Monday, March 3, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Monday, March 3, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Gov. Evers, If You Disagreed With Parole Chairman Tate’s Decisions, Why Did You Reappoint Him AFTER Killers’ Releases?

spot_img

After nearly two weeks of dodging the issue, Gov. Tony Evers issued a terse, vague statement saying that he “disagreed” with some of his own Parole Commission chairman appointee’s decisions, without naming them. However, the fact is that Evers reappointed that chairman, John Tate, AFTER many heinous killers and rapists were freed, saying he was “pleased” to do so.

He did not explain why he reappointed Tate if he disagreed with his decisions, nor did he specify the cases he disagreed with. Evers has been completely silent on the fact his Parole Commission did not notify multiple victims’ families that the vicious killers of their loved ones were released.

For example, Evers, who first appointed Tate to begin serving in June 2019, remained silent for years and is still silent about the parole of wife murderer Carl Beletsky, who decapitated his wife and burned her head in a stove. Beletsky was released in August 2019 to Hatley, Wisconsin. Evers reappointed Tate two years later. That’s just one example. There are many more.

Parole chairman tate

We have a challenge for Evers: Would he want his wife, kids or grandkids to live next door to Beletsky? Why should residents of Hatley have to do so?

There are many other horrific cases, as Wisconsin Right Now has been documenting in a daily series. Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, who was in a position of leadership in the Evers’ administration when the killers were released, has made no comment at all.

Evers could also have withdrawn Parole Commission Chairman John Tate’s nomination, he could have criticized the killers’ releases when they happened (in some cases years ago), he could have pressured Tate to quit or rescind the releases (as he did in another case under great pressure last spring), or he could have chosen someone without such a soft-on-crime philosophy in the first place. Evers failed to do any of those things.

This is the short quote that Evers’ office gave the La Crosse Tribune, which followed up on our story that exposed the release of Terrance Shaw, who broke into a La Crosse nurse’s Onalaska home, raped, stabbed, and strangled her in a vicious random attack. The victims’ sons did not know he was paroled, and he’s living back in Onalaska. The Onalaska chief did not know, either. It’s the governor’s first comment on the paroles.

“The governor disagreed with decisions made by the former Parole Commission chair, and that’s why he asked for the former chair’s resignation,” is all the statement said. No empathy for victims’ families, some of whom were not notified!

Evers did not ask for Tate’s resignation until June 2022 after we reported on the looming parole of wife killer Douglas Balsewicz.


A challenge to the Media

We challenge the media to ask Gov Evers and Lt Gov Barnes these questions.

Reminder: Both men are on record as saying they wanted to reduce the state’s prison population by 50%, and Barnes called doing so “sexy” a year before the killers’ releases began.

Here are the questions:

Which decisions did you “disagree” with, specifically?

Gov. Evers, if you “disagreed’ with John Tate’s decisions to release convicted killers and rapists, why did you reappoint him to the Parole Commission in 2021, writing that you were “pleased” to do so? (Mandela Barnes, do you think this reappointment was wrong?)

If you did not know he released these killers and rapists when you reappointed him, isn’t that incompetence? (Mandela Barnes, is it incompetence by Evers?)

Shouldn’t you take the time to understand how your Parole Commission chairman is affecting public safety before you reappoint him? These are VERY serious cases. Isn’t a reappointment a vote of confidence in how someone is doing their job?

If you disagreed over these decisions, why were you silent on them for years? (Mandela Barnes, why are you silent?)

Why were you “pleased” to reappoint Tate when he had already released so many killers and rapists into Wisconsin communities?

As you point out, under great pressure from us, the family, and the media, you eventually urged Tate to rescind the parole of convicted wife killer Douglas Balsewicz last spring. Why did you not do the same for these other killers? Did those cases not matter to you? They are just as severe, and the families are just as upset.

Multiple victims’ families said the state did not notify them of the paroles of their loved one’s killers. What is your response to this? How was this allowed to happen when state law says reasonable efforts must be made to notify family members? What changes are you making to ensure this does not happen again? Do you acknowledge this is a systemic failure that is unconscionable? (Mandela Barnes…what say you?)

Are you saying you disagreed with all of the releases of killers and rapists by the Parole Commission? Again, why did you not say anything then? How could this many violent killers be released for three years with complete silence by you?

Your actions in the Balsewicz case prove you do have the power to do something – minimally, use your bully pulpit. You also could have withdrawn Tate’s nomination. Why did you not do so in 2019, 2020, 2021, and through May 2022, allowing him to serve and continuing to release violent criminals?

Are you concerned that these releases are threatening public safety?

Would you want Terrance Shaw living next to your wife, kids or grandkids? Why is that OK for the people of Onalaska?

Specifically,

Do you condemn:

Do you condemn the release of Randolph Whiting, who helped gang rape and then slashed the throat of a woman in Green Bay and tossed her in a manure pit to die? Would you want him living next to your kids, grandkids and wife? Why should the residents of Waupaca have to live next to him? YOU REAPPOINTED TATE AFTER THIS RELEASE. WHY?

Do you condemn the release of Scott Jenkins, a sniper who murdered an elderly dog walker in Wauwatosa? Why have you been silent on this parole? Would you want Jenkins living next to your wife, kids and grandkids? Why should the residents of Milwaukee have to live next to Jenkins? YOU REAPPOINTED TATE AFTER THIS RELEASE. WHY?

Ryan Brucker shot his dad to death as the father watched television. Why have you been silent on this parole? Would you want Brucker living next to your wife, kids, and grandkids? Why should the residents of Marietta, Georgia, have to live next to Brucker? YOU REAPPOINTED TATE AFTER BRUCKER WAS FREED. WHY?

Norman Pepin executed two engineers who were in Milwaukee for a conference in an I-94 ditch. Why have you been silent on this parole? Would you want Pepin living next to your wife, kids, and grandkids? Why should the residents of Marietta, Georgia, have to live next to Pepin?

Lori Esker strangled a romantic rival to death with a belt. Why have you been silent on this parole? Would you want Esker living next to your wife, kids, and grandkids? Why should the residents of Racine have to live next to Esker? YOU REAPPOINTED TATE AFTER ESKER WAS FREED. WHY?

Carl Beletsky decapitated his wife after murdering her and burned her head in a wood burning stone. Why have you been silent on this parole? Would you want Beletsky living next to your wife, kids, and grandkids? Why should the residents of Hatley, Wisconsin, have to live next to Beletsky? YOU REAPPOINTED TATE AFTER BELETSKY WAS FREED. WHY?

Wilson Brook murdered a Burlington police sergeant, who was a father of two and World War II veteran. He was shot five times and Brook tried to push his body off a cliff. Why are you silent on this parole? Would you want Brook living next to your wife, kids, and grandkids? Although he’s now deceased, he was paroled in 2019 and lived through at least July 2021. YOU REAPPOINTED TATE AFTER BROOK WAS FREED. WHY?

James Block strangled his girlfriend, revived her and then asphyxiated her, screaming for her to die. Why have you been silent on this parole? Would you want Block to live next to your wife, kids and grandkids? Why should residents of Kenosha have to live next to Block? YOU REAPPOINTED TATE AFTER BLOCK’S RELEASE. WHY?

Mark Ketterhagen shot 16-year-old pregnant teen Cathy Ziebell and threw her body off a bridge. Why have you been silent on this parole? Why should residents of West Allis have to live next to Ketterhagen? Would you want your wife, kids or grandkids to live next to him? YOU REAPPOINTED TATE AFTER KETTERHAGEN’S RELEASE. WHY>

Robert Taliaferro stabbed his wife in the heart, killing her. Why have you been silent on this parole? Would you want Taliaferro living next to your wife, kids, and grandkids? Why should the residents of Blooming Prairie, Minnesota, have to live next to Taliaferro?

Danny Hall killed a 17-year-old gas station attendant over $5, shooting him in the head. He shot two other clerks that day for no reason. Why are you silent on this release? Do you condemn it? Would you want your wife, kids and grandkids to live next to Hall? Why should residents of Milwaukee have to live next to Hall? YOU REAPPOINTED TATE AFTER HALL’S RELEASE. WHY?

James Mercer strangled a baby to death with a cord. Why are you silent on this release? Do you condemn it? Would you want your wife, kids and grandkids to live next to Mercer? Why should residents of Milwaukee have to live next to Mercer?

Table of Contents

Langdon Street Attacker

Susan Crawford Wished to ‘Fix’ Violent Langdon Street Attacker Who Brutally Beat Female UW-Madison Student

"I wish I could do something to fix Mr. Winslow's trauma that he's experienced," Judge...

Rep. Piwowarczyk: ROFR Violates Conservative Values, Stifles Free Market Competition

A newly proposed bill would grant at least two Wisconsin-based companies—the American Transmission Company (ATC)...
susan crawford

Susan Crawford Tried to Make Wisconsin Taxpayers Pay Spanish Train Company $66 Million

"The taxpayers for the state are paying the bill and not getting anything for it"...
Illegal Border Crossings Buses Carrying Migrants Northern Border Illegal Border Crossers Immigration Parole Illegal Immigrant Convicts Biden’s Immigration Policies

National Sheriffs Association Says About 700,000 ICE Arrest Warrants Nationwide

State and local law enforcement are being put in harm's way with Illinois’ migrant sanctuary policies, the Illinois Sheriffs Association says.

Association Executive Director Jim Kaitschuk said the National Sheriffs Association put out a note to their state partners that there are 700,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement administrative arrest warrants that are active. But, that doesn’t matter in Illinois.

“Illinois law enforcement is precluded and prohibited from participating in any activity that is solely related to civil enforcement,” Kaitschuk told The Center Square.

Illinois law, through the TRUST Act and The Way Forward Act, prohibits state and local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration officials if a civil detention order is the only thing ICE has against someone.

While Kaitschuk said they can cooperate when there are criminal orders, law enforcement not being able to cooperate with civil warrants can still cause security concerns.

“Unfortunately things do go wrong, right, and then we’re in a situation where you may not know anything about what’s occurring,” Kaitschuk said. “So, we’re kind of blind in those cases.”

Daily immigration arrests nationwide haven’t been comprehensively published, but some estimates are more than 21,000 immigration detentions across the country since Jan. 20, when President Donald Trump took office.

Last week, state Sen. Omar Aquino, D-Chicago, told a group of immigration advocates that Illinois will stand strong.

“You are not going to come into our house and just try to take people and separate families in this state,” Aquino said. “People have rights. They are human rights.”

Illinois law also limits ICE from using local county detention facilities. Kaitschuk said the state’s sanctuary policies prohibit police from even knowing whether they have a suspected illegal immigrant in their jail.

“And [ICE] they’re having to go to people’s houses and at the point in time, the problem then is that you may be subjecting people then that weren’t involved in any other criminal activity other than being here … not legally and open them up to being subjected to ICE at that point in time in that residence, as opposed to if they were at the jail, where they wouldn’t have been,” Kaitschuk said.

Illinois and Chicago officials are on the other side of the U.S. Department of Justice in litigation over migrant sanctuary policies. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is due in front of the U.S. House Oversight Committee Wednesday to discuss the city’s migrant sanctuary policies.

The 21 Foreign Nationals in the Milwaukee County Jail

There were at least 21 foreign nationals in the Milwaukee County Jail on a snapshot...
susan crawford

Wisconsin Child Rape Victim’s Haunting Statement to Judge Susan Crawford: ‘I Love Spaghetti & Mac N Cheese’

When it was Judge Susan Crawford's time to talk, she gave child rapist Curtis O'Brien...
Wisconsin's Rape Kit Strategy

EXCLUSIVE: Jill Karofsky Was an Architect of Wisconsin’s Rape Kit Strategy Before & During Brad Schimel’s AG Tenure

In multiple newspaper articles at the time, Jill Karofsky adamantly defended the Schimel DOJ's approach...
ryan withee

Ryan Withee, Missing: Where Is the Milwaukee Man?

“Yo, yo, I need help bro." That frantic-sounding message was written at 1:10 a.m. on April...
susan crawford

Brad Schimel Challenges Susan Crawford to Say ‘Men Are Men; Women Are Women’

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel is speaking out against Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' much-mocked...

Gov. Tony Evers Changes “Mother” to “Inseminated Person” in Budget Bill

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers introduced a budget bill this week that calls mothers an "inseminated...
josh kaul

‘Josh Kaul Called Me’: The Curious Timing of the AG’s ‘Fundraising’ Call

This is a column by Meg Ellefson, reprinted with permission from WSAU.com. This week, the unelected...

Susan Crawford’s ‘Mismanagement’ at DNR Led to ‘Terrible Time for Wisconsin Farmers’: Expert

As an official with the state DNR, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Susan Crawford orchestrated a...
brad schimel rape kits

Wisconsin DAs, Sheriffs Praise Brad Schimel For Fixing Rape Kit Backlog

Brad Schimel rape kit controversy: Top law enforcement officials say Susan Crawford is lying about...
susan crawford act 10

Act 10 Calculator: How Much More You’d Pay in Wisconsin Property Tax if It’s Overturned

"For an average Wisconsin home valued at $300,000, property taxes could increase by $624 or...
slinger trump sign

Slinger, Wisconsin Orders Elderly Couple to Take Down ‘God, Guns, Trump’ Sign

"We're battling to the end" - Cameron Merkel The Village of Slinger, Wisconsin, is ordering...
Daniel gonzales

How to Help Wounded Milwaukee Police Officer Daniel Gonzales

The Milwaukee Police Association has announced a donation fund to help wounded Milwaukee Police Officer...
brittany kinser

6 Things to Remember About Brittany Kinser’s Big Victory Tuesday

Moderate education reformer Brittany Kinser's big victory in a three-way primary on Tuesday night sets...
susan crawford

3 Killers of Dane Co. Man Will Soon All be Free Due to Judge Susan Crawford

They were involved in the brutal murder of a man who was beaten to death....
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Trump Gains More Ground in War Against DEI

A major shift is underway in the way large companies talk about and fund Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

President Donald Trump began the transition when he signed an executive order last month eliminating DEI policies and staff at the federal government and extending the anti-DEI policy to federal contractors.

Private companies, some of which had already begun the transition before Trump took office, remarkably began backing off their DEI policies, even if only symbolically with little internal change.

Costco resisted, pushing back on the Trump administration, but other major brands like Amazon Wal-Mart, Target, and Meta announced a pullback from DEI. Media reports indicated DEI discussions on earnings calls has plummeted.

Others, such as Wisconsin-based financial services company Fiserv, have not yet made a change, at least not publicly.

A murky legal future awaits companies willing to take the risk to stick with DEI policies, particularly in hiring.

Fiserv receives hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts.

According to Fiserv’s website’s Diversity & Inclusion page, the company is “committed to promoting diversity and inclusion (D&I) across all levels of the organization, in our communities and throughout our industry."

Fiserv says that it “partner[s] with people and organizations around the world to advance our D&I efforts and create opportunities for our employees, entrepreneurs around the world and the next generation of innovators.”

The company's diversity and inclusion page includes a careers section that discusses “engaging diverse talent” and events to connect with “diverse candidates.”

Critics of DEI initiatives and policies say they discriminate against white men and Asians and lead to hiring and promotion decisions based on factors such as race and sexual orientation rather than merit.

In its 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company boasted that "60% of director nominees for the 2024 annual meeting reflect gender or racial/ethnic diversity."

According to an April 2024 report from Payments Dive, Fiserv was “buoyed by sales to government entities” in Q1 of 2024 and reported $500 million in revenue from those contracts. The U.S. Coast Guard contracted with Fiserv in 2024 to help with payroll, according to HigherGov, among other government contracts.

Fiserv did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

A watershed moment against DEI came when during the Biden administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against longstanding affirmative action policies at American universities, one key example of white and Asian Americans being discriminated against.

Trump’s election has only solidified the new legal framework for what is permissible when considering race and gender in hiring, promotion, and workplace etiquette.

From Trump’s order:

In the private sector, many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism.

Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.

DEI has become increasingly controversial as activists use the moniker to advance every liberal policy on race and gender, often at taxpayer expense. In the federal government, DEI had become widespread and infiltrated into every part of governance, from racial quotas for promotions at the Pentagon to driving healthcare research at the National Institutes of Health.

At private companies, DEI policies guided investment decisions via ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) as well as personnel decisions with racial quotas for company board rooms. Those ideas are out of favor with the Trump administration.

Some of the companies resisting the shift from DEI could face legal action.

A coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to Costco alleging it is violating the law, as The Center Square previously reported.

“Although Costco’s motto is 'do the right thing,' it appears that the company is doing the wrong thing – clinging to DEI policies that courts and businesses have rejected as illegal,” the letter said.

This week, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against Starbucks for similar policies.

"By making employment decisions based on characteristics that have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well, Starbucks, for example, hires people by thumbing the scale based on at least one of Starbucks’ preferred immutable characteristics rather than an evaluation of an applicant’s merit and qualifications,” the lawsuit said. “Making hiring decision on non-merit considerations will skew the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri’s consumers."

A 2022 Starbucks document touts a DEI goal: “By 2025, our goal is to achieve BIPOC representation of at least 30% at all corporate levels and at least 40% at all retail and manufacturing roles.”

Bailey called the Starbucks policies discriminatory and illegal.

"With Starbucks’ discriminatory patterns, practices, and policies, Missouri’s consumers are required to pay higher prices and wait longer for goods and services that could be provided for less had Starbucks employed the most qualified workers, regardless of their race, color, sex, or national origin,” Bailey said. “As Attorney General, I have a moral and legal obligation to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks."

Vote Tuesday for Brittany Kinser If you Want Wisconsin Education Reform: Scott Frostman

The choice is clear. It’s not even close. It’s uncommon to have massive attention thrust...