Saturday, February 22, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Saturday, February 22, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Jon Ehr Adamantly Repeats on Audio That Janet Protasiewicz Used Racial Slurs, Physically Abused Husband

spot_img

Jon Ehr, a former Milwaukee restaurant/bar owner, adamantly repeated on Wednesday night that he personally witnessed Janet Protasiewicz physically abuse her elderly husband and heard Protasiewicz use racial slurs in a “derogatory” fashion about Blacks and Hispanics, including the “N word.”


Listen to Ehr’s full Wednesday interview here:


 

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel confirmed on Wednesday that Ehr, a self-described liberal who used to own the Ardmore on the Marquette campus, also told the newspaper’s reporters that Protasiewicz pushed her former husband, retired Milwaukee County Judge Patrick J. Madden.

Madden’s son, Michael Madden, also told both WRN and the Journal Sentinel that he saw Protasiewicz physically assault his dad and heard her use the “N word.”

That means that the state’s largest newspaper has confirmed our reporting – that two men, Ehr and Michael Madden, say they saw Protasiewicz physically abuse the judge.

However, the Journal Sentinel did not tell readers that Ehr is also accusing Protasiewicz of using racial slurs.

“Did you hear Janet Protasiewicz say racial slurs?” we asked Ehr on Wednesday night, March 22, 2023.

“Did I hear Janet say racial slurs? Yes. I heard her say the ‘N word,’ and I heard her say ‘beaner.'” Ehr then spelled out the “N word.”

Protasiewicz has avoided discussing Ehr by name. She told the Wisconsin Law Journal, “These claims are completely false, devoid of proof and are only being made by a bitter, discredited, drug-dealing felon who will say anything to get attention,” referring to Michael Madden, her former stepson, who has a drug dealing history dating to the 1980s and early 1990s, but nothing since. [We also have 4 other sources who say that either Michael or Judge Madden told them about the physical abuse allegations years ago.]

However, both men say they saw injuries on the 70-year-old Judge Madden’s face that Judge Madden said were caused by Protasiewicz, then 34. The allegations center around a time period in 1997 when Protasiewicz, then a prosecutor, was married for nine months to the elderly judge.

Janet protasiewicz husband
Janet protasiewicz and her ex-husband, judge patrick madden.

However, Ehr told Wisconsin Right Now on Wednesday night that Wisconsin Law Journal reporter Steve Schuster lied when he reported that Ehr did not tell Schuster that he observed the physical abuse. Ehr said Schuster did not ask him about the racial slurs at all, which surprised him.

We had previously reported on Ehr’s allegations, but we contacted him again because of a factual error-riddled story posted by the Wisconsin Law Journal on Wednesday night and a bizarrely hostile interview by the publication’s Managing Editor Steve Schuster.

In a story riddled with serious factual errors, Schuster claimed that he reached out to three sources provided by Wisconsin Right Now (Protasiewicz’s former stepsons Michael and Mark Madden and Ehr.) Schuster wrote that only Michael Madden said he had “observed the allegations.” This surprised us because Ehr was so firm with us (and is on audio) in two previous interviews, and he also told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he saw Protasiewicz push Judge Madden.

So we called him up again and asked him about it.

Specifically, we asked Ehr, 65, what he told Schuster about the allegations.

“I told him what I remember seeing. I can see it very clearly, them sitting on the couch. Her giving him a big whack on the chest with her arm because he said something or did something that he didn’t like. I think Judge was actually reading a book at the time, and she gave him a big whack.”

“There was another time that they were standing on a slate area in their home, and she was rushing to get out of the house for some reason and pushing him and shoving him in a way you shouldn’t be pushing and shoving a 70-year-old man. And he would say, ‘Hey wait, stop pushing me; you’re going to make me fall,'” said Ehr.

We asked Ehr: “Did you tell Steve Schuster that you saw Judge Madden physically abused by Janet Protasiewicz?”

“I did say that, yes. Yes, I did,” Ehr told us.

We asked Ehr whether he believed “this was physical abuse; that it crossed a line?”

“I definitely do, yes,” he said, adding, “Another time, I saw physical abuse on Judge Madden’s body. I stopped over at Judge Madden’s house.” He said he was with his father, a now-deceased Milwaukee attorney who had known Judge Madden for years.

“My dad noticed the redness on his cheek and near his ear and his neck, and he commented to the judge, ‘What happened judge; did you trip and fall?’ and he said, ‘Oh no, that’s her. She did that.’ My dad said, ‘Who?’ He said, ‘Janet. She was drinking and gave me a good whack.’ He said, ‘Tom (Ehr’s dad), I’m in a bad way. Tom, I’ve witnessed this stuff all my life in courts, and now I’m involved in it personally. I really just don’t know what to do.'”

Jon ehr
Jon ehr.

Continued Ehr: “I am sure they talked about it the following day. He was very upset about it all, Judge Madden, and my father was as well. And my father told my mother and we spoke about it several times.”

Ehr said that Schuster did not ask him about the injuries to Madden’s face. “He didn’t bother to go down that route with me; he was very short. I asked him, ‘Are you going to ask me some questions?’ and he asked if I was getting paid. He asked if I was a close friend of Mike’s and how I knew Mike.”

We asked, “To be clear, did anyone pay you?”

“Never, no,” Ehr responded.

“Did anyone pressure you?” we asked.

“Nope. No one pressured me, no,” said Ehr.

We told Ehr that Schuster told WRN on Wednesday night that Ehr did not say anything about seeing physical abuse to him.

Judge patrick madden
Judge patrick madden.

“He’s lying because I did tell him about the physical, and he never asked me about the racial,” Ehr said. “I didn’t bring it up. I was expecting him to ask me questions. It’s his interview. I don’t know why he didn’t ask me about the racial slurs, but he didn’t.”

Ehr repeated that Schuster would be lying if he said that Ehr did not tell him about the alleged physical abuse.

He confirmed he spoke with Corri Hess of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Since the newspaper did not mention Ehr in relation to the racial slur allegations at all, we asked Ehr whether Hess asked him about the racial slurs.

He had trouble remembering whether or not she had.

As for the racial slurs, we asked where he was when he allegedly heard those things. “I was in the dining room, at the south end.” He said he was “no more than 15 feet way.” He says he doesn’t remember the context of the conversation, but he did remember the tone.

“Well, that time she used the ‘N word,’ I think twice and the beaner once.” He said she wasn’t cordial toward him because he was friends with Michael Madden. He said that was “really strange.”

“However, do you remember the tone? Do you think she was being negative or derogatory toward Blacks and Hispanics?” we asked.

“Oh yeah, I do,” he said. He said it was “like she was fed up or mad or something.”

“So again, what would you say the tone was?” we asked.

“Derogatory,” he said.

Gov. Tony Evers Changes “Mother” to “Inseminated Person” in Budget Bill

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers introduced a budget bill this week that calls mothers an "inseminated...
josh kaul

‘Josh Kaul Called Me’: The Curious Timing of the AG’s ‘Fundraising’ Call

This is a column by Meg Ellefson, reprinted with permission from WSAU.com. This week, the unelected...

Susan Crawford’s ‘Mismanagement’ at DNR Led to ‘Terrible Time for Wisconsin Farmers’: Expert

As an official with the state DNR, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Susan Crawford orchestrated a...
brad schimel rape kits

Wisconsin DAs, Sheriffs Praise Brad Schimel For Fixing Rape Kit Backlog

Brad Schimel rape kit controversy: Top law enforcement officials say Susan Crawford is lying about...
susan crawford act 10

Act 10 Calculator: How Much More You’d Pay in Wisconsin Property Tax if It’s Overturned

"For an average Wisconsin home valued at $300,000, property taxes could increase by $624 or...
slinger trump sign

Slinger, Wisconsin Orders Elderly Couple to Take Down ‘God, Guns, Trump’ Sign

"We're battling to the end" - Cameron Merkel The Village of Slinger, Wisconsin, is ordering...
Daniel gonzales

How to Help Wounded Milwaukee Police Officer Daniel Gonzales

The Milwaukee Police Association has announced a donation fund to help wounded Milwaukee Police Officer...
brittany kinser

6 Things to Remember About Brittany Kinser’s Big Victory Tuesday

Moderate education reformer Brittany Kinser's big victory in a three-way primary on Tuesday night sets...
susan crawford

3 Killers of Dane Co. Man Will Soon All be Free Due to Judge Susan Crawford

They were involved in the brutal murder of a man who was beaten to death....
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Trump Gains More Ground in War Against DEI

A major shift is underway in the way large companies talk about and fund Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

President Donald Trump began the transition when he signed an executive order last month eliminating DEI policies and staff at the federal government and extending the anti-DEI policy to federal contractors.

Private companies, some of which had already begun the transition before Trump took office, remarkably began backing off their DEI policies, even if only symbolically with little internal change.

Costco resisted, pushing back on the Trump administration, but other major brands like Amazon Wal-Mart, Target, and Meta announced a pullback from DEI. Media reports indicated DEI discussions on earnings calls has plummeted.

Others, such as Wisconsin-based financial services company Fiserv, have not yet made a change, at least not publicly.

A murky legal future awaits companies willing to take the risk to stick with DEI policies, particularly in hiring.

Fiserv receives hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts.

According to Fiserv’s website’s Diversity & Inclusion page, the company is “committed to promoting diversity and inclusion (D&I) across all levels of the organization, in our communities and throughout our industry."

Fiserv says that it “partner[s] with people and organizations around the world to advance our D&I efforts and create opportunities for our employees, entrepreneurs around the world and the next generation of innovators.”

The company's diversity and inclusion page includes a careers section that discusses “engaging diverse talent” and events to connect with “diverse candidates.”

Critics of DEI initiatives and policies say they discriminate against white men and Asians and lead to hiring and promotion decisions based on factors such as race and sexual orientation rather than merit.

In its 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company boasted that "60% of director nominees for the 2024 annual meeting reflect gender or racial/ethnic diversity."

According to an April 2024 report from Payments Dive, Fiserv was “buoyed by sales to government entities” in Q1 of 2024 and reported $500 million in revenue from those contracts. The U.S. Coast Guard contracted with Fiserv in 2024 to help with payroll, according to HigherGov, among other government contracts.

Fiserv did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

A watershed moment against DEI came when during the Biden administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against longstanding affirmative action policies at American universities, one key example of white and Asian Americans being discriminated against.

Trump’s election has only solidified the new legal framework for what is permissible when considering race and gender in hiring, promotion, and workplace etiquette.

From Trump’s order:

In the private sector, many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism.

Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.

DEI has become increasingly controversial as activists use the moniker to advance every liberal policy on race and gender, often at taxpayer expense. In the federal government, DEI had become widespread and infiltrated into every part of governance, from racial quotas for promotions at the Pentagon to driving healthcare research at the National Institutes of Health.

At private companies, DEI policies guided investment decisions via ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) as well as personnel decisions with racial quotas for company board rooms. Those ideas are out of favor with the Trump administration.

Some of the companies resisting the shift from DEI could face legal action.

A coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to Costco alleging it is violating the law, as The Center Square previously reported.

“Although Costco’s motto is 'do the right thing,' it appears that the company is doing the wrong thing – clinging to DEI policies that courts and businesses have rejected as illegal,” the letter said.

This week, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against Starbucks for similar policies.

"By making employment decisions based on characteristics that have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well, Starbucks, for example, hires people by thumbing the scale based on at least one of Starbucks’ preferred immutable characteristics rather than an evaluation of an applicant’s merit and qualifications,” the lawsuit said. “Making hiring decision on non-merit considerations will skew the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri’s consumers."

A 2022 Starbucks document touts a DEI goal: “By 2025, our goal is to achieve BIPOC representation of at least 30% at all corporate levels and at least 40% at all retail and manufacturing roles.”

Bailey called the Starbucks policies discriminatory and illegal.

"With Starbucks’ discriminatory patterns, practices, and policies, Missouri’s consumers are required to pay higher prices and wait longer for goods and services that could be provided for less had Starbucks employed the most qualified workers, regardless of their race, color, sex, or national origin,” Bailey said. “As Attorney General, I have a moral and legal obligation to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks."

Vote Tuesday for Brittany Kinser If you Want Wisconsin Education Reform: Scott Frostman

The choice is clear. It’s not even close. It’s uncommon to have massive attention thrust...
U.S.-Canada Border

White House Touts Border Progress

The White House over the weekend touted its progress on the southern border as President Donald Trump completed his fourth week back in office.

"Encounters of illegal immigrants at our southern border are plummeting and migrants are starting to realize it’s fruitless to attempt to illegally cross our border," the White House said Saturday in a statement.

Upon taking office, Trump issued a series of executive orders ending Biden administration policies that allowed asylum seekers to flood into America. On his second day in office, the president sent 1,500 active-duty service members and additional air and intelligence assets.

Border crossing attempts are down more than 90% from the same time last year, according to data first obtained by the New York Post.

“Border numbers are down over 90% in three weeks,” Tom Homan, the pick by Trump called border czar, said during an interview on Fox News. “When you got 90% less people coming across the border, how many women aren’t being raped by the cartels? How many children aren’t drowning? How many women and children aren’t being sex trafficked in this country? President Trump is a gamechanger.”

Multiple media reports indicate many people headed from other countries to the United States have since changed their mind and headed back home.

The White House pointed out a Wednesday story from The Washington Times showing officials in Costa Rica and Panama are meeting to discuss how to handle the large number of people who had been waiting in Mexico to enter the United States but have since given up and are returning to South America.

The administration also linked a Thursday story from Telemundo saying "migrants from Honduras, El Salvador, Columbia and Venezuela are heading back home" instead of continuing to America. And the White House linked a Thursday story from El Cronista saying the Mexican government provided a $9.3 million contract for 140 shelters to help with people "returning to Mexico."

Policies during the Biden administration allowed 12 million people to enter the country, most given dates to appear with immigration officials much later. The volume pushed many of those appointments beyond a year and even 18 months. A surge in fentanyl accompanied the timing.

Trump, the second term Republican, has reversed the trend. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and specifically ICE Enforcement and Removal regional offices, across the country have helped move many people illegally in the country back to their native homelands.

Trump also threatened tariffs against Mexico if it did not help fix the problem. To temporarily avert the tariffs, Mexico’s president agreed to deploy thousands more troops to the southern border.

In another reversal, the Biden administration worked – including litigation – to block Texas from installing border security measures like barbed wire and buoys in the river to keep people from swimming across.

In a social media post Sunday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott wrote, “Texas installed more buoys into the Rio Grande the SAME day President Trump returned to office. The Biden administration tried – and FAILED – to keep Texas from using this effective border security tactic.

“Now, we have a President who is partnering with Texas to deny illegal entry.”

elon musk trump twitter

Musk Has No Time to Lose! [Up Against the Wall]

I love Elon’s sense of urgency. It’s no wonder he gets stuff done when others...

Book Excerpt: The Hollowing Out of Wisconsin Farmland

The following excerpt is from Wisconsin author Brian Reisinger’s “Land Rich, Cash Poor: My Family’s Hope...
lake mills

‘Bikers Against Predators’ Upset Lake Mills Police Didn’t Immediately Arrest Man in Sting

Update: Jail records show the man has now been booked into the Jefferson Co. Jail...
brad schimel rape kit

Wisconsin Judge Susan Crawford’s DISHONEST Rape Kit Attack Disregards Victims’ Wishes

Susan Crawford's rape kit attack on Brad Schimel is dishonest in many ways and blatantly...
bradley wolf

6th Offense Drunk Drivers Got a Break in Wisconsin Judge Susan Crawford’s Courtroom

A 6th-offense drunk driver named Bradley Wolf caught a break when he landed in the...
whitewater

There Are ‘Indicators’ That Tren de Aragua May Be in Whitewater: Sheriffs

Two sheriffs say there are indicators that members of the Tren de Aragua gang may...
isaiah stott

Isaiah Walker Stott: Milwaukee Gunman Posted Anti-Trump Video, Sources Say

Three sources told Wisconsin Right Now that the Milwaukee Police Department believes the gunman who...
cavalier johnson mpd

MPD Officers IRATE After Mayor Cavalier Johnson Post Says Suspect’s Death Is a ‘Tragedy’

Milwaukee police officers anxiously awaiting news of their wounded colleague's condition are irate after a...