconsin news media have censored the accusations against her, refusing to tell the public that they exist and refusing to tell voters whether Protasiewicz will even answer the question.

According to the Women’s Media Center, which offers suggestions on reporting on “sexualized violence,” “If a woman says a man sexually assaulted or harassed her, ask her if she told others after it happened and, if so, whether you can speak to them. But do recognize that there is rarely a case in which a survivor stands to benefit from coming forward about an attack. They face recriminations, public airing of a painful matter, and ridicule from parts of society that blame the victim.” Presumably, those suggestions can also be applied to accusations of physical violence against a man.

The Center also suggests, “Speaking of allegations and belief, don’t dismiss an accusation just because you can’t find easy corroborating evidence. Seek out others who may have also been affected — whether as witnesses or victims themselves.”

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel sought out such allegedly corroborating people (although there were no other eyewitnesses) to justify printing accusations of sexual assault against Protasiewicz’s former primary opponent, Judge Everett Mitchell, accusations that came up in a contentious divorce, that he denied and into which there was no police investigation.

When it comes to Protasiewicz, there is a media wall of silence.

The news media have also censored the accusations of racial slurs against Protasiewicz, even though Protasiewicz won’t respond to questions about that, either, and even though the Milwaukee NAACP’s president said he wants to see a response from DA John Chisholm into whether Chisholm will review Protasiewicz’s old cases from that time frame for racial bias.

Mark Madden said he believes that his dad wanted a divorce from Protasiewicz because he “couldn’t take it anymore.” Court records show Protasiewicz sought an annulment, but the judge granted Judge Madden’s request for a divorce.

“Alcohol was free-flowing in the house for both of them,” alleges Dr. Mark Madden.

The divorce papers don’t mention alleged abuse. “Dad was very private, very poetic,” Dr. Madden said of the former judge, who served on the Milwaukee County bench for 24 years.

Of Michael, Dr. Madden added, “My brother was living in the house. He’s an eyewitness. He doesn’t lie. I believe him.”

By the time he figured out the “gravity of the situation,” Dr. Madden said Protasiewicz and his father were already headed toward divorce.

 

susan crawford

Susan Crawford Tried to Make Wisconsin Taxpayers Pay Spanish Train Company $66 Million

"The taxpayers for the state are paying the bill and not getting anything for it"...
susan crawford

Wisconsin Child Rape Victim’s Haunting Statement to Judge Susan Crawford: ‘I Love Spaghetti & Mac N Cheese’

When it was Judge Susan Crawford's time to talk, she gave child rapist Curtis O'Brien...
Wisconsin's Rape Kit Strategy

EXCLUSIVE: Jill Karofsky Was an Architect of Wisconsin’s Rape Kit Strategy Before & During Brad Schimel’s AG Tenure

In multiple newspaper articles at the time, Jill Karofsky adamantly defended the Schimel DOJ's approach...
ryan withee

Ryan Withee, Missing: Where Is the Milwaukee Man?

“Yo, yo, I need help bro." That frantic-sounding message was written at 1:10 a.m. on April...
susan crawford

Brad Schimel Challenges Susan Crawford to Say ‘Men Are Men; Women Are Women’

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel is speaking out against Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' much-mocked...

Gov. Tony Evers Changes “Mother” to “Inseminated Person” in Budget Bill

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers introduced a budget bill this week that calls mothers an "inseminated...
josh kaul

‘Josh Kaul Called Me’: The Curious Timing of the AG’s ‘Fundraising’ Call

This is a column by Meg Ellefson, reprinted with permission from WSAU.com. This week, the unelected...

Susan Crawford’s ‘Mismanagement’ at DNR Led to ‘Terrible Time for Wisconsin Farmers’: Expert

As an official with the state DNR, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Susan Crawford orchestrated a...
brad schimel rape kits

Wisconsin DAs, Sheriffs Praise Brad Schimel For Fixing Rape Kit Backlog

Brad Schimel rape kit controversy: Top law enforcement officials say Susan Crawford is lying about...
susan crawford act 10

Act 10 Calculator: How Much More You’d Pay in Wisconsin Property Tax if It’s Overturned

"For an average Wisconsin home valued at $300,000, property taxes could increase by $624 or...
slinger trump sign

Slinger, Wisconsin Orders Elderly Couple to Take Down ‘God, Guns, Trump’ Sign

"We're battling to the end" - Cameron Merkel The Village of Slinger, Wisconsin, is ordering...
Daniel gonzales

How to Help Wounded Milwaukee Police Officer Daniel Gonzales

The Milwaukee Police Association has announced a donation fund to help wounded Milwaukee Police Officer...
brittany kinser

6 Things to Remember About Brittany Kinser’s Big Victory Tuesday

Moderate education reformer Brittany Kinser's big victory in a three-way primary on Tuesday night sets...
susan crawford

3 Killers of Dane Co. Man Will Soon All be Free Due to Judge Susan Crawford

They were involved in the brutal murder of a man who was beaten to death....
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Trump Gains More Ground in War Against DEI

A major shift is underway in the way large companies talk about and fund Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

President Donald Trump began the transition when he signed an executive order last month eliminating DEI policies and staff at the federal government and extending the anti-DEI policy to federal contractors.

Private companies, some of which had already begun the transition before Trump took office, remarkably began backing off their DEI policies, even if only symbolically with little internal change.

Costco resisted, pushing back on the Trump administration, but other major brands like Amazon Wal-Mart, Target, and Meta announced a pullback from DEI. Media reports indicated DEI discussions on earnings calls has plummeted.

Others, such as Wisconsin-based financial services company Fiserv, have not yet made a change, at least not publicly.

A murky legal future awaits companies willing to take the risk to stick with DEI policies, particularly in hiring.

Fiserv receives hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts.

According to Fiserv’s website’s Diversity & Inclusion page, the company is “committed to promoting diversity and inclusion (D&I) across all levels of the organization, in our communities and throughout our industry."

Fiserv says that it “partner[s] with people and organizations around the world to advance our D&I efforts and create opportunities for our employees, entrepreneurs around the world and the next generation of innovators.”

The company's diversity and inclusion page includes a careers section that discusses “engaging diverse talent” and events to connect with “diverse candidates.”

Critics of DEI initiatives and policies say they discriminate against white men and Asians and lead to hiring and promotion decisions based on factors such as race and sexual orientation rather than merit.

In its 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company boasted that "60% of director nominees for the 2024 annual meeting reflect gender or racial/ethnic diversity."

According to an April 2024 report from Payments Dive, Fiserv was “buoyed by sales to government entities” in Q1 of 2024 and reported $500 million in revenue from those contracts. The U.S. Coast Guard contracted with Fiserv in 2024 to help with payroll, according to HigherGov, among other government contracts.

Fiserv did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

A watershed moment against DEI came when during the Biden administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against longstanding affirmative action policies at American universities, one key example of white and Asian Americans being discriminated against.

Trump’s election has only solidified the new legal framework for what is permissible when considering race and gender in hiring, promotion, and workplace etiquette.

From Trump’s order:

In the private sector, many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism.

Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.

DEI has become increasingly controversial as activists use the moniker to advance every liberal policy on race and gender, often at taxpayer expense. In the federal government, DEI had become widespread and infiltrated into every part of governance, from racial quotas for promotions at the Pentagon to driving healthcare research at the National Institutes of Health.

At private companies, DEI policies guided investment decisions via ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) as well as personnel decisions with racial quotas for company board rooms. Those ideas are out of favor with the Trump administration.

Some of the companies resisting the shift from DEI could face legal action.

A coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to Costco alleging it is violating the law, as The Center Square previously reported.

“Although Costco’s motto is 'do the right thing,' it appears that the company is doing the wrong thing – clinging to DEI policies that courts and businesses have rejected as illegal,” the letter said.

This week, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against Starbucks for similar policies.

"By making employment decisions based on characteristics that have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well, Starbucks, for example, hires people by thumbing the scale based on at least one of Starbucks’ preferred immutable characteristics rather than an evaluation of an applicant’s merit and qualifications,” the lawsuit said. “Making hiring decision on non-merit considerations will skew the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri’s consumers."

A 2022 Starbucks document touts a DEI goal: “By 2025, our goal is to achieve BIPOC representation of at least 30% at all corporate levels and at least 40% at all retail and manufacturing roles.”

Bailey called the Starbucks policies discriminatory and illegal.

"With Starbucks’ discriminatory patterns, practices, and policies, Missouri’s consumers are required to pay higher prices and wait longer for goods and services that could be provided for less had Starbucks employed the most qualified workers, regardless of their race, color, sex, or national origin,” Bailey said. “As Attorney General, I have a moral and legal obligation to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks."

Vote Tuesday for Brittany Kinser If you Want Wisconsin Education Reform: Scott Frostman

The choice is clear. It’s not even close. It’s uncommon to have massive attention thrust...
U.S.-Canada Border

White House Touts Border Progress

The White House over the weekend touted its progress on the southern border as President Donald Trump completed his fourth week back in office.

"Encounters of illegal immigrants at our southern border are plummeting and migrants are starting to realize it’s fruitless to attempt to illegally cross our border," the White House said Saturday in a statement.

Upon taking office, Trump issued a series of executive orders ending Biden administration policies that allowed asylum seekers to flood into America. On his second day in office, the president sent 1,500 active-duty service members and additional air and intelligence assets.

Border crossing attempts are down more than 90% from the same time last year, according to data first obtained by the New York Post.

“Border numbers are down over 90% in three weeks,” Tom Homan, the pick by Trump called border czar, said during an interview on Fox News. “When you got 90% less people coming across the border, how many women aren’t being raped by the cartels? How many children aren’t drowning? How many women and children aren’t being sex trafficked in this country? President Trump is a gamechanger.”

Multiple media reports indicate many people headed from other countries to the United States have since changed their mind and headed back home.

The White House pointed out a Wednesday story from The Washington Times showing officials in Costa Rica and Panama are meeting to discuss how to handle the large number of people who had been waiting in Mexico to enter the United States but have since given up and are returning to South America.

The administration also linked a Thursday story from Telemundo saying "migrants from Honduras, El Salvador, Columbia and Venezuela are heading back home" instead of continuing to America. And the White House linked a Thursday story from El Cronista saying the Mexican government provided a $9.3 million contract for 140 shelters to help with people "returning to Mexico."

Policies during the Biden administration allowed 12 million people to enter the country, most given dates to appear with immigration officials much later. The volume pushed many of those appointments beyond a year and even 18 months. A surge in fentanyl accompanied the timing.

Trump, the second term Republican, has reversed the trend. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and specifically ICE Enforcement and Removal regional offices, across the country have helped move many people illegally in the country back to their native homelands.

Trump also threatened tariffs against Mexico if it did not help fix the problem. To temporarily avert the tariffs, Mexico’s president agreed to deploy thousands more troops to the southern border.

In another reversal, the Biden administration worked – including litigation – to block Texas from installing border security measures like barbed wire and buoys in the river to keep people from swimming across.

In a social media post Sunday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott wrote, “Texas installed more buoys into the Rio Grande the SAME day President Trump returned to office. The Biden administration tried – and FAILED – to keep Texas from using this effective border security tactic.

“Now, we have a President who is partnering with Texas to deny illegal entry.”

elon musk trump twitter

Musk Has No Time to Lose! [Up Against the Wall]

I love Elon’s sense of urgency. It’s no wonder he gets stuff done when others...

Book Excerpt: The Hollowing Out of Wisconsin Farmland

The following excerpt is from Wisconsin author Brian Reisinger’s “Land Rich, Cash Poor: My Family’s Hope...
lake mills

‘Bikers Against Predators’ Upset Lake Mills Police Didn’t Immediately Arrest Man in Sting

Update: Jail records show the man has now been booked into the Jefferson Co. Jail...