Friday, February 21, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Friday, February 21, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

EXCLUSIVE: Former Stepson Says Janet Protasiewicz Repeatedly Assaulted Elderly Judge [VIDEO]

spot_img

A family friend confirms Michael Madden told him about the alleged abuse when it was happening.

The former stepson of Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Janet Protasiewicz alleges that Protasiewicz repeatedly assaulted her then-husband – his elderly father Patrick J. Madden – by allegedly slapping Madden with an open hand so hard that she left part of a handprint on his face and aggressively pushing the 70-year-old veteran judge so forcefully that he injured his shoulder and almost fell.

Michael Madden told WRN in two lengthy interviews on different days that his father, a now deceased World War II and Korean War veteran who served on the Milwaukee County bench for 24 years, pulled the plug on his short marriage to Protasiewicz, then a 34-year-old assistant district attorney, because she repeatedly physically and verbally abused him.

Judge patrick madden
Judge patrick madden.

Michael Madden lived in the Fox Point home with his father and stepmother during their roughly nine-month marriage, and he says that he witnessed and heard the alleged abuse firsthand, which he said was fueled by intoxication.

“I saw it with my own two eyes,” he said.

“It was physical abuse brought on and fueled by alcoholism,” Michael alleged. He said he would “absolutely” characterize the abuse as assaults by Protasiewicz. “I would say it was elder abuse.” He says he would be willing to testify under oath and challenged Protasiewicz to sit with him at a kitchen table with journalists and discuss it.

At 1:12 p.m. on Tuesday, March 13, we asked Protasiewicz’s campaign if she wished to comment on Michael’s allegations that she physically assaulted his dad. We received no response and no denial.

Michael said his father had a “hand print on the side of his face and cheek. He would be very upset. He would say, ‘Well, there’s no blood,’ but it was clear there was a substantial strike. I think his feeling was if there wasn’t blood, he wasn’t doing anything further.” He said his father hoped “it went away” and was a gentle person who never struck Janet.

“I observed a red mark on the side of his face and ear. Janet was the person who delivered the slaps,” he said.

A family friend offered a point of corroboration, telling Wisconsin Right Now in a separate interview that Michael Madden told him on two occasions in 1997 that Protasiewicz had physically abused his father.

“I can corroborate him (Michael) telling me about this in the time frame of that marriage,” the man said.

We asked Michael to re-enact what he says Protasiewicz did to his 5-foot, 6-inch dad using our reporter in his father’s place. [Note on the videos in this article: Media outlets are free to air or use them with proper credit to WRN.] Watch:

“She was belligerent and pushed him and slapped him dozens of times, dozens of times,” Michael Madden said in an interview this week. “It happened on a fairly regular basis. At night, the whole thing would kind of break down. He was, again, 70 years old.”

“The pushing was close to knocking him over.”

Michael was 35 then, only a year older than Protasiewicz when she married Patrick Madden in 1997. Patrick Madden was 70 when he married Protasiewicz, who was less than half his age.

“It happened for months,” Michael said of the alleged abuse.

“I would say that she struck him and pushed him three or four times a week. My father was a very gentle guy, so he would try to get away.”

“He got knocked against the wall a couple of times. If there wouldn’t have been a wall there, yes, he would have gone over on the ground. I saw it with my own two eyes.”

“I saw it many times.”

“I don’t believe she is qualified” for the state Supreme Court, he said.

The 1997 marriage between Protasiewicz and Judge Madden disintegrated at warp speed; in less than a year, it was over. Wisconsin Right Now has reviewed hundreds of pages of divorce records in the case, which grew so nasty that a key point of contention was a battle over a family grave plot. The Maddens said Janet wanted to be buried next to the judge’s first, long-term wife, who died of cancer about six months before the marriage, leaving Patrick vulnerable and lonely.

“The matter of the gravestone – she wanted to be buried on my mother’s side, which was, you know. everybody was aghast at that, but she was digging in on that one, at that point,” Michael said.

Michael said he heard Protasiewicz call his father “dumb and stupid.”

“Janet was more interested in his name and position and the money she perceived he had than him as a person,” he believes.

During the divorce, Protasiewicz contested a prenup by saying she signed it without reading it and alleged the marriage was a “fraud,” but a judge did not side with her on much, court records show.

Protasiewicz repeatedly assaulted

Michael Madden did not contact the media. Rather, he first spoke about Protasiewicz when a door walker for state Senate candidate Dan Knodl randomly knocked on his door and asked him about the race. This filtered back to us, and we contacted Madden. He said he also told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Dan Bice about the alleged physical abuse when Bice contacted his family out of the blue and came over to his house with the Protasiewicz/Judge Madden divorce file. Bice has not run a story. In short, Michael was contacted by the media; he wasn’t looking for media attention.

Numerous times, Michael gave nuanced answers to our questions, at times providing answers that were better for Protasiewicz. For example, we asked if he ever saw Janet punch his father with a closed fist, and he said no.

Bice did write a story about the divorce battle of the other liberal candidate in the state Supreme Court primary, Dane County Judge Everett Mitchell, who is African-American. Mitchell’s estranged wife accused Mitchell of sexual assault during a contentious divorce; Mitchell denied the accusations. “State Supreme Court candidate Everett Mitchell was accused by his ex-wife of sexually assaulting her at the end of their time together — though the accusation was never investigated or prosecuted,” Bice’s story read.

Bice also wrote a story about unproven allegations against conservative candidate Jennifer Dorow’s 19-year-old son, who was never arrested nor charged in a drug death. Unlike Michael Madden, who is on the record and on video, Bice’s key sources in the Dorow story did not use their names.

As a result, Michael believes Bice’s failure to report his allegations constitutes a “double standard.”

Protasiewicz was Michael Madden’s stepmother for about nine months in 1997, court records confirm. Court records confirm that Michael Madden lived in the Fox Point house during the marriage with the couple; he still lives there today. In fact, a key reason the marriage fell apart was that Protasiewicz was allegedly unhappy that Michael lived in the residence, according to court records. She sought an annulment, and Patrick responded by asking for a divorce, and the judge granted the latter, dramatically reducing the amount of money Protasiewicz was seeking.

The court records do not mention physical abuse, although the divorce battle grew ugly. We asked Michael about this, and he said that his father wanted to keep it private and out of the papers and didn’t think he needed it because Wisconsin is a no-fault divorce state. He said his father was an older generation Navy veteran who was a retired reserve judge at the time and wasn’t the type to tell the outside world about abuse.

Judge Madden died in 2018. His obituary doesn’t mention Protasiewicz.


The Family Friend Offers Some Corroboration

The close family friend of the Maddens, who was at the home many times, offered some corroboration for Michael’s story in a lengthy interview with two journalists from Wisconsin Right Now. He did not want his name printed. We know his name, however, and spoke with him at length.

We asked what Michael told him back in 1997. “That his father had been struck by her, slapped more than once in his presence, and this was something that he just did not, he couldn’t condone this, and this was going to be a problem,” he said. “He said it more than once, so that’s why it sticks.”

“I believe there was at least one pushing incident,” the family friend added.

The family friend said he also knew Judge Madden’s deceased first wife, Virginia, Michael’s mother. His parents were close friends with them. The family friend says he told his mother about the alleged abuse, but she did not seem surprised. She is now deceased.

The friend said that Judge Madden changed after marrying Protasiewicz and “wasn’t as talkative when I was over there. I could see the difference in his (Michael’s) father.” He was less joyful, he said.

The family friend said Michael told him there was “verbal and physical abuse; there is no doubt about it that there was verbal abuse as well.” He did not personally witness it, however.

“My firsthand account would be being at the house seeing a large amount of alcohol being ingested, especially on her part,” he said.

“When you see somebody like Judge Madden, I don’t think he ever wanted any of this information to go to public,” the man added.

We asked Judge Madden’s two other children, Sheila Casey and Dr. Mark Madden, whether they knew of the abuse. Neither said they did, but they said that wouldn’t be surprising because they did not live in the home as Michael did. Their father was a proud and private World War II generation Navy veteran who wouldn’t run around sharing that he was allegedly being abused. They also did not dispute it.

Mark Madden said that his father did call him and informed him that his marriage to Protasiewicz was “not fixable.” Neither Casey nor Dr. Madden has a positive impression of Protasiewicz, whom they believe allegedly manipulated their father into marriage and wasn’t honest during the divorce hearing.

“Dad wasn’t one to really let the dirty laundry fly,” Dr. Madden said. “Something happened to make him proceed with divorce.”

“Do I trust her? No. Did she lie a lot? Yes,” Casey alleged of Protasiewicz.


 

Patrick madden
Judge patrick madden.

A vulnerable widower

When his mother died somewhat suddenly of cancer, Michael said, his father was “at a loss even to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.” He described his dad as “extremely vulnerable” and someone who had “never really been on his own.”

According to Michael, “my mother and father weren’t big drinkers.” Once Protasiewicz moved in, “I started seeing a lot of drinking going on, and it was most prominent with Janet,” said Michael. “She would drink quite a bit. We would go through bottles of Jack Daniels pretty regularly.”

We asked Michael to detail the alleged abuse.

“The drinking really escalated everything, and it got worse and worse,” he said. “And, for instance, he (Judge Madden) tried to get up from the couch back there, which you see there’s a narrow pathway to the back of the house, and she would block him and push him and, you know, he’s 70 years old. You don’t want your dad to fall.”

He continued: “So, I sometimes would have to say, ‘Hey, knock it off, just go to bed.’ That sometimes worked. Sometimes it just escalated from there.” He added, “I had to tell her on several occasions – it is my business; that’s my father. And she would get very angry. She might disappear back into the room, and you wouldn’t see her until the next day. She would go to work. It would start up the next day.”

He added, “I saw it on a daily basis” because he wasn’t working and was home every day.

Michael said the conflict with Janet made his father worried it would push him to a stroke. His father complained of pain to his ears and shoulder, he said.

His dad did not call the police, he said, choosing instead to divorce Protasiewicz before it got to that point and ended up in the newspaper.

“She was hitting harder and harder,” Michael alleged. “Again, I said to him, ‘What happens if I’m not here, and it goes longer? You might have to call the police.'” He did not ever do that however, Michael said. Janet has not been arrested or charged in connection with the accusations.

We asked Michael Madden whether he has ever spoken with former Justice Dan Kelly, who is running against Protasiewicz, now a judge herself, for state Supreme Court, and he said no. We asked if he has ever been a member of the Republican Party, and he said no, although he said he usually votes for conservatives. His father was a staunch conservative, he said.

Michael Madden spent time in federal prison for marijuana distribution in 1992 and was placed on probation for cocaine dealing in 1986, although he has no Wisconsin state criminal history since. He was on probation when his father was married to Protasiewicz, and as a result, he said he was not drinking or using drugs during that time period.

Michael speaks about this portion of his life forthrightly.

“Yes, I was convicted of selling and delivering drugs on two occasions,” he told WRN. “I took my punishment. I completed my punishment without any problems.” He said he promised his parents that he was done with drugs and that he lived up to that promise, adding that his only trouble since 1992 has been a speeding ticket. Wisconsin court records back that up.

Protasiewicz, a Milwaukee County judge, is remarried to a Milwaukee-area lawyer.

“It was fueled by her alcohol use. I don’t know if she’s ever gotten help for that,” Michael says.

The conservative Judge Madden, who carried a copy of the U.S Constitution in his pocket, wrote about his pro-life views and his beliefs on divorce in a letter to the editor to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “Any society that champions the judge-created right of a woman to destroy her own offspring and opens the door to ‘no-fault’ divorce strikes at the very foundations of civility,” he wrote, adding, “No one can object to abortions that are truly to protect the life of the mother – nor can anyone object to legal separations from abusive spouses.” He wrote the letter before he married Protasiewicz, however.

Protasiewicz repeatedly assaulted
Janet with judge madden.

Court records show that, according to a brief from Janet’s lawyer, Patrick Madden testified that after a mere 10 months of marriage, Patrick told Janet that he had a “bombshell,” which was a request for divorce. His stated reason was that his adult son Michael had found the addendum to the marital property agreement and was disturbed about a transfer of a grave plot to Janet.

She offered to return the grave plot in an effort to save the marriage, but he declined, Patrick testified, according to that brief.

In her affidavit, Protasiewicz said after a full day at work and without warning, she was asked to vacate her home with virtually only the clothing on her back. Patrick offered Janet money for one night’s lodging in a hotel, she alleged in court documents.

Janet entered the marriage in good faith “and with a now destroyed belief that Patrick was a good, honest, and responsible man,” the court records said.

The marriage “created a great deal of hostility in Janet. The level of this hostility shows its teeth in Janet’s outrageous demands,” Patrick Madden’s lawyer wrote.

There are two more stories in this series. They will be running on Thursday and Friday. You can see part 1 here. In it, Michael Madden and his brother Mark Madden alleged that Protasiewicz, when they knew her, was pro-life and had conservative views on immigration. She is now running as a liberal pro-abortion activist.

Susan Crawford’s ‘Mismanagement’ at DNR Led to ‘Terrible Time for Wisconsin Farmers’: Expert

As an official with the state DNR, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Susan Crawford orchestrated a...
brad schimel rape kits

Wisconsin DAs, Sheriffs Praise Brad Schimel For Fixing Rape Kit Backlog

Brad Schimel rape kit controversy: Top law enforcement officials say Susan Crawford is lying about...
susan crawford act 10

Act 10 Calculator: How Much More You’d Pay in Wisconsin Property Tax if It’s Overturned

"For an average Wisconsin home valued at $300,000, property taxes could increase by $624 or...
slinger trump sign

Slinger, Wisconsin Orders Elderly Couple to Take Down ‘God, Guns, Trump’ Sign

"We're battling to the end" - Cameron Merkel The Village of Slinger, Wisconsin, is ordering...
Daniel gonzales

How to Help Wounded Milwaukee Police Officer Daniel Gonzales

The Milwaukee Police Association has announced a donation fund to help wounded Milwaukee Police Officer...
brittany kinser

6 Things to Remember About Brittany Kinser’s Big Victory Tuesday

Moderate education reformer Brittany Kinser's big victory in a three-way primary on Tuesday night sets...
susan crawford

3 Killers of Dane Co. Man Will Soon All be Free Due to Judge Susan Crawford

They were involved in the brutal murder of a man who was beaten to death....
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Trump Gains More Ground in War Against DEI

A major shift is underway in the way large companies talk about and fund Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

President Donald Trump began the transition when he signed an executive order last month eliminating DEI policies and staff at the federal government and extending the anti-DEI policy to federal contractors.

Private companies, some of which had already begun the transition before Trump took office, remarkably began backing off their DEI policies, even if only symbolically with little internal change.

Costco resisted, pushing back on the Trump administration, but other major brands like Amazon Wal-Mart, Target, and Meta announced a pullback from DEI. Media reports indicated DEI discussions on earnings calls has plummeted.

Others, such as Wisconsin-based financial services company Fiserv, have not yet made a change, at least not publicly.

A murky legal future awaits companies willing to take the risk to stick with DEI policies, particularly in hiring.

Fiserv receives hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts.

According to Fiserv’s website’s Diversity & Inclusion page, the company is “committed to promoting diversity and inclusion (D&I) across all levels of the organization, in our communities and throughout our industry."

Fiserv says that it “partner[s] with people and organizations around the world to advance our D&I efforts and create opportunities for our employees, entrepreneurs around the world and the next generation of innovators.”

The company's diversity and inclusion page includes a careers section that discusses “engaging diverse talent” and events to connect with “diverse candidates.”

Critics of DEI initiatives and policies say they discriminate against white men and Asians and lead to hiring and promotion decisions based on factors such as race and sexual orientation rather than merit.

In its 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company boasted that "60% of director nominees for the 2024 annual meeting reflect gender or racial/ethnic diversity."

According to an April 2024 report from Payments Dive, Fiserv was “buoyed by sales to government entities” in Q1 of 2024 and reported $500 million in revenue from those contracts. The U.S. Coast Guard contracted with Fiserv in 2024 to help with payroll, according to HigherGov, among other government contracts.

Fiserv did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

A watershed moment against DEI came when during the Biden administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against longstanding affirmative action policies at American universities, one key example of white and Asian Americans being discriminated against.

Trump’s election has only solidified the new legal framework for what is permissible when considering race and gender in hiring, promotion, and workplace etiquette.

From Trump’s order:

In the private sector, many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism.

Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.

DEI has become increasingly controversial as activists use the moniker to advance every liberal policy on race and gender, often at taxpayer expense. In the federal government, DEI had become widespread and infiltrated into every part of governance, from racial quotas for promotions at the Pentagon to driving healthcare research at the National Institutes of Health.

At private companies, DEI policies guided investment decisions via ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) as well as personnel decisions with racial quotas for company board rooms. Those ideas are out of favor with the Trump administration.

Some of the companies resisting the shift from DEI could face legal action.

A coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to Costco alleging it is violating the law, as The Center Square previously reported.

“Although Costco’s motto is 'do the right thing,' it appears that the company is doing the wrong thing – clinging to DEI policies that courts and businesses have rejected as illegal,” the letter said.

This week, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against Starbucks for similar policies.

"By making employment decisions based on characteristics that have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well, Starbucks, for example, hires people by thumbing the scale based on at least one of Starbucks’ preferred immutable characteristics rather than an evaluation of an applicant’s merit and qualifications,” the lawsuit said. “Making hiring decision on non-merit considerations will skew the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri’s consumers."

A 2022 Starbucks document touts a DEI goal: “By 2025, our goal is to achieve BIPOC representation of at least 30% at all corporate levels and at least 40% at all retail and manufacturing roles.”

Bailey called the Starbucks policies discriminatory and illegal.

"With Starbucks’ discriminatory patterns, practices, and policies, Missouri’s consumers are required to pay higher prices and wait longer for goods and services that could be provided for less had Starbucks employed the most qualified workers, regardless of their race, color, sex, or national origin,” Bailey said. “As Attorney General, I have a moral and legal obligation to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks."

Vote Tuesday for Brittany Kinser If you Want Wisconsin Education Reform: Scott Frostman

The choice is clear. It’s not even close. It’s uncommon to have massive attention thrust...
U.S.-Canada Border

White House Touts Border Progress

The White House over the weekend touted its progress on the southern border as President Donald Trump completed his fourth week back in office.

"Encounters of illegal immigrants at our southern border are plummeting and migrants are starting to realize it’s fruitless to attempt to illegally cross our border," the White House said Saturday in a statement.

Upon taking office, Trump issued a series of executive orders ending Biden administration policies that allowed asylum seekers to flood into America. On his second day in office, the president sent 1,500 active-duty service members and additional air and intelligence assets.

Border crossing attempts are down more than 90% from the same time last year, according to data first obtained by the New York Post.

“Border numbers are down over 90% in three weeks,” Tom Homan, the pick by Trump called border czar, said during an interview on Fox News. “When you got 90% less people coming across the border, how many women aren’t being raped by the cartels? How many children aren’t drowning? How many women and children aren’t being sex trafficked in this country? President Trump is a gamechanger.”

Multiple media reports indicate many people headed from other countries to the United States have since changed their mind and headed back home.

The White House pointed out a Wednesday story from The Washington Times showing officials in Costa Rica and Panama are meeting to discuss how to handle the large number of people who had been waiting in Mexico to enter the United States but have since given up and are returning to South America.

The administration also linked a Thursday story from Telemundo saying "migrants from Honduras, El Salvador, Columbia and Venezuela are heading back home" instead of continuing to America. And the White House linked a Thursday story from El Cronista saying the Mexican government provided a $9.3 million contract for 140 shelters to help with people "returning to Mexico."

Policies during the Biden administration allowed 12 million people to enter the country, most given dates to appear with immigration officials much later. The volume pushed many of those appointments beyond a year and even 18 months. A surge in fentanyl accompanied the timing.

Trump, the second term Republican, has reversed the trend. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and specifically ICE Enforcement and Removal regional offices, across the country have helped move many people illegally in the country back to their native homelands.

Trump also threatened tariffs against Mexico if it did not help fix the problem. To temporarily avert the tariffs, Mexico’s president agreed to deploy thousands more troops to the southern border.

In another reversal, the Biden administration worked – including litigation – to block Texas from installing border security measures like barbed wire and buoys in the river to keep people from swimming across.

In a social media post Sunday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott wrote, “Texas installed more buoys into the Rio Grande the SAME day President Trump returned to office. The Biden administration tried – and FAILED – to keep Texas from using this effective border security tactic.

“Now, we have a President who is partnering with Texas to deny illegal entry.”

elon musk trump twitter

Musk Has No Time to Lose! [Up Against the Wall]

I love Elon’s sense of urgency. It’s no wonder he gets stuff done when others...

Book Excerpt: The Hollowing Out of Wisconsin Farmland

The following excerpt is from Wisconsin author Brian Reisinger’s “Land Rich, Cash Poor: My Family’s Hope...
lake mills

‘Bikers Against Predators’ Upset Lake Mills Police Didn’t Immediately Arrest Man in Sting

Update: Jail records show the man has now been booked into the Jefferson Co. Jail...
brad schimel rape kit

Wisconsin Judge Susan Crawford’s DISHONEST Rape Kit Attack Disregards Victims’ Wishes

Susan Crawford's rape kit attack on Brad Schimel is dishonest in many ways and blatantly...
bradley wolf

6th Offense Drunk Drivers Got a Break in Wisconsin Judge Susan Crawford’s Courtroom

A 6th-offense drunk driver named Bradley Wolf caught a break when he landed in the...
whitewater

There Are ‘Indicators’ That Tren de Aragua May Be in Whitewater: Sheriffs

Two sheriffs say there are indicators that members of the Tren de Aragua gang may...
isaiah stott

Isaiah Walker Stott: Milwaukee Gunman Posted Anti-Trump Video, Sources Say

Three sources told Wisconsin Right Now that the Milwaukee Police Department believes the gunman who...
cavalier johnson mpd

MPD Officers IRATE After Mayor Cavalier Johnson Post Says Suspect’s Death Is a ‘Tragedy’

Milwaukee police officers anxiously awaiting news of their wounded colleague's condition are irate after a...
milwaukee police officer shot

Milwaukee Police Officer Shot at 27th & Wisconsin

A 34-year-old Milwaukee police officer was shot at 27th and Wisconsin today by a rifle-toting...
susan crawford act 10

Wisconsin Judge Susan Crawford Tries to Hide Her Anti Voter ID Activism

Why isn't Susan Crawford being honest with voters about her anti-Voter ID activism? New reports say...