Thursday, February 27, 2025
spot_imgspot_img
Thursday, February 27, 2025

Milwaukee Press Club 'Excellence in Wisconsin Journalism' 2020 & 2021 Award Winners

Susan Crawford Was Accused of Trying to Rush Pardons for 27 Criminals

spot_img

A judge blasted Susan Crawford for voting in secret to recommend commuting the sentence of the “hand in the pocket robber” in Racine.

Leftist Dane County Judge Susan Crawford, when she served as then-Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle’s pardon board chair, was accused of trying to rush the pardons of 27 convicted criminals by skipping the normal interview process, Wisconsin Right Now has documented.

Another board member went to the media, concerned that pardon requests would be granted without the pardon board having the chance to speak with the inmates, as Doyle ramped up the number of pardons at the tail end of his term.

Jim doyle
Jim doyle.

As Doyle’s pardon board chair, Crawford, who is now running against former AG Brad Schimel for a seat on the Wisconsin State Supreme Court, ran into a slew of controversies. The board member blasted her for the interview change; a judge blasted her for voting in secret to recommend that Doyle commute the sentence of the hand in the pocket robber; the DA opposed the commutation, and the news media raised transparency concerns. In the end, Doyle split with Crawford on that serial robbery and another armed robber’s case and declined to commute their sentences.

Interestingly, the media covered the controversies pretty aggressively at the time, especially because Doyle was escalating the number of pardons. He was soon succeeded by Republican Gov. Scott Walker, who instituted a strict no-pardon policy (Gov. Tony Evers has opened the floodgates back up.) However, now with Crawford trying to cement the liberal majority on the state’s highest court, the media are barely scrutinizing her record (The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is too busy distorting Schimel’s comments on bathrooms.)

Susan crawford pardons

According to an Associated Press story that ran in the Waukesha Freeman on Nov. 17, 2010, the pardon board’s then-chair, Susan Crawford, “decided to allow 27 applicants convicted of misdemeanors to skip the hearing.” After another member of the Pardon Board criticized the decision, the Board reversed course on plans to do the same with a group of felons.

Susan crawford pardons

According to the Republican Eagle, Crawford voted outside a public meeting to “recommend reducing the 80-year prison terms for armed robbers Walker Johnson of Milwaukee and Darryl Norton of Racine,” drawing more criticism. It was the first commutation recommendation in 15 years. Other stories give the inmate’s name as Walter Johnson.

Cindy O’Donnell, the state Justice Department’s representative on the board, told the AP that it appeared Crawford wanted to “move through applicants quickly before Gov. Jim Doyle” left office by skipping the interviews.

Susan crawford pardons

O’Donnell wrote an email to Crawford saying she was “worried about basing recommendations solely on documents. She also questioned whether the policy change violates a nearly decade-old gubernatorial executive order that requires the board to listen to each applicant at a hearing,” the AP reported.

“The board considered pardon requests for people convicted of misdemeanors at its Nov. 17 meeting without interviewing the applicants, a break from the board’s long-standing practice,” The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel wrote.

According to the newspaper, Crawford suddenly reversed course after the criticism erupted.

“The board had planned to hold a similar meeting in December in which requests from felons would be considered without interviewing applicants. But during the Nov. 17 closed meeting, Crawford said she was changing course and would take testimony from all felons applying for pardons,” The Journal Sentinel added.

Darryl norton
Darryl norton.

The AP story reported that Crawford, at the time, doubled “as Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle’s chief lawyer.”

The governor’s spokesman told AP at the time that in “very few cases,” convicted criminals had waived their appearances. But O’Donnell, who worked for then-Republican Attorney General JB Van Hollen, claimed Crawford “told the applicants to waive their appearances.” She said she had “consistently objected,” the AP reported.

It was not the only controversy. She was also accused of taking secret votes.

The AP reported on Nov. 24, 2010, that, as chairman, Crawford “refrained from publicly voting on commuting the sentences of two inmates,” Walter Johnson and Darryl Norton” who “argued their robbery sentences are excessive.”

However, she subsequently registered her vote “in favor of the commutations a day later, outside of the board meeting,” the article says. Doyle’s spokesman said Crawford was ill at the meeting. But the Journal Sentinel noted that she voted on pardons at the same meeting where she skipped the public vote on the commutations, which had already generated news coverage.

“The board voted 3-3 on Johnson’s request and 4-2 against Norton’s request. The next day, Crawford voted in favor of both requests. That made the board’s final vote 4-3 to recommend granting Johnson’s request and 4-3 to recommend denying Norton’s request,” The Journal Sentinel reported at the time. Doyle had the final say.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel also reported at the time that Crawford “tried to close the Nov. 17 board meeting to the public without a vote by the board, but held the vote after reporters protested that one was required.”

Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council President Bill Lueders was quoted in that story as saying Crawford’s action “certainly violates the spirit and intent” of the open meetings law, although the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel wrote that it appeared not to violate it.

That came after the AP conducted a review in October 2010 that found that Doyle had granted 85 pardons “between mid-August . . . and the same time this year, a little more than a third of the 214 pardons the governor has issued since he took office in 2003.” In other words, Doyle was stepping up the pace before Republican Gov. Scott Walker took office.

That was an escalation from Gov. Tommy Thompson, who granted 62 pardons from 1994 to 1999, AP wrote.

According to AP, most (but not all) of the Doyle pardons went to “small-time criminals.” The authority to grant a pardon was in the hands of the governor, but Doyle’s spokesman said he had never gone against the unanimous recommendation of the advisory board.

Crawford has long advocated measures favorable to criminal defendants. In a 2018 article in the Capital Times, Crawford said she strongly supported the “use and expansion of restorative justice and diversion programs” as well as bail reforms to “make sure low-income people aren’t held in jail solely because they can’t make cash bail.” She described her values as “progressive.” We previously wrote that she helped gut a law to monitor sex offenders and gave a weak sentence to a child molester.

“As chief legal counsel to Gov. Jim Doyle, I was chair of the Pardon Board. I heard from hundreds of citizens struggling to access employment, housing credit, and other needs due to long-ago criminal convictions,” she said.

The judge who sentenced Norton blasted Crawford. Racine County Circuit Judge Dennis J. Barry “sentenced Norton and opposes commuting his sentence. In an e-mail to the Journal Sentinel, Barry expressed surprise at how Crawford voted on the recommendation,” the newspaper wrote at the time.

“Regarding Ms. Crawford’s voting in these matters, I would say that it seems highly unusual and doesn’t speak much for her adherence to Wisconsin’s tradition of openness in government,” Barry wrote. “Why would she do that and is that even authorized procedure? Did she have to consult with the governor first?”

O’Donnell voted against commuting the sentences, according to the Journal Sentinel at the time.

“They’re very, very serious offenses,” she said. “I don’t think it’s appropriate for me to substitute my judgment for the sentencing court judge.”

Lester Pines, an attorney helping one of the inmates, later became Crawford’s boss. While working for him, she would file lawsuits seeking to eradicate the state’s Act 10 and Voter ID laws.

An article in the Racine Journal Times in 1989 said that Norton, then 23, was a suspect in a string of gasoline and convenience store robberies and was accused of an additional 10 robbery charges.

He was arrested on eight charges of armed robbery and two charges of robbery, the article stated. He held his hand in his jacket pocket as if armed and demanded money from clerks, it says.

At the time, he “was on probation from a strong arm robbery conviction” the Journal Times wrote.

A 2006 article in the Racine Journal Times said Norton received an 80-year sentence in the 1980s. In 2004, he appealed to have the sentence reduced but lost.

He pleaded guilty to five counts of armed robbery as a habitual offender and was sentenced to the term in 1990, the story says.

At the time of sentencing, the judge noted that Norton was released from prison for armed robbery in 1988 and was committing robberies again within two months, blaming cocaine addiction but being unwilling to participate in treatment, the story says.

The judge wrote that Norton had “lone involvement in 12 robberies while on parole for previous robberies,” that article says.

Racine County DA Mike Nieskes wrote, according to the Journal Sentinel, that “Mr. Norton may have made strides in his behavior while in the Department of Corrections. He may have addressed certain issues, which may make him less of a risk. However, that is not a reason for the Pardon Advisory Board nor the Governor’s Office to upset the sentence of the court and sit as a Super-Appellate Court on the questioning of sentencing in this or almost any other matter.”

Norton was called the “hand in the pocket robber,” according to a news article from the time.

As for Johnson, the Journal Sentinel reported that “armed with a sawed-off shotgun, Walker (Walter) Johnson and two others robbed a Milwaukee tavern in 1990, when Johnson was 21 years old.”

He got 80 years as well. Judge Rudolph Randa sentenced Johnson.

Norton ended up being paroled in 2011, according to Corrections records. By 2012, he was admitted to the Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility on a DCC hold, and the same occurred in 2012. He was last released from a DCC hold in 2012.

Today he is on active community supervision.

He reoffended in 2016, committing felony fleeing an officer and third offense OWI, court records show. He was sentenced to probation and a time-served disposition of 177 days in jail.

It’s not clear what happened to Johnson.

susan crawford

Susan Crawford Tried to Make Wisconsin Taxpayers Pay Spanish Train Company $66 Million

"The taxpayers for the state are paying the bill and not getting anything for it"...
susan crawford

Wisconsin Child Rape Victim’s Haunting Statement to Judge Susan Crawford: ‘I Love Spaghetti & Mac N Cheese’

When it was Judge Susan Crawford's time to talk, she gave child rapist Curtis O'Brien...
Wisconsin's Rape Kit Strategy

EXCLUSIVE: Jill Karofsky Was an Architect of Wisconsin’s Rape Kit Strategy Before & During Brad Schimel’s AG Tenure

In multiple newspaper articles at the time, Jill Karofsky adamantly defended the Schimel DOJ's approach...
ryan withee

Ryan Withee, Missing: Where Is the Milwaukee Man?

“Yo, yo, I need help bro." That frantic-sounding message was written at 1:10 a.m. on April...
susan crawford

Brad Schimel Challenges Susan Crawford to Say ‘Men Are Men; Women Are Women’

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel is speaking out against Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' much-mocked...

Gov. Tony Evers Changes “Mother” to “Inseminated Person” in Budget Bill

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers introduced a budget bill this week that calls mothers an "inseminated...
josh kaul

‘Josh Kaul Called Me’: The Curious Timing of the AG’s ‘Fundraising’ Call

This is a column by Meg Ellefson, reprinted with permission from WSAU.com. This week, the unelected...

Susan Crawford’s ‘Mismanagement’ at DNR Led to ‘Terrible Time for Wisconsin Farmers’: Expert

As an official with the state DNR, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Susan Crawford orchestrated a...
brad schimel rape kits

Wisconsin DAs, Sheriffs Praise Brad Schimel For Fixing Rape Kit Backlog

Brad Schimel rape kit controversy: Top law enforcement officials say Susan Crawford is lying about...
susan crawford act 10

Act 10 Calculator: How Much More You’d Pay in Wisconsin Property Tax if It’s Overturned

"For an average Wisconsin home valued at $300,000, property taxes could increase by $624 or...
slinger trump sign

Slinger, Wisconsin Orders Elderly Couple to Take Down ‘God, Guns, Trump’ Sign

"We're battling to the end" - Cameron Merkel The Village of Slinger, Wisconsin, is ordering...
Daniel gonzales

How to Help Wounded Milwaukee Police Officer Daniel Gonzales

The Milwaukee Police Association has announced a donation fund to help wounded Milwaukee Police Officer...
brittany kinser

6 Things to Remember About Brittany Kinser’s Big Victory Tuesday

Moderate education reformer Brittany Kinser's big victory in a three-way primary on Tuesday night sets...
susan crawford

3 Killers of Dane Co. Man Will Soon All be Free Due to Judge Susan Crawford

They were involved in the brutal murder of a man who was beaten to death....
Frederick Walls Trump Holds Cash Special Counsel Jack Smith Iowa Victory for Trump Remove Trump From Primary Ballot

Trump Gains More Ground in War Against DEI

A major shift is underway in the way large companies talk about and fund Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

President Donald Trump began the transition when he signed an executive order last month eliminating DEI policies and staff at the federal government and extending the anti-DEI policy to federal contractors.

Private companies, some of which had already begun the transition before Trump took office, remarkably began backing off their DEI policies, even if only symbolically with little internal change.

Costco resisted, pushing back on the Trump administration, but other major brands like Amazon Wal-Mart, Target, and Meta announced a pullback from DEI. Media reports indicated DEI discussions on earnings calls has plummeted.

Others, such as Wisconsin-based financial services company Fiserv, have not yet made a change, at least not publicly.

A murky legal future awaits companies willing to take the risk to stick with DEI policies, particularly in hiring.

Fiserv receives hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts.

According to Fiserv’s website’s Diversity & Inclusion page, the company is “committed to promoting diversity and inclusion (D&I) across all levels of the organization, in our communities and throughout our industry."

Fiserv says that it “partner[s] with people and organizations around the world to advance our D&I efforts and create opportunities for our employees, entrepreneurs around the world and the next generation of innovators.”

The company's diversity and inclusion page includes a careers section that discusses “engaging diverse talent” and events to connect with “diverse candidates.”

Critics of DEI initiatives and policies say they discriminate against white men and Asians and lead to hiring and promotion decisions based on factors such as race and sexual orientation rather than merit.

In its 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company boasted that "60% of director nominees for the 2024 annual meeting reflect gender or racial/ethnic diversity."

According to an April 2024 report from Payments Dive, Fiserv was “buoyed by sales to government entities” in Q1 of 2024 and reported $500 million in revenue from those contracts. The U.S. Coast Guard contracted with Fiserv in 2024 to help with payroll, according to HigherGov, among other government contracts.

Fiserv did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

A watershed moment against DEI came when during the Biden administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against longstanding affirmative action policies at American universities, one key example of white and Asian Americans being discriminated against.

Trump’s election has only solidified the new legal framework for what is permissible when considering race and gender in hiring, promotion, and workplace etiquette.

From Trump’s order:

In the private sector, many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism.

Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.

DEI has become increasingly controversial as activists use the moniker to advance every liberal policy on race and gender, often at taxpayer expense. In the federal government, DEI had become widespread and infiltrated into every part of governance, from racial quotas for promotions at the Pentagon to driving healthcare research at the National Institutes of Health.

At private companies, DEI policies guided investment decisions via ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) as well as personnel decisions with racial quotas for company board rooms. Those ideas are out of favor with the Trump administration.

Some of the companies resisting the shift from DEI could face legal action.

A coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to Costco alleging it is violating the law, as The Center Square previously reported.

“Although Costco’s motto is 'do the right thing,' it appears that the company is doing the wrong thing – clinging to DEI policies that courts and businesses have rejected as illegal,” the letter said.

This week, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against Starbucks for similar policies.

"By making employment decisions based on characteristics that have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well, Starbucks, for example, hires people by thumbing the scale based on at least one of Starbucks’ preferred immutable characteristics rather than an evaluation of an applicant’s merit and qualifications,” the lawsuit said. “Making hiring decision on non-merit considerations will skew the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri’s consumers."

A 2022 Starbucks document touts a DEI goal: “By 2025, our goal is to achieve BIPOC representation of at least 30% at all corporate levels and at least 40% at all retail and manufacturing roles.”

Bailey called the Starbucks policies discriminatory and illegal.

"With Starbucks’ discriminatory patterns, practices, and policies, Missouri’s consumers are required to pay higher prices and wait longer for goods and services that could be provided for less had Starbucks employed the most qualified workers, regardless of their race, color, sex, or national origin,” Bailey said. “As Attorney General, I have a moral and legal obligation to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks."

Vote Tuesday for Brittany Kinser If you Want Wisconsin Education Reform: Scott Frostman

The choice is clear. It’s not even close. It’s uncommon to have massive attention thrust...
U.S.-Canada Border

White House Touts Border Progress

The White House over the weekend touted its progress on the southern border as President Donald Trump completed his fourth week back in office.

"Encounters of illegal immigrants at our southern border are plummeting and migrants are starting to realize it’s fruitless to attempt to illegally cross our border," the White House said Saturday in a statement.

Upon taking office, Trump issued a series of executive orders ending Biden administration policies that allowed asylum seekers to flood into America. On his second day in office, the president sent 1,500 active-duty service members and additional air and intelligence assets.

Border crossing attempts are down more than 90% from the same time last year, according to data first obtained by the New York Post.

“Border numbers are down over 90% in three weeks,” Tom Homan, the pick by Trump called border czar, said during an interview on Fox News. “When you got 90% less people coming across the border, how many women aren’t being raped by the cartels? How many children aren’t drowning? How many women and children aren’t being sex trafficked in this country? President Trump is a gamechanger.”

Multiple media reports indicate many people headed from other countries to the United States have since changed their mind and headed back home.

The White House pointed out a Wednesday story from The Washington Times showing officials in Costa Rica and Panama are meeting to discuss how to handle the large number of people who had been waiting in Mexico to enter the United States but have since given up and are returning to South America.

The administration also linked a Thursday story from Telemundo saying "migrants from Honduras, El Salvador, Columbia and Venezuela are heading back home" instead of continuing to America. And the White House linked a Thursday story from El Cronista saying the Mexican government provided a $9.3 million contract for 140 shelters to help with people "returning to Mexico."

Policies during the Biden administration allowed 12 million people to enter the country, most given dates to appear with immigration officials much later. The volume pushed many of those appointments beyond a year and even 18 months. A surge in fentanyl accompanied the timing.

Trump, the second term Republican, has reversed the trend. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and specifically ICE Enforcement and Removal regional offices, across the country have helped move many people illegally in the country back to their native homelands.

Trump also threatened tariffs against Mexico if it did not help fix the problem. To temporarily avert the tariffs, Mexico’s president agreed to deploy thousands more troops to the southern border.

In another reversal, the Biden administration worked – including litigation – to block Texas from installing border security measures like barbed wire and buoys in the river to keep people from swimming across.

In a social media post Sunday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott wrote, “Texas installed more buoys into the Rio Grande the SAME day President Trump returned to office. The Biden administration tried – and FAILED – to keep Texas from using this effective border security tactic.

“Now, we have a President who is partnering with Texas to deny illegal entry.”

elon musk trump twitter

Musk Has No Time to Lose! [Up Against the Wall]

I love Elon’s sense of urgency. It’s no wonder he gets stuff done when others...

Book Excerpt: The Hollowing Out of Wisconsin Farmland

The following excerpt is from Wisconsin author Brian Reisinger’s “Land Rich, Cash Poor: My Family’s Hope...
lake mills

‘Bikers Against Predators’ Upset Lake Mills Police Didn’t Immediately Arrest Man in Sting

Update: Jail records show the man has now been booked into the Jefferson Co. Jail...